NVR Logo
The local’s view of fiasco at the lake
In a fourth look at Berryessa, a Highlands resident weighs in
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Save and Share Share
The crisis at Lake Berryessa is about boat ramps and contracts and government agencies.

But there are human consequences to the troubles at the lake, which is on the verge of entering its second consecutive visitor year with inadequate services for the 1.5 million expected to come up to boat, relax and enjoy the scenery.
Tracy Renee, who joined a Register editorial board meeting last week along with Napa County Supervisor Diane Dillon and Bureau of Reclamation district official Mike Finnegan, has lived in Berryessa Highlands for 23 years. She raised her three children there, and said the lake is “like my heaven,” a respite before and after long days running a business in Vallejo. Here is what she told us about the situation from her perspective:

• One of the casualties at the lake is tiny Capell Valley Elementary School. As families that worked at some of the several closed resorts left, Capell lost students.
“My kids went to Capell School,” said Renee. “Capell, to me , is part of the community. It’s where kids meet each other. It’s where adults meet each other.”

The long-term prospects for Capell are uncertain for reasons greater than the lake fiasco. Both it and Wooden Valley Elementary may be closed by school district officials next year because they are not cost-efficient. But the loss of vibrancy at the lake struck another blow against Capell.
• The legal clashes, one between the Bureau of Reclamation and the owners of the trailers that were based at the resort for decades; the other between the bureau and former resort operators.

The bureau prevailed in both disputes, forcing the mobile home owners to remove their personal  property — though hundreds have not complied – and denying compensation to resort operators for installation of roads retaining walls and other features they built while running their businesses.

“On the lawsuits,” Renee said, “I see both ides of that.”

Renee said that if she were a resort operator, she would have had a “heart attack” if presented with news that she’d receive no compensation for her investment in the property, even though all operators were clearly on long-term leases. “Now,” she said, “you walk away with nothing.”

As for the trailers, she said she understand why the mobile home owners would fight the eviction, but isn’t sympathetic about their refusal to accept the outcome. “Get out,” she said. “Quit whining.”

• Renee said the closure of at least four resorts this year could wreak havoc. “How many of those 1. 5 million (annual visitors) have no idea the resorts are going to be closed?” she asked.

The county is asking the same thing, and Supervisor Dillon said she is working with the bureau, Napa County Sheriff’s Department, firefighters and others to come up with a plan to salvage the summer. While the effort is designed to curb the negative impact of visitors overwhelming the limited facilities, it will have a huge effect on lakeside business and the quality of life of residents.
6 comment(s)

lberryessa wrote on Apr 15, 2009 9:12 AM:

" Tracy, I’m not sympathetic about the Highlands residence refusal to accept the outcome of not being able to use Steele Park. It was one of your Highlands neighbor to thank for assisting the BOR in the new environmentalist friendly lake berryessa. Where was the Berryessa Highlands support when we whiners needed it? Berryessa was "like my heaven" too; sorry you’re having trouble with yours. "

winelink wrote on Apr 15, 2009 9:50 AM:

" It is going on the third summer of resorts closed on the west side of the lake.
The fishermen and others use this resource all year long so we are not just talking about a few months in the summer. I am frustrated beyond belief to hear more lies from the BOR about anything they may or may not be doing to expedite this transition. The fact is they have no investment here. They are untouchable. They wouldn't last one week in the real world where people who are incompetent or malfeasant are fired.
They are above the law.
Diane Dillon says there is nothing she can do, Congressmen Thompson says his hands are tied-Just who represents "The People"? This is absurd-if the problem in the original contracts has been identified then why oh why must we wait another four months for the prospectus? There were only six bidders on the original prospectus-who will invest for improvements when there is no reward?
I agree with Landshark, Reclamation is 100% accountable, responsible and potentially criminal for the destruction of our community and also for the loss of millions of dollars, hundreds of jobs and the unfortunate loss of recreation at Lake Berryessa for the foreseeable future. "

Landshark wrote on Apr 15, 2009 9:50 AM:

" Responding to comments in the article above, as required by the infamous Bureau of Reclamation we did in fact remove our mobile home in August 2006.

Recreation at lake berryessa was (key word "was") very important to our family and now we all see what inexpierenced planning and agency deception do to a community.

I would suggest that the comments "get out & quit whining" be redirected to the Bureau of Reclamation. A previous NVR article quoted Mr. Finnegan that "Reclamtion was held up due to the election, former concessionaires and former permitee's."

Get over it? The local property values are devastated, small - medium business are financially impacted, building moritorium in forced, no concessions on the west shoreline, estiamted 1.5 million visitors and Supervisor Dillon is working on a plan along with the other pirates of Lake Berryessa.

OK, The next NVR article should be sharing alot of good news regarding Lake Berryessa's latest plan. "

exiled wrote on Apr 15, 2009 4:49 PM:

" It was always such an obvious a scam. Circa 1999 the resorts were doing a bang up business. Leased spots with personal property atop free traded for as much as $250,000. Drought behind us the place was thriving. You could just feel the envious BOR and many local homeowners jealous of the e-ticket access. They needed to thwart this devious free enterprise behavior on public land thus the federal shell game. Take away the worth from those who developed it and resell it. Base it on the end of a lease and a fabricated clambering public. Let's review... Extortion based on Envy, not business sense. Mark my words, It will be exclusive use again. Time share, park Model, whatever becomes... somebody will get that worth the Feds embezzled. The ideal client was in place all along... At my resort 99% of us worked together and got our stuff out before any lawsuit decisions. It was heartbreaking but I'm proud of us all. We're not whining... we're gone. Your on your own now. "

766husky wrote on Apr 20, 2009 8:33 PM:

" I was fishing below what is left of Rancho Monticello earlier today, After loaning gas to one boater who did not know the resorts where closed, I stoped the boat and just listened to nothing no kids running around no boats no anything, this is sad time and for the BOR to blame anyone but the selves is just insane, they said years go"we dont care if anyone uses the lake" sure do ring true now "

philcovell wrote on Apr 20, 2009 10:19 PM:

" not to go to the lake is my choice why support some thing that has stabbed you in the back and then gets rewarded for it through a stimilus "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy