Sewer improvements stall at Lake Berryessa
By KERANA TODOROV
Register Staff Writer
October 5th, 2009
September 18th, 2009
September 17th, 2009
September 13th, 2009
September 12th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 13th, 2009
November 12th, 2009
November 7th, 2009
Almost two years after residents along the southern shore of Lake Berryessa agreed to pay for an overhaul of their water and sewer systems, work on the project has yet to begin.
At issue is a contract between the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the company selected a year ago to run Steele Park Resort. Bureau officials announced in April that the Pensus Group, an Arizona-based operator, had been selected to run Steele Park — as well as four other lakeside resorts — and that Pensus was expected to pay 31 percent of the $14 million water and sewer assessment.
Almost a year later, the contract has yet to be awarded.
The Napa Berryessa Residential Improvement District, a special district overseen by county officials, will not sell $14 million in bonds to upgrade the sewer and water treatment plants and build an additional water storage tank as long as the contract is not signed.
In limbo for months, district officials are considering raising water and sewer rates to pay for the costs of maintaining and improving the existing, aging infrastructure to comply with state regulators. The state Regional Water Quality Control Board determined in 2006 the district was out of compliance with state regulations.
District officials are also considering entering a contract with CalWater, a private utility, to run NBRID and the Lake Berryessa Resort Improvement District, a special district near Putah Creek.
A frustrated Napa County Supervisor Diane Dillon, who is in Washington D.C. this week to lobby federal legislators on behalf of rural counties, said she wants to meet with the legislative staff overseeing the Bureau of Reclamation. She hopes the “powers that be” will help expedite the contracts between the potential concessionaires and the bureau.
She said Friday she wants to know if Pensus Group will pay a third of the assessments.
“We don’t know that,” she said.
Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, is also getting involved. On March 3, he sent a letter to John “Bill” McDonald, acting commissioner for the Bureau of Reclamation, requesting an update on the status of the contract negotiations between the bureau and Pensus Group as well as with another would-be Berryessa resort operator. He also requested that the federal agency brief Dillon.
“I am deeply concerned with the amount of time it is taking Reclamation to negotiate new concession contracts with the Pensus Group and Markley Cove,” he wrote in his letter. “These two prospective concessionaires were successful bidders chosen last spring. Why haven’t the concession contracts been awarded? This delay has caused significant economic hardship to residents, local businesses and the county of Napa.”
Thompson’s letter may have fallen on deaf ears. “We have not received an answer to our letter yet,” Laurel Brown, spokeswoman for Thompson’s office, stated Tuesday.
The stalemate with the bureau has left Berryessa Highlands resident Tracy Renee frustrated. “It’s just totally ridiculous,” said Renee, who supported the assessment in 2007.
She has proposed a new fee to pay for the operations and maintenance of the district. “You have to be responsible,” she said this weekend. “You can’t spend the money you don’t have.”
In the meantime, NBRID representatives said they have been excluded from discussions with the bureau.
According to a March 3 memorandum from Janice Killion, attorney for the county and the district, the bureau “has excluded district staff from any discussions with the proposed concessionaire, and has not yet executed a new concession contract. It is unknown when or if Steele Park Resort will reopen, which has interfered with the district’s ability to move forward with infrastructure repairs, and has caused financial uncertainty for the district.”
Bureau of Reclamation spokeswoman Lynnette Wirth said Tuesday the contract is under review. She declined to give more details. “There is a lot at stake here,” Wirth said.
Georgi Maule-Ffinch, counsel for the Pensus Group in Arizona, said Tuesday the negotiations with the Bureau for Steele Park concluded in December. The bureau is reviewing the contract, she said.
“We’re just waiting to sign the final contract,” Maule-Ffinch said.
Meanwhile, things are winding down at Steele Park, where most mobile home owners have pulled their property out in expectation that a new concessionaire would be taking over.
Dave Hanson, the marina manager for the resort, said about 50 mobile homes are left. The motel, store and cottages have shut down.
The marina closes April 1. “It’s sad,” he said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
notwhatyouthink wrote on Mar 11, 2009 8:23 AM:
sdnapa wrote on Mar 11, 2009 9:07 AM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 11, 2009 10:31 AM:
They told the county that they were interfering with their business in a totally rude way, I forget the exact phrase but it appeared to suggest they would sue them just for asking what was going on.
In the mean time where is the money to pay for the water system? The rest of the neighborhood is depending on that, and all they were asking is what is up, what is the plan?
It was one of the rudest, most insensitive acts I have heard about from a government entitiy around here.
People ought to go picket the house of the local BOR director.
Who is this person, does anyone have a name and an email?
I wish I could remember all the details of what was said and done, it was really out there even for these government fiefdoms that often seem to feel no responsibility toward the citizens. Worse than the new septic tank rules. "
Skip M. wrote on Mar 11, 2009 12:26 PM:
napagirl76 wrote on Mar 11, 2009 7:27 PM:
bhenery wrote on Mar 11, 2009 7:51 PM:
The Bureau of Reclamation is a FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY!
You would have to go to Washington DC to picket the White House.
The problem which you could address from your ink barrrel, is the creation of County and resident funded special services districts.....Berryessa Estates etc.
These are financial and environmental failures....you might research how TRIAD hopes to make the tax payers of the county pay for their subdivision plan in ANGWIN.
Yes! The costs of sewer and water on Howell Mountain would be on our backs....TRIAD just gets the profit.
Could you do some research please? "
vocal-de-local wrote on Mar 11, 2009 10:56 PM:
I'de be interested in knowing 'how' and 'when' rural areas are put into special districts. Are they only put into special districts once problems become significant? It's a way of transferring responsibility to ALL the people living within a district even though they may not be contributing to the problem? For example, in the case of the Triad Development, Most of the present residents are on water wells. If Triad develops, new homes will be tied into the sewage system. If something goes wrong with that system, then a line is drawn around the town of Angwin and everyone must pay because it becomes a special district? We pay for an upgraded sewage system even if we do not use it?
Angwin residents should be worried. The county has made mistakes before. They can make them again. "