Angwin Eco-village planning on hold
By JILLIAN JONES
Register Staff Writer
October 31st, 2009
October 21st, 2009
July 28th, 2009
July 27th, 2009
July 22nd, 2009
November 21st, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
November 15th, 2009
The environmental study of the proposed Angwin eco-village, a key document in getting the project before Napa County officials and the public, is on hold pending the outcome of the county’s bubble debate.
Developer Curt Johansen of Triad Communities said Pacific Union College suspended work on the environmental impact review in January and will resume studies only if changes to the Angwin urban bubble are favorable for developers.
John Collins, vice president of finances for Pacific Union College, confirmed that work on the review has stopped.
“The completion of this extensive document was temporarily suspended pending the outcome of the General Plan zoning matter because of its relevance to the project application,” he said.
The decision to postpone work on the eco-village environmental review followed a December vote by the Napa County Board of Supervisors that left land use in Angwin in limbo. The issue now is bouncing between the Planning Commission and the board, and is expected to be resolved at the end of April. Previous discussions suggest that the changes to the Angwin urban bubble — the area in which residential or commercial development could take place — will likely not keep the eco-village proposal from being heard later this year.
“We decided that it would be wise to let this get sorted out,” Johansen said.
“Until the county votes later this month, the college doesn’t have certainty that those 63 acres are not going to be changed,” he added.
Collins said that if the compromise on the table is ultimately approved, “We will proceed to complete the EIR as quickly as possible and look to distribute it publicly this summer.”
Johansen acknowledges there are both financial and political reasons for wanting to wait on the environmental review.
Given the $3 million to $4 million cost of generating the eco-village environmental review, it makes good financial sense to wait for a decision from the county, he said.
“It would be costly to continue and finish a document like that that would never be allowed to have a public hearing process,” he said.
There are also political reasons for wanting to wait, according to Johansen.
“Politically,” he said, “the issue is if, in fact, the supervisors were going to go in a different direction, that would cause the college to reevaluate the direction they were headed in terms of their property rights.”
Both Collins and Johansen say the environmental review is about 80 percent complete, though Napa County Planning Director Hillary Gitelman said that may be overly optimistic.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
angwindeac wrote on Apr 2, 2009 1:55 PM:
bhenery wrote on Apr 3, 2009 9:38 PM:
How in the world could they have finished 80% of the environmental review? Oh, I forgot it is all made up numbers and technical stuff that has no real meaning.
Hey this looks like a perfect time for TRIAD to get back to Vallejo and look at the broken promises they made there! "