Strong demand for Riverfront living
The Riverfront has sold the first 10 condominiums in the project. 50 condos are planned, ranging in price from the high $600,000s to $1.67 million. The project is scheduled for an early 2009 completion. J.L. Sousa/Register |
Buy photos
First 10 downtown condos sell out in one day
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
November 26th, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
Mike DeSimoni’s gamble that affluent families will want to buy high-end riverfront condos in downtown Napa appears to be paying off.
Despite an ailing housing market, the first 10 residences in the Riverfront, a mixed-use project at Main and Third streets, sold out the day they were put on the market.
Buyers put down $10,000 deposits last week for units selling for between $695,000 and $1.67 million, with occupancy set for early 2009, said Michael Carreno, president of sales company the Reiser Group.
“People believe that living downtown is probably the way of the future,” said DeSimoni, whose family company, Channel Properties, is building two blocks of stores, restaurants, offices and condos. “I think they will all sell. It’s the uniqueness of the location.”
“If you’re looking for downtown, urban-style living, riverfront property, walking distance to restaurants and shops in Napa, where else are they going to go?” Carreno said.
“It’s incredible,” said Cassandra Walker, the city’s economic development manager. “It shows there is a market for downtown residential development, even in difficult times.”
“It clearly speaks to the value that people place on downtown and the river today and what’s in the future,” said Craig Smith, executive director of the Napa Downtown Association.
With its prominent river location, the Riverfront occupies pride of place in Napa’s fast-developing downtown, next to flood control improvements, including a pedestrian promenade and a redesigned Veteran’s Memorial Park. Plans are under way for more than $500 million in private development within walking distance of the Riverfront, including new hotels and office-retail projects.
But given the state of real estate today, pricing the first condos in an untested downtown market was tough, Carreno said. Had the project gone to market two years ago, residences might have sold for 10 to 15 percent more, he said.
The first 10 buyers include several who already live in Napa, several more who have second homes here, with the rest frequent Napa Valley visitors who like the wine country lifestyle, Carreno said.
One buyer is Bob Brosamer, owner of R&L Brosamer Inc., the general contractor who built the promenade and flood wall in front of the Riverfront for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
“We’re excited by the vision that both Mike and Harry Price (developer of Napa Mill next door) have for downtown,” Brosamer said. He reported paying “a lot” for a 1,700-square-foot, two-level, two-bedroom unit with river views.
“We’ll see the river. At high tide it looks great. At low tide it doesn’t look so great,” he said.
With its restaurants and spiffy new waterfront, downtown is “nice now, but it will do nothing but get better,” Brosamer said. He intends to use his condo as a weekend home and loan it out to friends.
“As I get a bit older, I could see myself slowing down and staying there three-four days a week,” he said.
The Riverfront will have 50 condos centered on a landscaped courtyard on the top two floors at the south end of the project. Residents will park in a two-story underground garage.
The next batch of 10 condos will be offered for sale in October. The Riverfront will open a full-time sales office in Alexandria Square, the commercial building that Channel Properties owns at Second and Brown streets.
Pricing is being established for the remaining 40 condos, which will range from 947 square feet to 2,123 square feet, Carreno said. Some could sell for under $500,000, he said.
Sales materials promote luxury living, with condos having hardwood floors, granite slab counter tops and high-end appliances. Buyers are able to customize amenities, Carreno said.
Napa Mayor Jill Techel said the city is promoting mixed-use development downtown, with the goal of creating a more lively city center.
“When we approved (Riverfront), we knew it would be more expensive,” Techel said. Future projects located a block or two from the river will be more affordably priced, she predicted.
Channel Properties said Morgan Stanley had leased 8,600 square feet of the project’s 30,000 square feet of office space. Negotiations are under way with “major restaurateurs” for portions of the project’s 40,000 square feet of retail.
More information on condo sales is available at riverfrontofnapa.com or by calling 252-5463. Commercial leasing information is at mspsinc.com.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
momtoo wrote on Sep 18, 2008 5:35 AM:
ADark1 wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:16 AM:
LOL!
Nice! "
db76 wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:58 AM:
Cadence wrote on Sep 18, 2008 7:10 AM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Sep 18, 2008 7:15 AM:
My image verification code was
iikky..
Ha!coinkydink! Or not? "
Kathy Concened wrote on Sep 18, 2008 7:33 AM:
jwk wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:06 AM:
MP wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:17 AM:
nscrgirl wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:32 AM:
yoyo wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:34 AM:
localmama wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:51 AM:
dcnapa wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:00 AM:
angrytoo wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:12 AM:
mominapa wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:33 AM:
It's mutton dressed up as lamb. Unbelieveable to me that people come here just because it is NAPA VALLEY. Big screaming deal. We are just a small town with small town problems. Can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. Lipstickon a pig. "
vanappan wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:59 AM:
Second item: the main reason the Napa River is the muddy brown river it is and has been for over a 100 years. After the 1906 earthquake, barges were sent in from San Francisco and all of the river rock was dredged to rebuild the City
The Napa River was not the only victim.
Is a hundred years to late for a class action lawsuit, perhaps we can sue for damages done???? I heard John Edwards is looking for a job. "
skiph wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:01 AM:
bennyd wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:19 AM:
jimmie wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:21 AM:
notshocked wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:24 AM:
I read such hypocricy in many complaints in various article comments-- "downtown Napa is dead"... "tourists blow by".... and then when things are done to create more stickiness there, people line up to poo poo the idea. At the end of the day, you all have a choice on where you live. I would live in Napa in a heart beat, but my job took me elsewhere and I am resigned to only visit when I can. I think I'm a native, but I'm pretty sure most of the commenting people here would just as soon spit on me than welcome me. Sad.
Rather than complain about the river, why not find a way to appreciate it... clean it up even!? "
Jenn wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:39 AM:
Native74 wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:40 AM:
I just wish they would put the dock back in (promised this past July and not delivered...) At least I can boat down, dock and then walk to restaurants, but that'll probably be another 10 years. It took us that long to get the first dock installed!!!! "
psoren wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:50 AM:
glenroy wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:57 AM:
NAPGRL55 wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:05 AM:
psychochik wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:31 AM:
Come on people, the negative nancies are making the rest of us look bad. This is an opportunity to hopefully bring some life to our slumping downtown area. Jeez, seriously, if its that bad then please, by all means, leave and let the rest of us enjoy our town. "
selim wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:32 AM:
Man, is it sad seeing all these "sour-grapes" people deluding themselves that these condos won't be nice, or that somehow the "real" Napans are looking down on the people who are buying them. I can't afford one right now, but the idea of living & working downtown is appealing, especially when you see what is being developed in the immediate area.
I guess these "real Napans" would prefer that we just kept that site vacant, populated only with weeds and an undersized parking lot? Downtown is slowly improving, and it's about time. Once the flood project completes we'll see a significantly different river area.
And this whole "real blue collar Napan" vs. "anyone not born & raised here who makes more than $150K/year" is tiresome and simply infantile. Grow up, folks. Never leaving your hometown is not exactly something to be proud of, you know. "
cordell wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:36 AM:
kittyamma wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:50 AM:
go raiders "
comment wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:55 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:05 PM:
If these had been a couple of hundred thousand less expensive, I may have considered buying one myself. I think these condos will be an excellent investment and will contribute greatly toward the economic health of the downtown area. "
5TH GENERATION NAPAN wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:24 PM:
SouthNapa wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:30 PM:
Napa Mom wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:37 PM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Sep 18, 2008 1:18 PM:
Maya wrote on Sep 18, 2008 1:57 PM:
jt wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:09 PM:
the same could be said about these condos as could be said about structures in walnut creek, redwood city, or san rafael. big deal!!! put a mercede's or bmw dealership next door.
if the developer can make money of these more power to them.
flooding must not be a probem in that part of town. who'd want to pay the credit market for a place that had a flooded basement. "
mominapa wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:42 PM:
mominapa wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:43 PM:
St.Hell.comNative wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:50 PM:
napan79 wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:01 PM:
abouttime wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:06 PM:
yamamama wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:26 PM:
skippert wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:53 PM:
napan79 wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:10 PM:
shareathought wrote on Sep 18, 2008 5:37 PM:
If we cared we'd be there for the Coastal Cleanup day this Saturday, September 20, 2008 from 9 am to 12 pm, here in Napa
(for more information one can google: RCD, Napa and Ca). This is a part of a coast to coast or creek to coast clean-up nationwide).
Or we would pick a park or main route in the area to pick-up (for example Imola, Jefferson, or Soscol).
But then again, perhaps we aren't thinking caring human beings, but only whiners. "
Joe wrote on Sep 18, 2008 5:47 PM:
cameltoedoc wrote on Sep 18, 2008 5:57 PM:
iaiguy wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:44 PM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Sep 18, 2008 7:07 PM:
musikluvr wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:14 PM:
comment wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:51 PM:
I don't know where you get the thought that the homeless urinate in this area, mominapa. I am in this area almost daily and have never seen unexplained puddles in the street.
I hope Mr. DeSimoni gives the locals a tour of some of these units. While I think they are very expensive, I'm sure they're going to beautiful homes. I wish I could afford to live there. I wonder how many of you "haters" will patronize the great businesses that should be moving into the first floor space? "
newjoeman wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:12 PM:
AmCanResident wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:19 PM:
chunk wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:07 PM:
Duck wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:32 PM:
Joe wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:32 PM:
misfit wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:17 PM:
WorksInNapa wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:24 PM:
I also enjoy the Napa River. I don't think I've ever seen a tide river which had clear water. During my hikes along the river trails I may catch the odor of a dead fish but I don't recall any bad odors from the waters themselves. I'd love to live next to the river.
The so called "homeless" are a real problem. I give two big thumbs up for the real homeless whom are trying to better themselves. I personally know "homeless" whom wish to live that way and won't accept free rooms from family members to get off the streets. I wish there were a better name to call them rather than grouping them with the "I don't want to be homeless" homeless people.
During my hikes I sometimes go down to the river bank where one might expect to see a little trash such as worm containers and bottles. Instead you see piles of baby dipers, used TP, uprooted plants to make room for bedding, discarded clothing, sleeping bags, needles, shoping carts, tents and yes, it can stink of urine. We should help those few whom desire and need help to get back on their feet. But the others need to be addessed also. This nice river can become a beautiful river which the whole family could enjoy.
Those whom can afford it are taking advantage of living next to this river. I'll say, "Good for them!" and really mean "
cellsitegod wrote on Sep 19, 2008 7:04 AM:
It will keep Napa exclusive, raise the value of my property.
And keep out the "un-desirables"
Then, maybe Napa can stay low crime. "
Localnapa wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:30 AM:
amazed wrote on Sep 19, 2008 12:30 PM:
lakeco wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:54 PM:
and maya,.....they do have more money than brains "
napan007 wrote on Sep 22, 2008 1:14 PM:
I think our food is better though. :) "
14obama wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:45 PM:
14obama wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:06 PM: