NVR Logo
Copia: A reflection of Napa?
Wednesday, December 03, 2008
Save and Share Share
Copia is a critical business in downtown Napa, not necessarily because of what it is but rather where it is, in the heart of the most recent attempts to revitalize downtown Napa.

Copia was the anchor for the emerging Oxbow district, all within a walk of Main Street and other downtown business establishments. As something that would draw mainly tourists and give them something to do besides eat and drink, it could have been a major draw to bring people downtown. Right now it doesn’t appear that will ever happen, at least with the current ownership, and it is time to sell it all outright and let someone else give it a try.
The history of its ups and mostly downs is well known by Napans now, and there is no use going over that much more or placing blame. But one salient fact that has to be addressed is there was never any unifying vision about exactly what this was. The first time I went there and had no history of its background, I was struck by the feeling that there was nothing there. "What do you do here?", I asked my niece who was here when it was built. Maybe I missed something upstairs somewhere?

When you have any kind of successful enterprise, there is invariably a single individual with a vision that is behind the success of that enterprise. Behind Ford Motors was the visionary genius of Henry Ford, behind Microsoft was Bill Gates, even in most rock bands you find out that there is one main person who is the "talent" and the rest of the band are filling in roles.
Copia never had that. And it shows. It looks like a team project of people who were hired to think something up, quick, and they all headed in different directions. Holding on to the same management structure now is not going to work. It is not a matter of how hard or smart the hired help is, it is a matter of a fundamentally flawed structure.

Ironically, that is pretty much how Napa operates all too often. My wife and I went to downtown Sonoma last weekend and were struck by how nice, well planned, and thriving it was. Healdsburg has a wonderful downtown that is vibrant as well. How did that happen? It was because all the major players in town shared a vision of how they wanted their downtown to look, and once that happened they were able to bring it about.
When you look back to the history of the inability of Napa to get a thriving downtown, a history that has been marred by constant struggles and setbacks, the usual answers are, well there was a recession, the stock market bubble, the terrorist attacks, etc. All these factors had some impact, but that all affected Sonoma and Healdsburg too, yet there they are.

The real problem in Napa is that the community itself is divided, and can’t make up its mind what it wants. There are the "Amber Martin (who got a surprising 26% of the vote in the last city council election)" Napkins who are determined to hold Napa at 1958. There are the progressive business people who want hotels and tourist attractions, the Farm Bureau whose main concern is protecting property for agriculture, the wine industry which mainly focuses on high end tourists, and others.

It isn’t so much that people don’t like each other. In fact, people get along here really well compared to most places. And there is really nothing wrong with any of their particular interests. It is just that we have competing visions about what we want, and it is a back and forth struggle that never seems to end.

Copia needs to be bought out by a single individual or corporation with a real vision of what it could be and change it into something that is not only profitable but makes a real contribution to the downtown area. This is going to have to be driven by a private owner with a vision of what it could be and the drive to make it happen. An appointed board using other people’s money that are disinterested parties is not going to work. It rarely does. Businesses that hire management with absentee owners who are not involved in the day-to-day operation is a prescription for failure.

Napa needs to work out a way for its disparate interests to reach some kind of common ground on a vision for downtown. The biggest divide can be expressed in shorthand as local vs. wine industry, and a logical starting point would be to make downtown something that locals can enjoy and meets their needs, and let the upper valley focus mainly on high end tourism. It doesn’t have to be mutually exclusive, but a matter of emphasis.

Downtown Sonoma has a very busy Mary’s Pizza Shack on the same block as some fine dining restaurants. We can have the Ritz Carlton, but lets make Copia more oriented toward something locals as well as tourists can enjoy. And beyond that, Napa is at a place where the entire county needs to come together to make an overall plan that can meet the needs of all the various players while at the same time respecting the need for a unifying vision.

Michael Haley writes a weekly Napablogger and a regular Daily Napablogger column for NapaValleyRegister.com. Haley is president of the Napa Valley Taxpayers Alliance. He can be reached at napaeagle@hughes.net
25 comment(s)

Jane Eyrehead wrote on Dec 3, 2008 4:59 PM:

" Good commentary.

I loved Copia's gardens and I appreciated the concerts and the Friday Night Flicks. Obviously, I wasn't enough to keep Copia in the black, but its presence encouraged other businesses to locate in the area.

The observations about the community are on point. Some people dream of exclusive boutiques downtown, while others yet bewail the closing of Woolworth's. "Divided" does not begin to describe the situation. "

Bill wrote on Dec 3, 2008 5:04 PM:

" Sell it to Keith Rogal and make it into a housing wonder land. "

Bill wrote on Dec 3, 2008 5:05 PM:

" That vision thing again. Don't you find it rather Bush? "

a teacher wrote on Dec 3, 2008 5:12 PM:

" I've never been to Copia. It offered nothing I was interested in. It was built to appeal to high end tourists. I am neither high end nor a tourist.

I used to go downtown. I liked to buy books at Bookends or Copperfields (both gone). Drink coffee at St. Helena Coffee, but now there are a million Starbucks and Peet's is near Copperfields. I liked to shop at Mervyn's. Gone. I liked to shop at the Salvation Army Store. Gone. Go to the movies. Going. I used to launch my Kayak off the boat launch. Gone. I've got no reason to go downtown except for the occasional restaurant, which isn't often.

What is the busiest place in Napa on a weekend? Bell Aire Plaza. Why? Whole Foods, Trader Joes, Target, Copperfields, Peet's Coffee, etc.

I always think of Petaluma in comparison to Napa. They are roughly the same size, same age. Both river towns. They are both stop overs (people are going to Santa Rosa and St. Helena or Calistoga). Petaluma has a vibrant downtown. It's always busy on the weekends. Is it full of tourists? Nope, locals.

If Napa wants a vibrant downtown, it needs to give LOCALs a reason to go there. "

Rich wrote on Dec 4, 2008 7:16 AM:

" Well said Michael,
I am 4th generation napa valley and now a bit over 50 years old. When I was a child living in St Helena the valley was packed full of things a family could do for fun without leaving the area.
Today if I want to go have fun with the grandkids I end up in Fairfield or even Winters.
My three boys, the fifth generation, have all left the valley bound for resident friendly towns and when I retire in a few years my wife and I will be right behind them.
We have turned this valley over to an unholy mix of inept politicians, money grubbing vintners and environmentalists who now control our every move.
Copia was never for us and its failure causes me no grief "

overthehill wrote on Dec 4, 2008 10:55 AM:

" Mike, you are right on the mark about vision. The original redevelopment was supposed to be east of Mervyn's towards Pearl Street. A new Council changed the vision and created the big ditch instead. They then allowed a savings and loan on 1st street, another vision change. Then the County moved to 1st street, another vision change. The City had spent millions providing property for the downtown mall, and fought the vision of the first developer. After their failure, they allowed the property to be sold for far less than half of the costs of the City alone. Over a million spent for alley access behind Merrill's alone.
Now they are discussing two way streets which would require millions in sidewalk and light changes.
Lack of vision, probably not, making decisions only on the transient occupancy tax possibilities alone, you bet! "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Dec 4, 2008 3:43 PM:

" a teacher - I live in Brown's Valley and the reason that Downtown Napa is once again becoming a bunch of empty storefronts is...

The downtown merchants association.

Which is largely to blame for their own situation.

The Napa Valley Chef's market saga proved it.

They took away every incentive for local people to come downtown and so few came down.

They wanted to say what kind of food could be sold (Remember Willie Bird), did away with Molly's Angels wine glasses, cut the music and ended up having nothing worth coming to see on a day we couldn't come.

I find it hard to weep for the Napa downtown now.

~Ruff "

a teacher wrote on Dec 4, 2008 5:16 PM:

" Ruff, I'm with you there. I used to like the chef's market, but the last two years it has been LAME. Who do these people think are going to go to the chef's market?

If you are a kid or a single adult there is nothing to do in Napa. If you have something to do other than eat, there is little reason to go downtown.

What a waste. "

NVGal wrote on Dec 4, 2008 8:41 PM:

" Copia never represented Napa at all, in the beginning Copia was the one that rejected Napa and locals for this idea of an elite tourist that really never existed. At least not in bulk quantities. The argument that locals and the wine industry are divided doesn’t fly. I know long time Napkins who have struck up friendships with tourists and have become great friends. Most of us know winemakers, vineyard owners, or work for wineries ourselves. The wine industry is such an ingrained part of most of our lives now. We as locals know more about wine than those “elite tourists” do. We are the ones that have access to the best food, the best wine and the best wine knowledge on a regular basis. Longtime Napkins handle change just fine, we embrace stores and restaurants that respect us and the history that is Napa, that is the only difference to a business’s success or failure. Ever other part of Napa has changed, and we have handled it fine, so saying that Napa is divided and that we don’t know what we want is another sorry excuse for a lack of vision and leadership within our city council.

The Oxbow district will thrive if they understand this local culture and respect it. Taylor’s is a perfect example of how to thrive in a local environment while serving tourists at the same time. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 4, 2008 9:35 PM:

" Jane, Rich, overthehill and teacher, thanks for your comments. Ruff good point about the Downtown Merchants Association too. Picolini's is never going to be a Martinin house, yet the downtown Merchants are trying to attract the same customers. Ain't going to happen. So what are they doing?

That is what is behind the convention and visitors bureau splitting off, the kind of tourist that they wanted to attract is not going to be going over a bunch of travel brochures in a office full of people downtown. They are going to be on their private planes to the airport and limo'd up to the upper valley without looking out the window.

And that is fine, the whole place could work for everyone but I am starting to think that the problem is that the City wants to grab some of that tourist money with the high end hotels. I really wonder if that is part of the problem breaking down the Napa Pipe deal, they know there are only going to be so many high end hotel rooms, we may be getting to the point of too many already, and Rogal plans to build a luxury hotel at Napa Pipe.

My wife had a great idea for Copia, look out for her letter to the editor. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 4, 2008 9:41 PM:

" overthehill, you mentioned the TOT. I am coming to think that is a lot of what is going on right now. The city wants the money, they wouldn't need it if they reigned in spending more. I have harped on that because I think they are paying the employees way too much, but most of the residents do not. It is a Democratic party issue, and they feel that unionized employees should be given what they want.

Due to the big costs of that, the city is constantly driven to generate new revenues and they see those tourist dollars as the answer. That is part of the problem with Napa Pipe as well.

There is no long term vision and what happens is that we lurch from city council to city council all with different agendas. The visioin has to come from the community, and the community has not gathered its forces for a general interest group to bring us together. I think that could happen and I feel like I am understanding it better and better all the time. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 4, 2008 9:51 PM:

" NVGal I am with you on the non existent tourists Copia wanted to attract. They all went Up Valley, the really high end tourists are not going to go downtown that much.

But you lost me on blaming it all on the city council's. They are only five people out of the 75,000 that live in Napa. If five people show up at a city council meeting and demand something the council has voted against they immediately flip around and do it. They do whatever the people want them to do.

The people are running this town and it is their responsibility to know what they want. Just sitting back and blaming the city council is what some people do a lot, I get their emails, but where are their ideas of what positive things to do? Why aren't they running for office or speaking out or joining groups to lobby for things?

That is why I ask people pointed questions here, like if you don't like Napa Pipe, where do you want the housing? That is a serious question and I got all joke answers. No one had a real answer, except Bill. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 4, 2008 9:54 PM:

" Bill, I don't think Bush I had much vision despite his comment, which was really a put down if you think about it.

Lack of vision is a crisis in the world right now, people dont have answers and really don't know what to do about mounting problems.

It is my second key point of crisis after a lack of character. Maybe one day I will write about it.

You can sum up the problems of downtown Napa in that phrase, lack of vision. "

St.Hell.comNative wrote on Dec 6, 2008 12:04 PM:

" To comment on the article itself, Healdsburg and Sonoma were mentioned because of their thriving downtown areas. The reason for this is the way it is set up... Town squares! Both have a wonderful park in the middle and there are some awesome shops! Napa should take some lessons from either town. I have played tourist many times in Sonoma and I must admit I have done so in Calistoga and hometown of St. Helena! Both upvalley towns do have things to offer to locals and I have spent money on items that were too good to pass up. Good luck downtown Napa! "

glenroy wrote on Dec 8, 2008 8:28 AM:

" Well said…I think NB pretty much sums the situation up as good as can it be for a sad situation……my initial thoughts were, and remain when Copia went up was how can anybody relate that ugly, sterile looking thing to a world class valley, wine… buttermilk biscuits? No Woebegone…but there are similarities with downtown…

The demise of Downtown Napa can be traced to the mid to late 1960s when out of town ‘redevelopment consultants’ refused to listen to the merchants… after all…they were the ’experts,‘ what could a bunch of country bumpkins know? The ‘die was cast’ after the City Administration more or less when along… The vision was wall to wall cafes, restaurants, art galleries, instead of the current successful generational businesses like….Shallow Shoes, Napa City Bakery, IXL and Allen and Benedict… Some of them survived for a while but when the upper valley residents started going over the hill to shop ….DT Napa was DOS….

By the way….regardless of who takes credit today, and there are many…‘The Opera House’ was saved by ‘downtown merchants and generational Napans‘…..

Personally, I don’t think downtown and Copia can compete with upper valley tourist trade any time soon or survive without local shoppers until then….they have neither now, but had both before the ‘visionaries’ fixed it. "

Paddy wrote on Dec 8, 2008 9:58 AM:

" Nobody is determined to keep Napa in 1958. That's a ridiculous statement. We are sick and massive development in American Canyon and development throughout Napa that have created havoc on the roads and now contribute to elevated stress levels, smog and general irritation exemplified by the reason comments on bike riding in Napa.

1998 was a great year in a community of half the traffic signals (and traffic), school classes everyone could be proud of, a community that actually felt like a community and incomparable vistas from one end of the valley to another.

The 'napkins' that desire more of what we had instead of more of what is being shoved down our throats are probably also "the Farm Bureau whose main concern is protecting property for agriculture, the wine industry which mainly focuses on high end tourists". We are the ones that want Napa Valley to continue to be a clean, safe and wonderful escape from those communities that have been over-built, over-populated and over-exploited.

So Michael, in the minds of those who want to tear down and/or build on every square foot of space in Napa it may seem like we're in constant conflict. To those of us who want Napa to be the wonderful community that we've known and loved for generations, there is no conflict. We're very clear on what we don't want. "

Paddy wrote on Dec 8, 2008 10:29 AM:

" Having just reread this, I apologize for the grammatical errors in this comment. I really need to use a word processor prior to posting. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 8, 2008 1:12 PM:

" Paddy, don't worry about the grammatical errors, this is quick off the top of the head writing, or is supposed to be.

Your last sentence is ironic, there is no conflict, but we don't want what other people want. Ok. Do you see the problem there? That is a conflict and that is just the point.

I don't think the Farm Bureau or wine industry exactly wants what the Napkins want, I think the environmentalists are closer. The Farm Bureau and wine industry want housing for their workers, the environmentalists want urban centered housing and quite often want policies that shut down farming.

Note also that Get a Grip on Growth did not oppose the big expansion of annexable land in American Canyon, nor do they oppose developing Foster Road.

So there are a lot of conflicts. I was being a bit tongue in cheek when I said 1958, should I have said 1998?

The point is that napkins are clinging to a past that is gone and will never return. It would be a better strategy for napkins to get what they want by developing a plan that meets some of the needs of the larger community while also meeting theirs.

I feel that my thoughts about Copia and downtown are actually a way to approach that. "

Bill wrote on Dec 8, 2008 2:46 PM:

" Perhaps the vision thing has locked on to a single object to the exclusion of all others, wine and tourism. Only one major clothing chain now serves a city of 75,000 and the surrounding area. The choice for most is McCalous or Walmart. No major appliance chain. Possibly it is the changing times and these and other retail businesses are not viable in such a locale.

Is there any real reason to spend our money downtown? You cannot buy a toothbrush between Soscol and Jefferson or Lincoln and Imola, or almost. Only along those boundaries can one find any thing truly relevant to daily needs. Now that Vallergas is gone the eastern boundary should be where?

A bookstore? A pharmacy? A camera shop or any small service oriented shop? A newsstand? I realize that these things have become obsolete (like reading from a hard copy) but there must be some viable business to populate the existing retail space available in downtown. A great locally owned toy store still exists because some daring people think out side the box but I understand it is for sale or sold, I hope it stays the same or nearly so.

If the box we are pulling ideas from only vision is entertainment and not retail service that the big box stores and the Internet have eaten up then there is no vision. Turn Copia into a real farmers market like at downtown Davis. Get rid of the overpriced up scale oxbow and have the Valley wineries and growers really show case their stuff there where it does the whole county some good. The one good idea that Bob Mondavi had was to sell wine that one could eat with a burger not a burger one could eat with wine. "

Bill wrote on Dec 8, 2008 2:58 PM:

" There greatest problem with Copia is it did not reflect Napa. It was never anywhere near a vision with a feasible base or local support.

Downtown to be viable must reestablish itself as a commercial center for the service of the city's residents and secondly the alluded to larger concerns. Only if local people support with their spending will there be a Downtown. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Dec 9, 2008 12:41 PM:

" I'm going to say that Copia got here too early.

The city moms and pops should have had more shovels turning dirt sooner. Lots of cities have a 'culture district' where the well-off can hobnob with each other and buy expensive wine and knick-knacks.

However, having Copia sitting there alone in a sea of old buildings for several years was a mistake.

Now the hotels are coming in and Copia is gone.

I still think that making the Copia campus part of the Napa Valley College instead of letting it sit empty while a buyer is searched for in a down economy is a good idea.

~Ruff "

NVGal wrote on Dec 10, 2008 8:46 PM:

" NB – you can call me out on my comments towards the city council, that’s fine. What I am disappointed in is the lack of vision and lack of execution with regards to downtown Napa. My disappointment does not motivate me to run for council! Jeez! :-)

Napa is probably influenced more by the areas around it rather than the people who live in it. That’s why there cannot be a conflict from those who live here now, and who will stay in the future. It’s also too big to support only one type of community and too small to have mini communities within it. Within that you have the areas that have been filled in. This idea that local Napkins have rejected anything that has to do with tourism, and that we have run any business out of town that caters only to tourists is false. Likewise is this idea that the tourist have run over the ruralness of Napa. I guess what I am trying to say is that there really isn’t a conflict between locals, there is just a misunderstanding of what is happening.

Napa Pipe is not close enough at this time to be organically influence by Napa. It poses a huge risk of becoming basically a shanty town. Better places to build are along south Combs where the old tannery is and in the downtown area itself. "

Bill wrote on Dec 11, 2008 2:05 PM:

" NVGAL, excellent suggestion. If there were a former industrial property that lent it self to housing the old tannery would be an excellent choice!!! and there are many others with in the current city limits. "

napadad wrote on Dec 12, 2008 10:37 AM:

" I think Copia was meant to fail from the beginning, the uproar over the proposed building of hotels and convention center required some out of the box thinking so we got copia doomed to failure from the start. That opened the way for the massive hotel building spree and now that copia has failed it will get developed the way it was originally intended as a hotel and boutique mall area maybe with a small convention center in the already existing buildings. What noone seems to want to take a hard look at is the river. an ox bow is a temporary thing and the oxbow in napa in no different. The land copia sits on is reclaimed built on the old dump site (100 yrs old) and the winter floods take sections of the bank out every year. The river walk path behind copia washed out the first year and has never been repaired the plastic irrigation pipe is strewn along the river from there to green island road. If left unchecked the rear loading area will wash out in a couple of more years and the building will be unsafe. Our city planners at work. Ask anyone who used to walk that area or fish that area how much land has disappeared in the last decade. Poor palnning at its worst. "

Newview wrote on Dec 14, 2008 1:07 PM:

" MI A COPIA! I believe that the question that I should ask is? Napa City is going through growing pains? How long will the pain last? I really believe that to much spotlight is put upon the "NAPASTAR PERSONALITIES"! Okay, you came to Napa and you became successful. DONE! Congrads to you and all successful new money people. All we hear and read about is: who's got money, who is building what, how much does it cost, how much money do they have, they own all of downtown, what is there dream for downtown, who is in charge, they can get it down when no one else can, the chef's market, the downtown merchants, the chef's market, the downtown merchants, it is a chant now the chef's market, the downtown merchants!

We are sorry for interrupting the pre-obsessed chant the chef's market, the downtown merchants! However we would like to inform you that if you do not take an active role in your community government those to which you are at opposition with will succeed in negociating there vision and idea's for downtown Napa. Did you know that there is way to submit your vision? It is called Community comment at the City Council. Dont nay say! Suit up and show up with a intelligent response to you thoughts, desires and needs.

This has been a public service announcement brought to you by Newview Napa's newest and viewist little guy with something to say.

COPIA is good for the community, and will be good for the community. STOP THE WRECKING BALL! "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy