NVR Logo
New plan for Angwin eco-village
On Tuesday, PUC, Triad to unveil ‘major changes’ to project
Friday, September 19, 2008
Save and Share Share
More changes are on the way for the controversial Angwin eco-village.

Pacific Union College and development partner Triad Communities are considering major changes to the proposed project, according to a press release, “including a further reduction of houses, removal of units previously planned for ball fields at the town entrance, and a retirement center.”
Details will be unveiled at a public meeting from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. Tuesday, Sept. 23, at the Howell Mountain Elementary School multi-use room in Angwin. A second informational meeting will be held the following night at the same place and time.

The adjustments appear to focus on the “village square” area of the project, adjacent to Howell Mountain Road.
“In the existing configuration, there are (residential) units planned for the ball fields,” said Peter Bartelme, spokesman for PUC and Triad. “In the revised plan that we’d like community input about, the ball fields remain to maintain that area as open space upon entering Angwin.”

“For the past two months, we have been meeting with a small group of highly-respected community members, including members of the opposition group Save Rural Angwin, to listen carefully to their concerns about the eco-village and their ideas for making the project better,” said Chad Kiltz, project manager for Triad. “Based on suggestions from the participants in those meetings, we are now considering major changes to the eco-village.”
When PUC and Triad officials first announced the project in 2006, their plans included 591 housing units, as well as upgrades to campus and to the small commercial area in Angwin. The building designs include water- and energy-saving features to minimize demand for natural resources.

After Angwin residents and others raised concerns about the size of the project and potential traffic, and after it became the center of attention during the county’s general plan update, the number of homes was reduced to 380.

Allen Spence of Save Rural Angwin was skeptical about the changes to be unveiled Tuesday night. He said plans show that 105 of the project’s residential units are being converted to retirement units.

“We are pleased that the development is continuing to evolve and we look forward to fully understanding the new configuration,” said Spence. “We know that there is some sentiment, in Angwin, favoring a retirement facility — but 275 homes plus 105 retirement units (380 in total, like the current proposal) is not a significant change. Hopefully they have actually made significant changes since they last met with their small group.”

College officials say the money generated by the eco-village project is needed to build the college endowment and allow PUC to remain financially viable.

Opponents say any development in excess of the 191 units already pre-approved by the county will strain local infrastructure and destroy Angwin’s rural character.

The environmental impact report for the project is expected to be completed by the end of the year. The Napa County Board of Supervisors will have the final say on the project.

For information about the project go to www.angwin-ecovillage.com. To learn about the opposition group, visit www.saveruralangwin.org.´
10 comment(s)

jt wrote on Sep 19, 2008 10:39 AM:

" This is still a terrible idea in terms of space and planning considering there are 100'rds of square acres in Pope Valley, and over toward Berryessa. It is clearly being done out of the sole desires, personal yearnings and uncapabilities of a small group of people that keep this thing going on and on and on. I hope a bunch of people get in head on collisions driving down Howell Mtn. as a result. I can't wait to have 4 corners backed up for 45 minutes when all I wanted was a fricken fruit stand for some vegetables. Jerks!!! "

PUC Prof wrote on Sep 19, 2008 2:30 PM:

" Pope Valley has less infrastructure and fewer jobs than Angwin. I hope nobody ever gets into a head-on collision and that there will never be a 45-minute backup of traffic anywhere near Angwin. "

MikeK wrote on Sep 19, 2008 2:44 PM:

" lol

How dare people being injured affect your dinner plans.

How thoughtless of them. "

shgirl wrote on Sep 19, 2008 3:07 PM:

" regardless of what your opinion is, wishing people get in head on collisions is in disgusting + in poor taste. i hope it isn't you or someone you love. "

kkjp wrote on Sep 19, 2008 3:08 PM:

" To hope that the project will result in people getting in head-on car wrecks demonstrates how radical beyond reason opponents have become. "

jt wrote on Sep 19, 2008 3:47 PM:

" it is disgusting. i agree. it's sick. think first rain of the year. think people coming home drunk. think families and young drivers. think no jobs or services in angwin. think. think. think. and these are the same people who originally proposed 350 homes, which had the potential of bringing 700 car and drivers to an area. "

jt wrote on Sep 19, 2008 5:18 PM:

" I agree with JT on this one. I'm sure JT doesn't really want to see people die. JT is probably just trying to make you think a little more seriously about things, because JT knows the dangers of Wine, Rain, Roads and people from out of town who don't know how to control their habits. "

jt wrote on Sep 19, 2008 5:21 PM:

" I'm not trying to kiss anybodies Tuchis but if you'd please just listen to what JT says you might gain knowledge. JT has been a great shepherd. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Sep 19, 2008 8:14 PM:

" kkjp, give me a break. Radical opponents? Ok so one person makes an insensitive comment and now EVERYONE who disagrees with this project is RADICAL? That's a very big leap, but not surprising from a Triad supporter. "

mamyt wrote on Sep 19, 2008 8:23 PM:

" I think JT is suffering from a split personality disorder. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy