NVR Logo
Preserve, protect, defend
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Save and Share Share
We citizens are hiring for the most important job in the nation.

In little more than two months, we will elect the next president of the United States. The major candidates are Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.
The basis for our decision should not be which candidate does better on Letterman, which one says something that a special interest group  twist into an insult or which one hits us with the most campaign ads in the last two weeks of the campaign.

Our responsibility is to elect the person who is best suited to lead and defend the United States of America. That candidate must be a person of great character; someone who has demonstrated and will demonstrate courage, leadership, wisdom and calm under fire.
In our view, the most important issues facing the next president include:

• The War on Terror, including hostilities in Iraq and Afghanistan, domestic policies that ensure our homeland safety and international diplomacy with countries that may pose risks to our safety and security.
• The economy, including job growth and stability, inflation, housing and regulation of the markets.

• Energy policy, including reliance on foreign suppliers of petroleum, policy on domestic supplies and use of alternative energy technologies.

• Upholding the Constitution, including appointments to the Supreme Court and policies on civil rights, criminal justice and privacy.

• Education and health care, including costs and coverage for hundreds of millions of Americans.

For the next six Sundays, the Register editorial board will address these subjects, as well as the backgrounds of the candidates, on this page.

After careful consideration of these subjects, we will publish our endorsement for president on Oct. 5.

We encourage readers to use our editorials as a tool in their own decision-making process. We also encourage readers to take advantage of the many other reliable sources of information available on these two men and their candidacies.

Finally, we warn readers to be cautious about the information they utilize. Between unreliable Internet sites, special-interest-driven attack ads and the tabloid-style distractions, there are many sources of disinformation out there these days.

We are on the verge of making a decision that will profoundly affect our lives, the lives of our family members and friends, the communities where we live, and people around the world. We are the hiring committee, and we must take our responsibility seriously.

Barack Obama

Born: Aug. 4, 1961, Honolulu, Hawaii

Home: Chicago, Ill.

College: Columbia University, 1983; Harvard Law School, 1991

Family: Wife, Michelle, two daughters

Non-political career: Civil rights attorney, political organizer, constitutional law instructor, University of Chicago.

Political career: Elected to Illinois State Senate, 1996. Elected to the U.S. Senate, 2004.

More on Obama

His father, Barack Obama Sr., was from Kenya. His mother is from Kansas. His parents met in school in Hawaii, where his father was an exchange student and his mother lived after her father served at Pearl Harbor.

Obama was raised and educated in Indonesia and Hawaii.

President of Harvard Law Review. Got his start in Chicago ward politics, working with a church group to address inner city issues. Author of two best-selling books, “The Audacity of Hope” and “Dreams from My Father.”

His keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention in 2004 catapulted him to national recognition.

Announced his campaign for the presidency at the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Ill., where Abraham Lincoln gave his famous “house divided” speech in 1858.

If elected, Obama, who is of mixed race, would be considered the first African-American president of the United States.

He has promised his daughters, Malia, 10, and Sasha, 7, a dog this fall — win or lose.

John McCain

Born: August 29, 1936, Panama Canal Zone, Panama

Home: Phoenix, Ariz.

College: U.S. Naval Academy, 1958; National War College, 1973.

Family: Wife Cindy, seven children, four grandchildren

Non-political career: Pilot, U.S. Navy, 1958-1981.

Political career: Elected to U.S. House of Representatives, 1982. Elected to U.S. Senate in 1986.

More on McCain

His parents and grandparents were Navy admirals. Both his father and grandfather served in World War II and earned Naval honors.

Raised in northern Virginia.

Author of best-selling memoir, “Faith of My Fathers.”

One of his children was adopted from Mother Teresa’s orphanage in Bangladesh. One son is serving in the U.S. Marine Corps.

Spent six years as a military prisoner during Vietnam War. In October, 1967, during his 23rd bombing mission, his plane was hit by a missile and he ejected. Spent time in brutal prison known as Hanoi Hilton. Naval honors include the Silver Star, Bronze Star, Purple Heart and the Distinguished Flying Cross.

First ran for GOP nomination for president in 2000. If elected, McCain would be the oldest person to assume the presidency. He will be 72 on Inauguration Day.

He talks to fellow prisoners of war, those with whom he shared a cell in Vietnam, almost daily.
32 comment(s)

chickasepsima wrote on Aug 24, 2008 1:15 AM:

" You missed Immigration on your list of important issues. "

kevin wrote on Aug 24, 2008 9:10 AM:

" I thought the NVR was focused on local issues? Why waste all that ink re-printing bio information that could be read off any campaign brochure?

Real "hard hitting" journalism at work... "

101napa4gen wrote on Aug 24, 2008 11:10 AM:

" NVR please same your time and energy, the NVR will endorse Barack. Please tell your readers the last Non Dem you endorsed!? "

101napa4gen wrote on Aug 24, 2008 11:13 AM:

" error on my side, which Dem you DIDN'T endorse. Sorry for the mistake!!!! "

Winewoman wrote on Aug 24, 2008 11:16 AM:

" Yes, you missed immigration. In addition, why must you endorse a candidate? Why not do what you are supposed to do - report the unbiased facts and let the readers make their own decision. Frankly, I don't care what you - the editorial board - think or who you endorse - your role is to provide unbiased facts to your readers. You're supposed to be a news organization. "

NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Aug 24, 2008 12:14 PM:

" 101napa4gen:
The Register Editorial Board endorsed Bush in the last presidential election.
Here is the link to that endorsement

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2004/10/24/opinion/export12286.txt "

greysack wrote on Aug 24, 2008 1:10 PM:

" Dan, not only that but I beleive the SF Chronicle in 2000 indorsed Bush. "

Winewoman wrote on Aug 24, 2008 1:23 PM:

" Newspapers are supposed to be the independent, unbiased voices that chronicle the news. The NVR would be better off by declaring their independence and serve the public by keeping their opinions to themselves. Journalists love to cite the fact that the press is the only industry protected by the Constitution. A free press is part of our system of checks and balances - one of the few guarantors of democracy. But for the press to remain free, we need to preserve both the reality and the appearance of that freedom, and endorsements undermine that. "

Rich wrote on Aug 24, 2008 2:16 PM:

" NVR-Dan Ross, the paper has no business endorsing anyone. Just stick to factual unbiased reporting. "

funnyme wrote on Aug 24, 2008 2:59 PM:

" What's an endorsement?

Let's say NVR "endorses" B.O., what would that do to the outcome of the election?

Does it mean that because NVR endorses JMC will he be the next President?

What's the power behind an endorsement ? Isn't it just a way to voice what certain organization is in favor of? "

NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Aug 24, 2008 3:07 PM:

" Rich, and other expressing a similar opinion:
Do you feel the same way with every editorial produced through the Register's editorial board, where the board discusses an issue and offers an opinion on the matter, or only when it comes to endorsing cadndidates for election?
I ask for two reasons ... 1) I don't recall as many objections to the endorsements made in the last few election cycles where the editorial board made endorsements on all local, state and national races affecting Napa County. 2) I don't hear this sentiment about asking the Register's editorial board to avoid issuing opinions when editorials are written on local non-election issues. "

russ wrote on Aug 24, 2008 3:11 PM:

" Well done. There are a couple of issues I could add but you stated the most important issue to me.

NVR - "Our responsibility is to elect the person who is best suited to lead and defend the United States of America. That candidate must be a person of great character; someone who has demonstrated and will demonstrate courage, leadership, wisdom and calm under fire."

I have already made my decision. "

russ wrote on Aug 24, 2008 3:15 PM:

" I think the NVR and other news outlets have two separate and distinct responsibilities:

1) Un-biased and factual news reporting 2) Editorial opinion which is clearly stated as opinion, take it or leave it.

Many readers, listeners and watchers do not understand the difference. "

Rich wrote on Aug 24, 2008 3:25 PM:

" NVR-Dan Ross, I pretty much feel the same about all endorsements and recommendations made by the NVR because no matter how hard a person tries not to, the endorsement will always be tainted by personal feeling and party affiliation. "

Winewoman wrote on Aug 24, 2008 3:31 PM:

" Dan, Yes, I feel this way for local, state, national elections. As I stated, newspapers are supposed to be the independent, unbiased voices that chronicle the news. The fact that you haven't heard this sentiment before is irrelevent - it's entirely possible that people were thinking it, but did not venture to blog their opinion. If you truly want to remain and enjoy the benefits and freedoms as a member of the free press, then do your job and participate in the system of checks and balances that the public expects you to do. "

TrickleDown wrote on Aug 24, 2008 4:30 PM:

" Liberal bias!!! Where is common sense? Somehow, even though the NVR endorsed Bush in 2004 and possibly 2000, this is clearly another example of liberal bias in the media! "

NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Aug 24, 2008 4:36 PM:

" Rich and winewoman:
Thanks, do you feel the same for every editorial produced by the Register, or only for endorsements?
The newspaper takes stands on city council decisions and county supervisor decisions, for example. Should those opinions not be expressed in the Opinion section via the newspaper's editorial?
The news articles are written, regardless of an editorial appearing. "

Rich wrote on Aug 24, 2008 4:52 PM:

" NVR-Dan Ross, In short the NVR should report the news and the opinions should be those of the readers. That being said, I have no problem with the Register offering up an opinion after a decision has been made but not before. "

funnyme wrote on Aug 24, 2008 4:56 PM:

" Dan,
What does an endorsement from the newspaper's editorial on a presidential election mean?

What is the impact on the community with their OPINION/endorsement? "

kevin wrote on Aug 24, 2008 5:29 PM:

" The confusion comes from the fact that the media, especially TV news, freely mixes editorial opinon with the news (e.g.Dan Rather). As long as it's identified as editorial opinion, the NVR has every right to choose any or none or the candidates... "

common sense wrote on Aug 24, 2008 6:07 PM:

" TrickleDown says "Liberal bias!!! Where is common sense? Somehow, even though the NVR endorsed Bush in 2004 and possibly 2000, this is clearly another example of liberal bias in the media!"

-Actually, I've often stated that the Register does a pretty good job. Even so, I was pleasantly surprised when the Register endorsed Bush. On the occasions that the Register has veered left, I've made sure that my opinion was heard. However, liberal bias amongst other (bigger) media outlets, particularly the New York Times, CBS, and NBC, remains strong. Recent studies have shown this, along with the fact that Fox News has treated Obama much more fairly than liberals give them credit for. "

Dwayne wrote on Aug 24, 2008 7:01 PM:

" Realistically, doesn't the NVR endorsement affect the reporting of the election news, as well as the editing of reader's comments...???

Think about it... They don't do double-blind drug studies for no reason. Placebos are known to be effective more than 30% of the time. That simply means that an endorsement of a candidate sways public opinion, and votes. That cannot be denied.

Any claim that the media has no biased influence on voters is nothing but lip service, and undermines the integrity of journalism. We all know it, so denying it is futile. Editorializing an 'opinionated' endorsement as such is one thing, but denying that it affects the unbiased reporting of candidates is quite another.

Unfortunately, the NVR can have it both ways. They can endorse a candidate, yet claim their reporting is not biased against the opposing candidate. The implication is that the NVR's endorsement is to help dummies make up their minds. What an insult that is...

I know y'all will read this, and probably not post it, just because you don't want to deal with the truth. So be it. Be in lockstep with the rest of the media, and cram your opinion down everyone's throats, just because you can..... "

gypsy wrote on Aug 24, 2008 8:10 PM:

" What is this about "newspapers should only report the facts?" That's a big responsibility, but newspapers also provide the editorial page. This is where the people who report the news and presumably know a lot about what's happening give an educated opinion on various topics of importance. This is nothing new. Now, they shouldn't do it in fact-reporting stories, and the Register generally doesn't do that (although some of their young reporters include breathless adjectives in their work that occasionally miss editing). That's what the editorial section is reserved for. Of course, you can either read it or not, or agree with it or not, or use it to line your parrot's cage. But the allegation that newspapers shouldn't have commentaries written by their best researchers, writers, and editors? Bullfeathers. That's whose opinion I want to read, not the reactionary, half-baked, near-illiterate ramblings of anyone with paper, pen, and an axe to grind. I see enough of that on the online comment section (and online sources everywhere) - I expect more of my print sources, as we all should. But consider further: It's the editor who decides what's fit to print. In that case, you'd better have a good editor who will print the story you want to read as well as the one you don't. That, above all, is what the newspaper is about. And for God's sake...this is not an editorial anyway! Quit jumping the gun! "

TrickleDown wrote on Aug 24, 2008 10:40 PM:

" Ha ha! Common Sense: you have actually accused the NVR of liberal bias a number of times (12/12/2007, 06/27/2008, and others). Funny how they are biased when you don't agree with them but they "do a pretty good job...[unlike] the New York Times, CBS, and NBC" when you do. The boy who cried wolf, indeed. "

marine1/1 wrote on Aug 25, 2008 12:52 PM:

" NVR - Unbeleivable, you should stay neutral being you are a local newspaper. I wish the NVR would be purchased by a real news company that stayes neutral in these situations. We need reporters that get the whole story before publishing and write the stories that matter. The NVR in very one sided on many issues.I will be surprised if this makes the blog.If they do not agree with your opinion in blogs, they will not post it.It has happened several times. "

NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Aug 25, 2008 1:08 PM:

" marine 1/1:
Please let me know your real news company you are referring to that does not make endorsements in elections.
Our reporters do cover the elections, and their news articles are separate from the Opinion section of the newspaper.
As for your claim that your opinion must match ours for comments to appear, please contact me at dross@napanews.com and I will review with you each comment you claim was inappropriately rejected.
--Dan "

Raven wrote on Aug 25, 2008 5:04 PM:

" yeah I would be interested in knowing what that real news company is....some thing everyone seem to forget is the 'impartiality' of a newspaper is a recently phenom, newspapers were in many cases, funded by and devoted to espousing the viewpoints of a particular political faction or the pet causes and views of the local editor in the case of a small local newspaper...take a look at some of the papers in the early 19th century for a real eye-opener "

kevin wrote on Aug 26, 2008 7:07 PM:

" Kind of like where 'talk radio' is today. The bias is what makes it interesting. Maybe the papers should take note. They might actually turn around their declining sales figures... "

glenroy wrote on Aug 27, 2008 11:13 AM:

" Absolutely Kevin….when they deny the obvious it demises what little credibility that existed….which is the point in talk radio….get on with debating the issues and stop denying what is undeniably a waste of time. "

cellsitegod wrote on Aug 29, 2008 6:25 AM:

" Look at history,
How many politicians did William Raldolph Hearst put into office with his influence and conglomerate of newspapers.
It's nice to believe that newspapers are non-biased.
But, the reality is they take political sides. "

freeport56 wrote on Aug 29, 2008 10:14 AM:

" GO JOHN & SARAH! "

Dwayne wrote on Aug 29, 2008 10:52 AM:

" My respect for John McCain has improved greatly... In fact, now I'm all revved up... "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy