NVR Logo
County redraws 'bubble' maps
Supervisors protect more ag land at a dozen sites
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Save and Share Share
Pop.

A majority of the Napa County Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to reconfigure the county’s 12 so-called urban bubbles, adding about 1,800 acres to the county’s trove of clearly-labeled agricultural land.
The majority also voted to redraw county maps of city boundaries to better reflect what is county land and what is city land.

In one of several related votes Tuesday, supervisors Diane Dillon, Mark Luce and Brad Wagenknecht formed a majority to make the elimination of agricultural land in Angwin’s urban bubble a first step in a process to take a closer look at land use designations in Angwin.
Translation: The controversy surrounding Pacific Union College’s proposed eco-village development will be continued to Jan. 27, when critics of the project will again lobby the board to accept their zoning plan for Angwin, which would whittle the college’s 380-unit eco-village proposal down to 191 units.

Critics of PUC’s development proposal turned out to voice the same concerns they have over the last year: more homes in Angwin would equal more lives endangered by fire and narrow, rural roads choked with more traffic.
PUC and developed Triad Communities are working on environmental studies to examine impacts from the project, but have said the eco-village — with sustainable homes, additional retail in Angwin and improvements to the PUC campus — will prove a benefit to the community.

PUC representatives were notably silent during Tuesday’s meeting. In the past, PUC has said that any changes to the Angwin urban bubble represent a violation of the college’s private property rights and might damage the college’s ability to operate in the future.

Some supervisors were careful to point out Tuesday they felt they were being fair to the college after being threatened with legal action by Alan Reinach, a lawyer and president of the Seventh-day Adventist Church State Council.

Reinach sent the county a letter in February warning that changes to the Angwin urban bubble could be interpreted as a form of religious discrimination under federal law. PUC is an Adventist institution.

“I think we are being fair because we’re treating Angwin with the same process,” Luce said. “But I think it deserves more attention.”

Dillon agreed.

“Something needs to be done,” she said. “I don’t know what it is. We have excellent creative planners, maybe they could give us a suggestion.”

“It shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone in Angwin that there is a subsequent step,” Wagenknecht said.

Supervisors Harold Moskowite and Bill Dodd said they could not support the Angwin decision. Dodd said he had no problem taking a closer look at Angwin, but he didn’t support the day’s “process.”

Moskowite wanted to deal with the Angwin issue in its entirety Tuesday.

Decisions about urban bubbles — swaths of land in agricultural areas where the county would allow urban growth — in Deer Park and Moskowite Corners took place with supervisors Luce and  Moskowite excused for possible conflicts of interest, respectively.

Luce’s wife works at St. Helena Hospital and Moskowite owns significant tracts of land in Moskowite Corners.
13 comment(s)

Econut wrote on Dec 10, 2008 8:20 AM:

" Trees not vines! "

BD4 wrote on Dec 10, 2008 8:56 AM:

" So, where are the other sites NVR and what was the outcome of those? "

Rob C wrote on Dec 10, 2008 10:41 AM:

" So in order to provide legal "cover" for the social engineering they wish to apply to the PUC issue, the county will engage in property taking across the county, just to, you know, make it all even-steven...

Yes, much more expedient than tackling the PUC proposal head-on. Plus they now get to sprinkle a little govt-intervention fairy dust on other land owners at the same time.

Woot! "

HMcritic wrote on Dec 10, 2008 12:38 PM:

" I’m wondering at what point does the County Attorney start investigating Bill Dodd? Where were his concerns about the process when the developers hauled bus loads of students down and handed them bogus protest signs to try to sway the process? What was his stand on Triad’s co-opting the Adventists Religious Liberty effort to threaten suit for a bogus claim under the RLUIPA to try to sidetrack the process? Is he concerned about protecting the process or the outcome? "

kkjp wrote on Dec 10, 2008 2:16 PM:

" HMcritic -- Why stop there? Why not ask the County Attorney to "investigate" all the supervisors whenever their opinions differ from ours? What do they think, they have a right to free speech? "

HMcritic wrote on Dec 10, 2008 4:55 PM:

" Kkjp: Shouldn't we should question any public servant - not when their views are inconsistent with you or me - but when they are inconsistent with themselves showing a bias in favor of a special interest? "

kkjp wrote on Dec 10, 2008 9:37 PM:

" Public servants express bias for or against various issues every day. Calling for the County Attorney to investigate" them when they do so sounds very Big Brotherish. Would you prefer they sit mute in public meetings rather than share their thoughts and opinions with their constituents so we can understand their views and their decision making process?

If you're not focusing on Dodd because you don't agree with his stated opinion, why aren't you calling for an investigation of a couple of the other supervisors who certainly demonstrated a bias, as well? Because you support and share their opinions, that's why. "

Econut wrote on Dec 11, 2008 7:45 AM:

" Why do we need to have more agricultural land? According to Emily Heaton, doctoral student in the UC Berkeley Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, vineyards in Napa County expanded from 32,715 acres in 1990 to 45,136 acres in 2006. Do we really need more? Agriculture is NOT very green. Vitners basically attempt to eradicate all but ONE species from their land. And it's not a staple food item. "

PUC Prof wrote on Dec 11, 2008 8:51 AM:

" Did Bill Dodd commit a crime? What about the Steering Commission members who, one after another, expressed their view that PUC was being treated unfairly? What about the students who, one after another, expressed support for their college? I think county attorneys can spend our tax money more wisely by investigating real crimes. "

PUC Prof wrote on Dec 11, 2008 1:27 PM:

" I think we humans are all biased by "special interests" to some degree and county supervisors are no exception. As long as they and their families or friends do not benefit financially from special interest groups, I see no harm. I could easily accuse Diane Dillon, who represents Angwin, of philandering to special interest groups (SRA, wine growers), but I know she and the other supes spend many tedious hours studying thorny issues of vital interest to the residents of Napa County and don't get paid much for their services. I don't envy their job. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, I trust that their decisions are based on what they personally believe is right and fair and in the best interests of the county. I appreciate their service even if I don't always agree with their decisions. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Dec 11, 2008 6:13 PM:

" Econut, I agree that grapes are not a staple food item but if we face a future of high priced transportation and low availability of food, we will be delighted that we preserved these agricultural lands which can be transformed into staple foods if the going gets tough.

Keep in mind that just because gas prices have decreased food transportation costs, it's temporary. Preserving our ag lands is one of the smartest things we can do. Once land is chopped up and developed into tiny parcels, the flexibility of the land is gone forever. "

HMcritic wrote on Dec 11, 2008 9:53 PM:

" Prof: I agree with you. I would like to bring this to a close. Dodd is a hardworking public servant who has served this County for a long time. He must have seen something in the process that others did not. My statements were intemperate.

And the County Attorney certainly has better things to do. Like deal with PUC's next threat to sue on a religious liberty claim. "

PUC Prof wrote on Dec 12, 2008 9:53 AM:

" Fair enough, and I hope there will be no lawsuits filed by anybody. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy