NVR Logo
Remake at the lake
Carol Krauthamer and her son pass empty vacation homes left by owners who saw the end of an era coming. New concession contracts are due to be signed in 2009, seeming to promise to breathe new life into the lake next summer. Register file photo | Buy photos
Thursday, January 01, 2009
Save and Share Share
The old Lake Berryessa shoreline has been gone for awhile, but the new one hasn’t arrived.

With any luck, 2009 will see a new dawn for the popular recreation spot in eastern Napa County — and even some good news for residents of the remote area.
In 2008, most of the seven privately-run resorts on the Berryessa shoreline were shuttered at the end of decades-long contracts.

The Bureau of Reclamation, which oversees the shoreline, ordered the removal of about 1,400 trailers from the shoreline. This is expected to make way for better access to the lake and more modern facilities, from hotels and restaurants to cabins and campsites.
The Pensus Group, an Arizona-based developer of lakeside marinas and resorts, won the contract to be the new concessionaire for five of the seven Berryessa resorts, including Rancho Monticello, Spanish Flat, Lake Berryessa Marina, Putah Creek and Steele Park.

At first, bureau officials were hopeful that the deal with Pensus could be signed by the summer. But June and July passed with no deals. Some of the resorts that stayed open at the lake had busy years, but, overall, the number of visitors was down and many local businesses suffered. 2008 was something of a lost year at the lake.
Bureau officials have not stated what is delaying the negotiations, only indicating they are complex. However, the bureau and former concessionaires have disagreed about the value of old equipment and infrastructure and who is responsible for addressing it, and some of these matters may have spilled into the Pensus talks.

In December, bureau officials announced a new 30-year deal with one of the other resorts, Pleasure Cove. A bureau spokeswoman said the deal is a good harbinger for the Pensus deal, which she said would be signed within 60 days.

If so, the new concessionaires will have ample time to gear up for the summer season at the lake.

Meanwhile, Pensus’ presence could start the ball rolling on upgrades to the water supply for locals at Berryessa Highlands, the residential area near Steele Park and Moskowite Corners.

The Napa Berryessa Resort Improvement District, which includes property owners in the area, voted in 2007 to pay nearly $14 million for improvements to the drinking water supply and sewage treatment in the area.

The operator of Steele Park Resort would be on the hook for about $4 million of that total. But with the Pensus deal incomplete, NBRID officials have not issued the bonds that would start the improvements.

The NBRID has until 2012 to meet standards enforced by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. Until it does, a moratorium bars construction of any new residences in Berryessa Highlands.
7 comment(s)

my2cents wrote on Jan 1, 2009 10:52 AM:

" was up at the lake the other day, and if we don't get some water in there soon, they can build all the concessions they want, but the stagnant, fly filled area will be empty. The close island by Oak Shores has about a foot of water to wade thru to get to. there are 2 new islands between it and the further out island. The area that was cordoned off for swimmers is above ground. It is bad in my opinion. Monticello may start popping up before too long. But hey, Bush says there is no global warming, so I must be wrong, and there is no problem at all. Have fun in the slimy green over crowded pond this summer.
I for one hope for lots of rain, but don't see it coming. Tsk, Tsk, Tsk. "

flacoman wrote on Jan 1, 2009 1:37 PM:

" Bill,
Does your wife still have a connection to the Sierra Club? If so, all of your coments and opinions are tainted. The morons at the BOR should have at least have had consession contracts in place before the resorts were closed. There were a great many people deprived of facilities at the lake this past summer because of this.
As of now there are still no contracts signed and in the current fiscal climate, there is no guarantee that there ever will be.
What if the Pensus Group goes belly up before the work is done? Is there a back-up plan? I think there are many people, such as the editor of the NVR, who would love to see the lake just close up shop. "

GregN. wrote on Jan 1, 2009 5:40 PM:

" BILL KISLIUK,

Thank you for keeping us readers updated on what's going on up there.

It figured that Pensus would want someone else to foot the bill for other improvements.

I hope something starts going by this summer. "

old_napan wrote on Jan 1, 2009 7:39 PM:

" Whether you believe in global warming or not, you can't use the current level of the lake to determine anything other than it's been at this level several times in the past. The mid 70's drought had the old bridge out of water and people were still using the lake. I'm concerned that the concessionaire contract was awarded to only one vendor. This won't leave much flexibility in how the different resorts will be managed. In other words, no competition, no reason to a provide a value based and efficient recreational product to the users. Makes me wish Monticello was still there. "

justnana wrote on Jan 1, 2009 11:08 PM:

" Does this mean that there will be clean, well run, campsites for my family this summer? The last camping experience was frightening with too much alcohol and machismo amonst the campers. The campsites were pretty run down also. It would be nice to see it moved up a notch! "

JimClark wrote on Jan 2, 2009 12:29 PM:

" One less place for crime, littering, unsightly dwellings but if one does visit our Lake, please pick-up your necessaries at thtSpanish Flat General Store. This is not an advertisement. Where I live, it beats driving to Napa or St. Helena. "

leavintown wrote on Jan 3, 2009 4:52 AM:

" I like the way the lake is right now. No one is going up there. So that means I get to fish in peace. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy