Father sues over teen drowning
Labor Day 2007 tragedy at Berryessa draws civil suit
By MARSHA DORGAN
Register Staff Writer
October 5th, 2009
September 18th, 2009
September 17th, 2009
September 13th, 2009
September 12th, 2009
November 26th, 2009
November 25th, 2009
November 24th, 2009
November 22nd, 2009
The father of a teen whose blood alcohol level was .17 percent when she drowned at Lake Berryessa has filed a wrongful death suit against the girl’s mother and several others who were present at the Labor Day 2007 outing.
Troy Brookman, the biological father of 13-year-old Erin Brookman, filed a civil lawsuit in Napa County courts against the girl’s mother, Susan Jones, and four other people who were with the teen on the day she died of the combined effects of alcohol and carbon monoxide poisoning caused by boat engine fumes.
Others named in the lawsuit are Deborah Ferolito, Robert Hansel, Donovan Burgess and Eric Persson.
According to the lawsuit, Ferolito owned the “party barge where she and Hansel consumed significant amounts of alcohol and permitted several minors, including Erin Brookman, to also consume significant amounts of alcohol both at the campsite and on the boat.”
Erin Brookman was at the lake with family and friends who gathered on several boats near the Pope Creek Bridge. She and a female friend were in the water on the swimming platform on the rear of Ferolito’s boat. They were not wearing life jackets, according to the lawsuit. They went to another ski boat owned by Eric Persson, which according to the lawsuit had its engine idling so they could listen to music on their stereos.
The lawsuit claims that Erin Brookman and her friend went to Persson’s boat and held onto the wooden step at the back of his boat for several minutes.
Brookman’s friend became sick from the exhaust fumes and climbed into boat, according to the lawsuit, adding, while attending to her, Brookman also became ill from the exhaust fumes and slipped under the water.
A search for Brookman was unsuccessful and her body was found the next day, which would have been her 14th birthday.
Troy Brookman’s attorney, John Demas of Sacramento, said the lawsuit focuses mainly on the dangers of leaving boat motors running when swimmers are in close proximity.
“A law was passed this past year prohibiting boat owners from running their motors when boats are moored or not moving. We want to get the word out that this is a very dangerous situation which in this case caused a young girl to lose her life,” Demas said.
Demas said although alcohol was a factor in Brookman’s death, the carbon monoxide poisoning was enough to cause the teen to die.
Napa County Sheriff’s Capt. Jean Donaldson said the criminal investigation into Brookman’s death is closed.
“Our investigation was reviewed by the district attorney’s office and they felt there was not enough evidence to file criminal charges,” Donaldson said. “There were allegations that adults provided alcohol to the minors, but we did not find any evidence to substantiate those allegations.”
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Skeptically Watching wrote on Oct 16, 2008 6:07 AM:
Just because Sheriff's investigators couldn't come up with any evidence minors were being supplied with alcohol by adults, doesn't mean it didn't happen. She came there with adults, was in the presence of adults when she died, and had a .17 BAC. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck...it's probalby a duck. These adults, including her mother, should be held fully responsible for this child's death. "
napathoughts wrote on Oct 16, 2008 7:25 AM:
LocalNapa wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:51 AM:
napabicycler wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:08 AM:
Paddy wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:16 AM:
cordell wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:53 AM:
mafi wrote on Oct 16, 2008 12:07 PM:
Froggie1559 wrote on Oct 16, 2008 2:13 PM:
opiniagirl wrote on Oct 16, 2008 2:24 PM:
Who is anyone to say what he should do in response. A messasge must be sent to adults that contribute to dangerous behavior, even if it is a parent.
I am wondering why there isn't a negligence charge agains mom - who was present and could have easily prevented the childs alcohol consumption is it was truly unauthorized. .17 is twice the legal limit, how could anyone not recognize an impaired "drunk" child. Someone must have noticed and nobody DID anything...it was mom's job to notice, since she was the adult in charge of her own child.
If this situation had been different and the child stole a car and ran over someone, the book would have been thrown at the adults present...but since she only killed herself...we let it slide? "
707jng wrote on Oct 16, 2008 3:28 PM:
If I were this father I would probably do the same thing he is. Maybe this is his way of finding closure because it couldn't be proved that the adults gave these kids alcohol... "
opiniagirl wrote on Oct 16, 2008 4:00 PM:
Annabella wrote on Oct 16, 2008 4:29 PM:
opiniagirl wrote on Oct 16, 2008 4:44 PM:
You're not suggesting that this father has limited rights because he is listed as "biological", which sometimes indicates absent or uninvolved, though not always...
Even if he was, although it would have been VERY unfotunate for him, this does not mean that he would not have been a great father in the future given the chance.
My Bio dad ran around on my mom, divorced her, never saw us, ran away from child support, offerred his teens pot, married 4 other women in a row, and partied until I was about 22. Now he is settled in a wonderful solid marraige and is a phenominal husband father and grandfather.
This dad will never have that chance with his daughter!
That says it all! "
Napa7192 wrote on Oct 16, 2008 6:57 PM:
Annabella wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:19 PM:
opiniagirl wrote on Oct 17, 2008 11:13 AM:
No not liberal, just human and open to forgiveness and change. Compassion is what seperates us from the apes!
My mother and bio dad are both happily remarried and they still speak to eachother with respect and loving kindness, we even celebrate holidays as 1 large family. My mother holds no bitterness against him, which says oodles about her as a strong Christian woman.
No amount of money in the world can replace what this father lost, but it can ease the pain and send a strong messsage. If he truly was an absent father, he will carry that burden for the rest of his life whether he drives it around in a pinto or a Mercedes.
My best friends "biological" dad was a wonderful father and her stepdad was horrific! So when used for clarification "biological" may not always be what you think.
We don't know if he was unwilling to be the girls father, I have not seen that issue addressed to the public other than "biological", which could simply be an adjective for clarification purposes.
You know that saying about when you assume.... "
amazed wrote on Oct 17, 2008 12:49 PM:
LakeGirl wrote on Oct 17, 2008 1:29 PM:
cellsitegod wrote on Oct 24, 2008 6:23 AM:
Shame on the father capitalizing on it.
The mother knows she is responsible for her daughters death regardless of being charged.
By sueing here her in court proves nothing. Other than proving the father is out to make a buck! "
james10000 wrote on Nov 15, 2008 2:37 PM:
drowningkarma wrote on Nov 21, 2008 11:56 AM:
I hope this dad gets justice through making these criminals pay monetarily. They must have some money if they were boat owners. I don't know how the 13 year old victim's mother lives with herself knowing that if she had kept a better eye on her daughter and not let her drink alcohol she would still be here today. This story is just tragic all the way around.... "
parent wrote on Nov 26, 2008 9:13 PM: