NVR Logo
St. Helena imposes new water limits
Residents can only water gardens, lawns on specific dates
Monday, January 19, 2009
Save and Share Share
The St. Helena City Council agreed 3-2 last week to impose mandatory water restrictions on residents in response to paltry precipitation and a bleak forecast for the rest of the rainy season.

A majority of the council voted to establish a Phase II emergency, even though the council’s agenda only mentioned a discussion of Phase I regulations, which are purely voluntary.
Councilmembers Bonnie Schoch and Sharon Crull disagreed. They said that before the council goes to Phase II, the public should be notified that mandatory measures are being considered.

Phase II requires that customers with even-numbered addresses only water their lawns, plants and vineyards on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Odd-numbered addresses may water only on Wednesday, Friday and Sunday. Watering and irrigation are prohibited on Mondays.
So-called “wasteful usage” of water, including the use of water from hydrants for construction purposes or fire drills, is also prohibited under Phase II.

As of last week, Bell Canyon reservoir, the city’s primary water source, was at 40.6 percent of full capacity. At this time last year the reservoir was 61.6 percent full.
According to the city’s municipal codes, Phase I goes into effect if the level is below 45 percent on Dec. 1. Technically the city was in Phase I throughout 2008, and Tuesday’s agenda item was intended to reiterate the need to conserve.

Those codes call for Phase II to be instituted if Bell Canyon is less than 25 percent on Nov. 1, below 35 percent on Dec. 1, or below 75 percent on June 1. The code also allows Phase II to be established if Phase III conditions — triggered by Bell Canyon falling below 25 percent at any time — appear imminent.

A majority of the council invoked that second provision to declare a Phase II emergency.

Phase I includes voluntary measures that “encourage” customers to reduce their monthly water use by at least 10 percent and “encourage” them to only wash their cars with a quick rinse from a water-efficient hose.

For the full description of Phase I, Phase II and Phase III regulations, go to www.sthelenacity.com, click “Municipal Code,” and read Section 13.04.230-250.
5 comment(s)

pernodboi wrote on Jan 19, 2009 7:43 AM:

" OK - I like to stay optimistic about most things, but this is ridiculous. The folks that do care about conservation will be doing all the work and changing their life while the water wasters still will waste water.

Why no just look at their bills? Folks that use more than their quato get charged a lot more, and those that do not, get a break. If the excessive water usage continues, have a talk with them and explain their water will be turned off unless they mend their evil ways.

(I do find myself available if you need a position filled. Water Police? Code Enforcement? Water King, oh yeah!)

I imagine it is the extreemely wealthy that are the main problem here (I won't name names) and if they wanted their gardens well maintained they could install cisterns and have water shipped in. In other parts of the country this is a part of everyday life. "

bob2 wrote on Jan 19, 2009 8:25 AM:

" Most people's water usage is for plant irrigation.Why not give each residence a base usage allowance and restict the amount above that? "

mtveederview wrote on Jan 21, 2009 10:48 AM:

" Notification, Inclusion and Consultation of the Saint Helena residents always appears to be a problem with the City Council. It is an interesting legacy and seems to continue as a deficiency in the council and mayoral positions. Councilmembers Bonnie Schoch and Sharon Crull are right to require the participation of the residents, for enforcement will rely upon them to be successful and save an equal share of water for all residents. "

mtveederview wrote on Jan 21, 2009 10:52 AM:

" Dear JESSE DUARTE: How about doing a story on the St Helena City Council's history of Notification, Inclusion and Consultation of the Saint Helena residents? It is an interesting legacy and seems to continue as a deficiency in the council and mayoral positions. "

yah-think wrote on Jan 21, 2009 1:13 PM:

" How about trying the Director of Finance as well. You might find the issues lie there as well. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy