NVR Logo
Angwin eco-village's future debated by supervisors today
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Save and Share Share
10 a.m.At a much-anticipated public hearing this afternoon, the Napa County Board of Supervisors will attempt to align conflicting land-use maps — either giving Pacific Union College and Triad Communities the green light to continue with their plans for the controversial Angwin eco-village, or setting in motion a process to stop the development before it even reaches the board.

PUC and Triad announced plans in 2007 to build a 591-home eco-village — with environmentally-sustainable residences, new retail space and improvements to the PUC campus. The proposal has since been downsized to 380 homes amid opposition from a vocal group of Angwin residents worried about the impacts of the development on their rural community.
Last year, the Napa County Planning Commission proposed a re-zoning and a reduction in size of about a dozen “urban bubbles” in order to make county maps consistent. The roughly-drawn bubbles identified rural areas in Angwin, Pope Valley, Moskowite Corners and elsewhere that could someday be used for urban development, but they failed in many cases to take into account the contours of the land or existing uses.

Supervisors in December adopted most, but not all, of these recommended changes, voting to preserve about 1,800 acres of agricultural land in these areas. When it came to the Angwin urban bubble, however, outside of removing ag land, a majority of supervisors voted to continue discussions to this afternoon during their meeting slated to being at 1:30 p.m..
If supervisors adopt the Planning Commission’s proposal for Angwin zoning changes, it would have no effect on the proposed eco-village. But if the county approves an alternate proposal from Save Rural Angwin — a group opposed to the eco-village — the decision would limit the development to 191 residential units, a project size allowed under existing law but inconsistent with PUC’s goals.

If the board seeks zoning changes other than those recommended by the Planning Commission, the issue would return to the Planning Commission for further discussion. The Planning Commission would have a minimum of 45 days to respond to the Board of Supervisors’ changes, though supervisors could give them up to six months or even a year, Gitelman said.
Check back late this afternoon for an update from the county supervisors meeting.
3 comment(s)

vocal-de-local wrote on Jan 27, 2009 6:47 PM:

" I was very impressed by Dillon today. No doubt she put a great amount of research and effort into this matter. And thank you to Caldwell as well,. Both of you were pillars of strength in the face of a difficult task.

I think we have at least two supervisors on board who recognize the dangers of allowing growth to go unchecked in this county. Dillon's perspective on preserving our agricultural lands for the future and the value they may hold in local food availability when methods of transportation becomes prohibitively expensive was absolutely right on! She and Caldwell have the interests of future generations in mind. They are effective leaders. "

napablogger wrote on Jan 27, 2009 10:14 PM:

" Unchecked growth by building 280 units plus a retiree home, the only place allowable to build north of Oak Knoll?

St Helena isn't going to build any more houses to speak of, nor is Yountville. This effectively shuts down all house building except for big Mansions on huge parcels except for the City of Napa or American Canyon.

Dillon and Caldwell both claim that they are not stopping the ecovillage with this proposal, but I believe the Register writer is correct, what they favor does do just that.

Dillon said what she is proposing does not kill the ecovillage, but I still don't understand that. She said the 200 acres they have zoned for development she wants to convert to an RR zoning, which means rural residential. There is a 10 acre limit on RR, meaning those 200 acres could have 20 homes on 10 acre parcels. That would kill the Ecovillage.

It was a big victory for SRA and the Farm Bureau, and Sierra Club today.

They are shutting down PUC and the deciding vote was Caldwell. He is paying back the Farm Bureau/No growthers for his election.

Strangely, I guess to counter his south county critics who don't want all the housing put on them, he said housing would have to be built in the upper valley somewhere. I think out of newness he might not realize there is no where else it can go. Angwin is the only spot.

Good luck to Caldwell if he thinks he can get St Helena to build housing. Calistoga? Get ready for more protests. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Jan 28, 2009 8:06 PM:

" I noticed one speaker who mentioned that ALL the growth was happening in the CITY of Napa and the CITY of American Canyon. Well, let me remind them that Angwin is NOT a CITY! Since it's not a city to begin with, comparing the growth in those cities to the growth that should happen in Angwin is like comparing apples to oranges. People outside of Angwin need to recognize that Angwin is NOT a city, not at all. And if you don't believe me, take a drive up here and check it out. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy