One goes on, one is done
-
-
img
Napa High’s Charles Boyett is congratulated by teammate Louie Alvarez after Boyett ran in a first-half touchdown in Big Game XXXVII on Friday night at Memorial Stadium. J.L. Sousa/Register photos |
Buy photos
-
img
Daniel Burgess of Napa High School tackles Reed Huddleston of Vintage High School after Huddleston picked up short yardage on a pass play late in the first half in Big Game XXXVII on Friday night at Memorial Stadium. |
Buy photos
Indians clinch home-field advantage
By ANDY WILCOX
Register Sports Writer
November 16th, 2008
November 15th, 2008
November 14th, 2008
November 13th, 2008
November 12th, 2008
November 30th, 2008
November 29th, 2008
November 28th, 2008
November 27th, 2008
November 26th, 2008
November 23rd, 2008
November 29th, 2008
November 16th, 2008
November 15th, 2008
November 14th, 2008
November 13th, 2008
November 12th, 2008
The Napa High football team had no idea it would be facing a cross-town rival and crosswinds at the same time in Big Game XXXVII on Friday night.
Vintage quarterback Sean Ryan, meanwhile, had little trouble passing in the incessant breeze. His receivers just had a problem catching them.
In a mistake-filled but entertaining at a chock-full Memorial Stadium, Napa weathered its gaffes better than the Crushers and pulled away in the second half for a 24-7 win.
The victory clinched homefield advantage through the first three rounds of the CIF Sac-Joaquin Section Division I playoffs for the Indians (9-1 overall, 5-0 MEL) in their bid to repeat as section champs.
Napa attempted only one pass all first half, Charles Boyett’s seventh attempt of the season, as the Indians looked to grind out yards behind their veteran offensive line.
“In the first half, we started out with the wind in our faces, and it was a stiff breeze,” Napa head coach Troy Mott said. “We had a couple of pass-scripted plays, but we felt we could handle them up front, too, so we made adjustments with formations in our running game and it worked out.”
Napa controlled time of possession by 31⁄2 minutes in the first half and took a 10-7 lead into the break in front of a crowd of 6,800, as announced by Napa High Principal Barb Franco.
Vintage (4-6 overall, 2-3 MEL) helped the Indians out by dropping three fairly accurate long balls from quarterback Sean Ryan. The first one, on the Crushers’ first play from scrimmage, didn’t end up hurting them, as Ryan came back two plays later with a 26-yard completion to Jacob Roscoe to the Napa 11-yard line. Roscoe (12 carries, 50 yards) juked his way into the end zone on the next play and Jonny Avalos threaded the PAT for a 7-0 lead with 8:44 left in the first quarter.
The second drop came on the first drive of the third quarter and was followed by Andrew O’Shaughnessy’s sack of Ryan and a punt to the Vintage 35. Brandon Washington ironically dropped a sure Clinton Gorsuch TD pass on the next play, but Logan Hess ran it in from the 10 four plays later for a 17-7 lead with 7:12 left in the third quarter.
The third drop was in the end zone in the final seconds of the third quarter, with Vintage still trailing 17-7. It forced the Crushers to attempt a 39-yard field goal that was botched, as holder Paul Archer was tackled at the 30 by Michael Ruffino.
Vintage head coach Billy Smith said the drops didn’t really surprise him.
“That’s how our season has gone and that’s why we finished 4-6,” he said. “Plays you’ve got to make we just didn’t make. If we had, it would have been a whole different ball game.”
Ryan finished just 8-of-17 passing for 92 yards and 11 carries for 63 yards in his high school finale.
“It’s sad for Sean because he did extremely well tonight,” Smith said. “He made a few mental mistakes but he made a lot of great reads. I’m so proud of him. He’s done a lot of good things at Vintage.”
Mott agreed that the drops were a factor. “They just outran us down the field on those,” he said.
The Indians responded with a 70-yard, 15-play scoring march that ate up just over eight minutes. Charles Boyett (20 carries 129 yards) carried four times during the drive and Hess (15 carries, 88 yards) carried seven times and gained another 21 yards on a shovel pass.
Possibly expecting Boyett to run it in from the 1, the Indians instead had Boyett take a pitch from Clinton Gorsuch and throw a strike to 6-foot-7 Ben Ballantine in the right side of the end zone. Max Alvarez — who kicked a 39-yard field goal in the second quarter — added his third PAT for a 24-7 lead with 4:17 left, all but deciding the outcome.
Vintage had the early momentum, scoring on a 50-yard field after usually sure-footed punter Max Alvarez shanked his first one out of bounds. But special teams also turned the momentum back Napa’s way. On the Crushers’ second drive, Ballantine stormed in and partially blocked Bryson Daniels’ punt and David Smith fell on it at the 50.
“That’s the first punt I’ve been able to go in on all year,” Ballantine said. “There was no one (blocking) on my side. In a Big Game, everything is momentum.”
Boyett ran three yards and then 47 for the tying touchdown, breaking several tackles on the way with 12 seconds left in the opening quarter.
Along with some of Ryan’s best passes getting dropped, he was sacked four other times — by Smith, C.J. Blom, Daniel Burgess and Louie Alvarez.
“We came out in the second half pumped up,” Napa offensive guard Justin Ruffino said.
“My motto is ‘relentless.’ We linemen had confidence we would be able to take control in the second half.”
For Smith, it was a tough way to finish after a promising start to the game.
The Crushers had a chance to tie it by halftime, but Ryan was stopped by Washington at the 2 with the final seconds ticking away, and a bad hold resulted in Avalos’ kick getting blocked by Washington.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
sigep739 wrote on Nov 15, 2008 12:25 AM:
Only if Laguna Creek loses (and Napa wins) will Napa have homefield in round 2... and, consequently, all the rounds.
The funny thing is that if Napa wins that game and goes to round three, then it is guaranteed a home game in round 3... because the only number one seed in the North bracket other than Napa is Pleasant Grove of DRL. The MEL has home field over DRL.
It is a confusing system.. and not subjective at all... but that is how the cook crumbles... look at the brackets below and be sure to check out the bottom where it has the stars. "
Napa Coach wrote on Nov 15, 2008 12:51 AM:
You're wrong on this one. In the second and third rounds, the team with the best record if they are the same seeds gets to host. Napa will host as long as they keep winning. Go back and reread the section website.
INJUN BORN, INJUN BRED, AND WHEN I DIE, I'LL BE INJUN DEAD!!!
I hope this puts to rest who the best program in Napa is. A 10-0 JV team equaled out to a 4-6 varsity team. "
Dirty Napkin wrote on Nov 15, 2008 5:16 AM:
sportsfan wrote on Nov 15, 2008 6:59 AM:
Standings
Overall M.E.L.
TEAM W L W L
Napa 9 1 5 0
Vacaville 7 3 4 1
Fairfield 6 4 3 2
Vintage 4 6 2 3
Wood 3 7 1 4
Armijo 3 7 0 5
Last Week Scores
Vintage 7
Napa 24
Vacaville 28
Wood 27
Fairfield 52
Armijo 23
This Weeks Playoff Games
Folsom @ Napa
Vacaville @ Nevada Union (probably)
Fairfield @ Pleasant Grove "
bandit wrote on Nov 15, 2008 7:42 AM:
That is exactly what happened! JV football is a completely different world from Varsity football. It's too bad the Vintage principal listened to the parents of these kids when they produced a petition to get rid of the previous varsity staff so the coaches of the 10-0 JV wonder-kids could lead them to the promised land and get all of them fullride scholarships to Division 1 colleges. It's obvious that the "JV" staff has been completely overmatched in their two varsity seasons. "
noblindershere wrote on Nov 15, 2008 11:43 AM:
calbear21 wrote on Nov 15, 2008 12:30 PM:
bandit wrote on Nov 15, 2008 1:29 PM:
You obviously missed my point. You are exactly correct. One of the reasons the parents wanted the previous varsity staff at Vintage dismissed was that they did not get enough D1 scholarships for their players. That and they actually had enough gall to hold the players accountable for their actions on and off the field. Parents are so unrealistic. There are not a lot of scholarships out there for 5'-7" QBs or DBs that run 5.1. Please reread what I originally wrote. And you are correct also about the attitude of the 10-0 wonderkids. "
napanana wrote on Nov 15, 2008 2:22 PM:
I may have Vintage Crusher ties now, but I was and am and Indian in my bones....and for the first time ...I am embarassed. Maybe I am just old.........but what happened to respect on the field guys? "
sigep739 wrote on Nov 15, 2008 4:18 PM:
sigep739 wrote on Nov 15, 2008 4:21 PM:
I am really anxious to see FHS beat PGHS (not only for the rematch) but for more respect for the MEL.
All of you should go to SacBee.com and continuously post on their forums that they should go back to covering MEL schools. "
sigep739 wrote on Nov 15, 2008 7:19 PM:
Napa Coach wrote on Nov 15, 2008 9:37 PM:
spdnpwr5 wrote on Nov 15, 2008 9:52 PM:
Off topic but anyways..
I think it's funny that everyone here thinks that just because you go to high school in Napa that there is no way you'll receive a scholarship. The problem is most players, coaches, fans, parents think that YOU HAVE to get D-1A scholarship or OH NO it's not respectable.. Get a grip, it's still football, paid education, etc; a chance most players/kids would dream of.
There is also nothing wrong with going the JUCO route for 2 years after high school-- there are quite a few former Napa/Vintage players who are excelling at the D1 and D2 level after playing JC football.
Marquis Hundley- Arizona, CB
Ryan Galovic- Weber St, MLB
Brock Daniels- Cal Poly, Guard
Ian Hetrick- Wyoming, QB
Kyle Fulford- Northern State, DE
John Shackford- Portland State, DE
James Hartley- ECSU, C
Carl Liponavich- Northern State, T
Mike Gibson- CAL and now NFL
Kyle Aber- Cal Poly, Safety/OLB
Zach Diaz- Portland State
The list could go on but this is all off the top of my head... most of these players listed are from class of '03-'05..
I think if you checked your ego at the door and be realistic everyone would just relax and have fun-- this is freakin high school football. "
sgtstedanko08 wrote on Nov 15, 2008 11:31 PM:
napavalfan wrote on Nov 16, 2008 2:35 AM:
kracker wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:51 AM:
sgtstedanko08 wrote on Nov 16, 2008 12:02 PM:
1NapaFF wrote on Nov 16, 2008 6:23 PM:
spdnpwr5 >>> I agree, JUCO is certainly a way to go if one needs some time to refine their skills and/or attract attention. There are plenty of NFL players that came from JUCO's or Div II schools, none more famous than Jerry Rice, from Div II Mississippi Valley State. Even locally ... Ken O'Brien spent his college career at Sac State and UC Davis and later became a 1st Round Draft choice in the NFL.
On another note ... Napa JV beat Vintage JV 34-14 and Napa Freshman (9-0 for the season, outscoring their opponents 325-70!) also won their "Little" Big Game, 32-7, so Napa Varsity has a rather bright future, too!
sgtstedanko08 ... You're right, Folsom is a VERY good team, but hey, that's why they're in the playoffs. By the way ... I just checked and VINTAGE, apparently, DID NOT MAKE THE PLAYOFFS - that's a shame - so, regardless of whether "Napa will be one & done," as you say … I hope YOU don't get a tummy ache drinking your SOUR GRAPES next week while I'm at Memorial Stadium next Friday night, watching NAPA in the first round of the playoffs; you know … in case you need to reach me!! "
WhatWhat wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:10 PM:
WhatWhat wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:33 PM:
bornin74 wrote on Nov 17, 2008 12:03 PM:
Napa H.S. runs one heck of a football program, everyone can see that by the product put on the field.
It has taken YEARS to get to this point though. Coach Mott did not just miraculously show up one day and POOF GREAT PROGRAM. Napa was an average team for years, and Coach Mott was on staff!.
Napa has had a great run of ATHLETES come through the doors. Without ATHLETES you cannot win, I don't care if you are the 2nd coming of Vince Lombardi.
Vintage going 10-0 at the JV level means nothing. Coach Smith was promoted after 14 years of coaching Freshman and JV football. The previous coach was not "ousted" by parents, the program needed a new direction, as the old direction was "tired" and the kids were not responding. PERIOD.
Napa has some very good kids in the pipeline, but the refernce made above about Freshman going 9-0 and that translates holds no water either. Becuase Napa's JV team only lost ONE Game last year as Freshman and look at this year, BARELY over .500!.
Napa's JV Team sputtered this year, the Freshman team (albeit 9-0) was one of the weakest teams we have seen in a while. They played a SOFT SCHEDULE, just ask the Head Coach, he will tell you that. The Score for the Frosh game was 32-7 BUT (see you have to know the game here) Vintage was ahead 7-6 with 9 minutes left in the game!. The scores for all BIG GAMES this year was not indicative of how the games were played!.
Watch out in the next couple of years Vintage is on an up cycle! "
napavalfan wrote on Nov 17, 2008 2:51 PM:
calbear21 wrote on Nov 18, 2008 9:32 AM:
As for the kids "not responding" to the previous staff, you need only look to 2005 to see that your statement is just erronious. I think those kids responded just fine with an M.E.L. championship and upset of Napa. They were competitive, disciplined, hard-working, and believed in what was being taught. PERIOD. "
napavalfan wrote on Nov 18, 2008 10:42 AM:
bornin74 wrote on Nov 18, 2008 12:55 PM:
Coach Franco is/was one of the best coaches in this Valley, I still see him on occassion and I cannot get away from still addressing him as "coach" nearly 20 years later!
Coach Franco was my coach @ Napa back in the day, until my jr. year when he was
"stabbed in the back by selfish parents and fired by a horrible administration"
(At least that is what we thought at the time, to later find out the REAL REASON, which I do not need to bring up here). I then had both of my brothers go through Coach Franco @ Vintage, graduating in '03. Very disciplined, hard working program. I agree.
Here is the catch, as it relates to the current Vintage program and the experience I had.....
When you change head coaches, there are still players left in the pipeline (Jr.,Soph, & Freshman) who have "bought in" to the previous regime. When you bring in a new coach, even if he was on staff previously (Coach Herlocker in '91 & Coach Smith in '07, both on staff coaches) they will want to bring their own "flavor" or something totally different to the program.
H.S. kids are VERY LOYAL especially when they have "bought in". Coach Herlocker's record his first few seasons as a Varsity coach was not BAD, but it wasn't GREAT, UNTIL he got "his kids" (9th graders up to Varsity, playing "his program"). The same is holding true for Coach Smith. His Junior class this year is still Coach Franco's Freshman Team. He still does not have "his" kids at the Varsity level yet. "
bornin74 wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:11 PM:
What was his record the LAST YEAR he coached, in 2006? I think 5-5 or something like that. JV's were 10-0 and Freshman were 0-9 (this years' juniors)It does not matter what the records of lower level teams are. What matters is if they "BUY IN" and develop up to the varsity level. The current JV and Frosh teams have "bought in", and we can now sit back and watch them develop.Coach Smith will not even have "his kids" from top to bottom until 2010. Let's see from 2010 on how Vintage looks..... you just may see 2 powerful schools again.
Remember, you still must have athletes come through the door, and our little city goes through ups and downs at both schools Napa has an upswing for a few years and then Vintage.... Look at the records for the two schools in any sport over 30 years, you can see the ebb & flow. Coach Mott will experience this as well, at some point, will you all be calling for his head? or realize the dynamics of the situation and ride it out? For most I would guess "off with his head" "
Nation 1 wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:41 PM:
napafoot08 wrote on Nov 18, 2008 1:46 PM:
Vintage its not the coaches fault why they arent good or get D-1 scholarships its the kids. The kids arent good thats all. This is a very small town and for kids to be know they have to attend JC ball like most have besides Boyett.
I give credit to Coach Smith for giving his all these past season, but Vintage football has been done even before Franco left.
Back to now Napa all they need to do is play like a team and will have a good chance to win. they have NO player makers or big names at all. Charles Boyett is ok but not a player to count on. HIgh school football is just weak this year and i have seen it. Folsom is a great team but Napa will hopfully pull it off. "
kracker wrote on Nov 18, 2008 4:01 PM:
napafoot08 wrote on Nov 18, 2008 4:08 PM:
02-Aaron Hundley & Buddy Connor (which both dont play anomore)
03-Mike Gibson, Thomas Sims, Marquis Hundley & Ryan Galavic (which 3 of these still play)
04-Kevin Robledo & Andre Lamaruwax (one only plays now)
05- Andrew Frasier
06-Linden Fowler &Scott Johnson (only one plays)
07-John Boyett & Jake Croxdale (both still play)
Vintage im not really sure of i know there is:
02-John Shackford
03-Ian Hetrick, Kyle Aber,Kyle Fulford, Brock Daniels
04-Carl Liponavich & Zack Diaz
05-Kevin Harrell
06-??
07-??
the rosters per year at both schools are about 60 players, and an avg of 2 a year keep playing? My point here is that parents need to stop thinking that COLLEGE FOOTBALL is so easy to play and so easy to do! NAPA DOESNT COME OUT WITH THAT MANY GOOD PLAYERS THAT GO ON AND PLAY COLLEGE FOOTBALL. i know its your guys kids but when seein players outside of napa ot hsould open our eyes. Sac, Vallejo, Oakland, San Francisco players from there are more common to go then here cuz they are know. its in the player to get himself out of here and continue on playing not the parents. so sstop making it sound so easy and face it. kids in this town are good for this league but outside of it and real football? they cant do it. "
1NapaFF wrote on Nov 20, 2008 2:16 AM:
To quote you … "the Napa freshmen team was one of the weakest teams we've seen in a while." That, my friend, does NOT hold up. What's "weak" about a 9-0 record? What's "weak" about a schedule that includes teams like Merced (38-16), Rocklin (40-6), and Vacaville (32-7), not to mention Vintage (32-7) … and outscoring them 142-36!
I don't know how many games you actually saw, but I saw all nine … and they had terrific athletes at the "skill" positions & SOLID line play, allowing their linebackers to pursue, shutting down the run.
Yes, the Vintage game score after 3-quarters WAS 7-6, but football, I believe, is played for four quarters! How 'bout conditioning wore Vintage down? Maybe Napa was more disciplined? Saying Vintage was winning 7-6 after 3-quarters is like saying a baseball score after 7-innings, ignoring the fact they play nine!!
I don't know if you have kids, but at this age they need discipline (a recent issue at Vintage), leadership, and effective communication, including active listening.
The point of all this is that it's not ONLY the talent and athletic ability the kids bring to the program(s). It involves effective, caring yet disciplined, coaching and the ability to bring out the best in all the players on the roster, top to bottom.
One last comment … playing college football is certainly not a given just because one plays in HS, but I think scouts are taking a more serious look at BOTH programs now, thanks, in part, to John Boyett. "
surfdogge69 wrote on Nov 22, 2008 2:10 AM:
Where are you now old buddy????? "
spdnpwr5 wrote on Nov 23, 2008 6:35 PM:
Those classes are a year early of the players you listed... But anyways; the 03 list you listed from Vintage actually graduated in 2004 includes (JC and/or d1a/d1aa/d2 football)
Brock Daniels, Ian Hetrick, James Hartley, Kyle Aber, John Cortese, Adam Pereria, Andrew Downing, Kyle Fulford (4 still playing, 2 not playing, 2 playing next season)
Couple others from the class of 2006 Vintage-
Jared Pereria, Kyle Mathieu, Travis Hayes.. (all still playing)
Those are the only ones I could think of now but there are definitely more.
You're only limited to what you ALLOW people to think of you. Screw all the "norms" that kids from Napa can't play college ball. If you want something bad enough go get it. "
spdnpwr5 wrote on Nov 23, 2008 6:38 PM:
(not playing anymore but...)
Vintage Class of 03-
Grant Avayzan (UC Davis) "