NVR Logo
Zeppelin flights for Napa?
The Zeppelin, at a cost of about $15 million, is about 250 feet long and flies at about 1,300 feet. A company is proposing to fly these in Napa County this fall. Submitted photo | Buy photos
Firm plans to launch dirigibles over vineyards this fall
Monday, June 30, 2008
Save and Share Share
10 a.m.Move over, hot air balloons.

A company called Airship Ventures wants to fly a Zeppelin the size of a jumbo jet over wine country.
Alexandra Hall, chief executive officer of Airship Ventures, based at Moffett Field in Mountain View, said the company is still working out the details, but she’s sure of one thing: The firm wants to make regular flights over wine country.

The Zeppelin, which costs about $15 million, will be about 250 feet long, fly at about 1,300 feet and at a speed of between 30 and 35 mph.
“We don’t want to fly so high as to be intrusive, but be low enough to know what you are looking at,” said Hall. “The ride is very relaxing and quiet and you don’t have to get up early in the morning like you do for a balloon ride.”

“We need to come up and do more flight surveys,” Hall said. “Right now we are working on just getting the airship here. We know of at least one spot we can work from right now.”
Hall said she hopes flights could begin in late October or November, depending on a number of factors, including securing a place to land the airship.

Muted reaction

Napa County Airport manager Martin Pehl said a representative from Airship Ventures stopped by his office about a month ago to discuss the possibility of a Zeppelin landing and taking off from the airport.

Pehl’s concern is how the Zeppelin will impact existing air service at the 820-acre airport facility in the south county.

“I’m not sure if we can accommodate them ... (the Zeppelin) is going to take quite a bit of real estate,” Pehl said.

Pehl sail Airship Ventures still needs to get FAA approval. His understanding was flights weren’t expected to happen until sometime in 2009.

“This is the first that I have heard about it,” said Carol Ann Rogers, of Napa Valley Aloft, a ballooning company in Yountville, located at the V Marketplace.

“Napa Valley is a sensitive area. In the 30 years we have been in operation, we try to be sensitive to protect what we all think is so wonderful about this valley,” Rogers said.

Made in Germany

Hall expects a flight around the Napa Valley to last one to two hours. “We need to do some test flights.”

The cost for a ride? Probably between $400 and $500 per person. “We will be setting the prices soon,” Hall said.

The Zeppelin is expected to arrive in the Bay Area in October.

“We envision the first flights to take off before the end of the year ... coming from Moffett Field and dropping people off in Napa County and also being based in the area for several days, flying tourists over the wine country,” Hall said. It would also fly elsewhere in the Bay Area.

“We hope to fly over the beautiful countryside of Napa Valley when flying out of the airport there,” Hall said.

Hall said the company has been looking at several locations for takeoffs and landings — including Napa County Airport, but also locations in Sonoma County. The airship needs an area about 1,000 feet in diameter for landing.

Aboard the Zeppelin, passengers can walk around, open windows, take aerial photos or even chat with the Zeppelin pilot.

As many as 12 people at a time would potentially be able to buy a ticket and float over the verdant vineyards.

Hall envisions the Zeppelin being chartered by an entire group. “We can see potential for usage for weddings ... get married on the airship ... it helps solve the problem of how many people you invite,” she said laughing.

Hall thinks the Napa Valley would be special for a Valentine’s Day Zeppelin flight over the Napa Valley.

Hall said the company wants to bring the experience to Napa Valley because there are people already coming here for balloon rides to enjoy the vineyards from the air.

“There are some excellent ballooning companies here,” she said. “So it made sense to us to see what location choices there are. I’ve seen the wonderful scenery in Germany (from a Zeppelin), which is where Airship Ventures aircraft is being built. I think this would be a wonderful addition to what people can already do ... a welcome addition to how people can experience the wine country.”

Construction of Airship Venture’s Zeppelin was completed in Germany in late May and took about 18 months.

Hall said the company’s Zeppelin — until mid August — will be floating tourists over the River Thames in southern England. Then the airship travels to Holland and will be shipped across the Atlantic to the United States.

Today’s Zeppelin — using non-flammable helium — is nothing like the infamous 804-foot-long Hindenburg that exploded in 1937, which was filled with volatile hydrogen.

Airship Ventures, founded in 2007, moved its operations to Moffett Field in a partnership with NASA that will include partial use of the historic Hangar 2, built in 1942 to house Navy blimps.
37 comment(s)

LMW wrote on Jun 30, 2008 10:49 AM:

" What an eyesore!!!!!!! "

MarkMiwords wrote on Jun 30, 2008 10:57 AM:

" More tourists peering into, and taking photos of our backyards. How revolting! "

psychochik wrote on Jun 30, 2008 10:58 AM:

" I'll pass. The hot air balloons are a ton better and who cares if ya hafta get up early in the morning ?!? "

napadad wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:11 AM:

" no,nien nyet "

silence dogood wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:30 AM:

" Wow; revolting idea... "

Dwayne wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:33 AM:

" These people clearly are ignorant about the weather and winds we have here in the Fall and Winter. It appears they also haven't done their research on how many hot air balloon accidents there have been due to weather either. ....And, $400-$500 a pop...??? That must include a three course meal, champagne, a massage, and free parking. "

db76 wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:34 AM:

" $400 to $500 per person...Who can afford that? I anticipate: EPIC FAIL "

comment wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:38 AM:

" Zepplins belong at sporting events. That's it. Fortunately, I don't think many people would be willing to pay $400-$500 for a ride in it. "

urte wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:38 AM:

" I have to agree with the other comments...while I enjoy seeing the colorful balloons from my upstairs office...I cannot image having my whole window taken up by a Zeppelin...and visions of the Hindenburg do linger...
A bit of a "hairbrained" idea...and while a trip in the balloon is still affordable...$400 to $500 per person...is steep even for the "big shots" in town...so it will all be out of towners...! "

LMW wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:47 AM:

" looks like a big white moving billboard and may cut into the route our travelers dollars should go through for our county "

Unclestuy wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:54 AM:

" I have to agree, $400.00 to $500.00 a person is absolutely stupid and unreasonable. Only for the rich and famous can afford that. I can go on the Wine Train, get more bang for the buck and still go 25-30 mph. I would be treated like royality. Still cheaper to go by balloon. "

jimmie wrote on Jun 30, 2008 12:13 PM:

" Flying billboards, egregious helicopter flights and those stupid airplanes with advertising light shows endlessly harassing innocent townsfolk... great. Keep this GARBAGE out of our skies (and I love the wine and hospitality economy, here). "

comment wrote on Jun 30, 2008 12:20 PM:

" 4 people can spend an hour in a helicopter for $1,200. Cheaper, smaller, and just as safe. "

sickothis wrote on Jun 30, 2008 12:27 PM:

" hehehe. Once they get FAA approval from GWB's cronies they can do pretty much whatever they want. I bet the valley looks awesome at 1300' and 35 mph. Oh and by the way - those things have propellers. Little easier to deal with the weather. "

mikeb wrote on Jun 30, 2008 12:38 PM:

" A balloon actually capable of taking off AND landing at a legally permissable location? Sounds like a better idea to me. "

Lane wrote on Jun 30, 2008 12:45 PM:

" What an appalling idea. It really gives a new meaning to the phrase "air pollution." Perhaps its time to expand the Viewshed Ordinance. Seriously, what avenues exist to prevent this? "

sickothis wrote on Jun 30, 2008 1:05 PM:

" Lane - once they get FAA approval I believe the answer is none. "

Cadence wrote on Jun 30, 2008 1:10 PM:

" Can they land at Alston like the balloons?
Maybe the dog police can entice Airship Ventures to glue on a few spy cameras! "

marine1/1 wrote on Jun 30, 2008 1:44 PM:

" Do these guys need permission from the city or county? Do we get any money from this company or just a big eye sore in the sky? We have balloons, helicopter and airplane rides over the valley already. What part of the $400.00- $500.00 does the city or county get for the intrusion? I bet none. "

reason-ator wrote on Jun 30, 2008 1:56 PM:

" I don't have a problem with blimps, hot-air balloons, etc. flying over occasionally. Actually, they're kinda kool. I suppose they could get annoying after awhile, but not as annoying as all the traffic tearing up our roads to get to their new hotels. "

matt@newspeak wrote on Jun 30, 2008 2:39 PM:

" Yeesh, nothing says 'quaint' like treating the Valley as if it were the superbowl with blimps flying overhead.

Really bad idea. "

nwnapan wrote on Jun 30, 2008 3:02 PM:

" If you listen to Led Zeppelin while on a Zeppelin will anyone hear? "

russ wrote on Jun 30, 2008 3:04 PM:

" It will never happen. "

Dwayne wrote on Jun 30, 2008 3:13 PM:

" comment wrote on Jun 30, 2008 12:20 PM:
" 4 people can spend an hour in a helicopter for $1,200. Cheaper, smaller, and just as safe. "

Sorry, but I don't fly in anything that's designed to disassemble itself..... "

MarshaMarsha wrote on Jun 30, 2008 3:17 PM:

" Yikes! A giant billboard in the sky. I'm thinking wine + blimp = "WIMP". How's that for a moniker? "

musikluvr wrote on Jun 30, 2008 3:34 PM:

" This is great. I would ride a blimp. I don't like balloons. There's something scary about being up in the air with no place to land and no way to get to a landing place. "

merri wrote on Jun 30, 2008 4:27 PM:

" Hope they fly low enough for me to put a couple holes in their tail end. With my old eyes it might look like that ginat bird that flies around my house. "

common sense wrote on Jun 30, 2008 4:34 PM:

" Cool! We used to have tons of blimps around when I was a kid. Sign me up! "

reason-ator wrote on Jun 30, 2008 4:39 PM:

" Dwayne, this "Sorry, but I don't fly in anything that's designed to disassemble itself..... " is hilarious. Thanks for the chuckle. "

Suze wrote on Jun 30, 2008 5:06 PM:

" Well Mike Treleven obviously likes this idea and is strongly promoting it. Even the carefully staged 'submitted photo' did not make this look like a good idea to me. How awful, what an eyesore this will be. The balloons are tolerable, this is intolerable. What is next for Napa? Neon and more castles I don't doubt. Hey, why don't we build a sky rail running from one side of the valley to the next! Think of the $$$$! "

supernova8610 wrote on Jun 30, 2008 5:18 PM:

" Three words to describe this project: Eyesore. Garbage. Failure. "

imantycris wrote on Jun 30, 2008 8:48 PM:

" Oh the humanity!!! Let's hope this never happens.

I went for a ride on the Goodyear blimp in LA years back. It was not that spectacular. In fact it was boring.

There have been several unscheduled, close call landings of balloons in my neighborhood. It is very nerve wracking to see a balloon miss my chimney by 20 feet. Hopefully the blimps will not come near southeast Napa "

sotto voce wrote on Jun 30, 2008 8:57 PM:

" Go away!

... (please!) "

boots wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:17 PM:

" No doubt this will be the main mode of transportation to The TRIAD 'eco-village' in Angwin! "

plasticpinkflamingo wrote on Jun 30, 2008 10:34 PM:

" Zeppelins? Made in Germany? I think that idea has already been done.

Just think, in cold weather they could come down really low and use their propellers on the vineyards. They may also blow over small children and dogs, but that's just entertainment for the $500 passengers.

But how about a (drum roll please) Commuter Zeppelin. No rails up and down the valley. Just clear a large enough area for the blimp (OK I know there is a difference between a blimp and a zeppelin) at each stop. It could run from Calistoga, stop in St. Helena and Yountville and Napa then drop commuters at the ferry in Vallejo or continue on to the East Bay or SF, then return. No highway congestion, no bus fumes. Have to be a little cheaper than $500 a ride, but we'll lose a little on each one and make it up in the volume. Government subsidy, that's the ticket!

I can see it all now: blimps moving silently up and down the Valley, gaudy advertising for wineries lit up on the side (and commuter passengers lit up inside at the bar).

But wait, there's more! The best part would be computers set up that can only access the NVR website, so the commuters can make their observations (pun intended) during their commuter ride.

Or how about blimp races? Blimp pizza delivery? Blimp newspaper delivery (Smack - Owww! - oh well, one less NVR reader). Government blimps stationed over Napa, peering into homes with their Homeland Security cameras, observing citizens as if they had no clothes on! Taking pictures of red light runners and strawberry vendors. Hovering over traffic checkpoints to mark the drivers diverting around the checkpoint.

There's something for everyone here. "

Jigs wrote on Jul 1, 2008 10:14 PM:

" I will only consider flying in these lighter-than-air machines if the pilots and crew are required to wear the Prussian pickelhaube and the passengers get to fire a volley at the other blimps with blunderbusses. Only then will the illusion be complete. "

TFYTMP wrote on Jul 6, 2008 7:53 AM:

" “We don’t want to fly so high as to be intrusive" This a direct quote from the paper. I think that the word should be low not high. If the word said was really "high" then the person does not know what they are doing and should not be allowed to do business in Napa. I think that it is a mis-statement by the Register, AGAIN. "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy