Restoring trust at Berryessa
The Bureau of Reclamation needs to communicate better.
October 5th, 2009
September 18th, 2009
September 17th, 2009
September 13th, 2009
September 12th, 2009
Last week’s Register editorial board meeting regarding Lake Berryessa was eye-opening in that so many factors have contributed to the current crisis, in which several lakeside resorts promise to be closed again this year while, if we are lucky, others will limp to life in time to salvage the summer recreational season.
Among the contributing factors:
• A long, grueling and contentious planning process;
• Disputes between the federal government and lake habitués regarding Public Law 96375, which governs who is responsible for private property on some public lands, and the Anti-Deficiency Act, which bars the government from promising to spend money (on compensating lakeside concessionaires for the value of improvements, for example) it doesn’t have or can’t account for;
• The obstinate opposition to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s positive and forward-looking plans for the lake;
• The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s own failure to draft the new concession contracts correctly and communicate fully with the diverse crowd that cares about Berryessa.
Mike Finnegan, the Bureau of Reclamation official who joined Napa County Supervisor Diane Dillon and Berryessa Highlands resident Tracy Renee at the meeting, said, “We could have done a much better job” of communicating as the resort contract process dragged on. He said the bureau was “overly sensitive about not corrupting the negotiating process” with the prospective operators of the seven lakeside concessions.
Dillon, who said she works well with Finnegan, added that she believes the bureau “can use a lot more transparency.”
At the moment, everyone seems to be talking. The bureau is meeting with likely short-term operators of three resorts. It is talking regularly with Dillon and the office of Rep. Mike Thompson, D- St. Helena.
With a new round of contract discussions, the bureau will be talking to a range of potential operators.
It is important for the short-term and long-term success at the lake that the bureau maintain the fullest level of communication. Like it or not, there are many who distrust the agency and it needs to work to earn their trust if it wants to see its Berryessa vision come to life.
Said Finnegan: “Working together in partnership with Napa County and (the Lake Berryessa) Chamber of Commerce, we want to move forward constructively and get it done.”
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
WORD wrote on Apr 17, 2009 12:57 AM:
notwhatyouthink wrote on Apr 17, 2009 8:32 AM:
mikeb wrote on Apr 17, 2009 9:14 AM:
dellasumbrella wrote on Apr 17, 2009 12:21 PM:
glenroy wrote on Apr 17, 2009 2:21 PM:
Most, if not all, the major issues that led to this mess were decided behind closed doors amongst the collaborative agencies, BOR, Quail Ridge WC, Land Trust, Sierra Club, UC Davis and to lesser extent Napa Country Board of Supervisors, California Fish & Game and BLM, before long before the public hearings. The overwhelming majority of those who spoke at the hearings said this was going to happen…and it didn’t take an Einstein to figure that out…remove half the income from the resorts and guess what? Half the income goes somewhere else….remaining income isn’t sufficient to sustain the business…duh.
So the did what they set out to do….a ghost recreation lake.…. "
Landshark wrote on Apr 17, 2009 10:17 PM:
The VSP began in 2000, we all had knowledge of the expiration dates of each of the resorts and the Bureau of Reclamation was so focused on "exclusive use" terminology and ejecting each and every permitee that a plan was NOT put together.
A phased plan implementing change and measuring progess would of been the intelligent task at hand however the Bureau of Reclamation would prefer to devastate recreation and have more kayak "put - ins".
How's the former Boy Scout camp doing these days Messer's Finnegan, Lucero, Wadlington & Thompson? "
clean and serene wrote on Apr 17, 2009 11:54 PM:
Then maybe then they would be able to cover this story accurately. "
winelink wrote on Apr 18, 2009 1:09 PM:
The consensus was to improve the resorts and ammenities offered to the tax paying public that use this resource and none of us living here, working here or doing business here ever suggested leaving the area status quo. Quite contrary we reformed the Chamber of Commerce and the community banded together to voice our opinions on the possibilities going forward. The BOR had a different agenda and The obvious problem unfortunately for all concerned is the inability of the BOR to accomplish the task at hand in a tmely manner with minimal impact on the community and visiting public.
All the residents and business people involved that I ever talked with wanted was truth and fairness from officials, elected and otherwise.
Good common sense with upgrading while remaining accesible to visitors was a very important piece that was completely left out by the BOR despite the constant reassurances from the BOR stating otherwise.
I am disgusted with the BORs laundry list of excuses for their failure to perform and wish our supervisor/congressman/other elected officials would get some cajones and represent the needs of the people they are supposed to represent and get things moving quickly with Interim Contracts while the Bureaucrats hash out the details over the next several years.
The Scout Camp? Oakshores for camping? Time is waisting!! "
berryessababe wrote on Apr 18, 2009 3:29 PM:
WORD wrote on Apr 18, 2009 7:48 PM:
But this is a separate issue from the revised plan for recreation at the lake. That planning process was followed as it should have been and was opened fully for years for public input and debate. Resort goers, owners, managers and their friends found through the process that their views and plans had no greater credence than those of any other citizen interested in the future of the lake. The lake, surrounding community, and public in general deserve a better future than the former resort interests envisioned. I’m encouraged to see their view lost out. There’s plenty of evidence that their performance as stewards of the lake over the past several decades was as poor, if not worse, than that of any government agency with responsibilities at the lake.
None of us can wave a magic wand to smooth over the impacts caused by public agency mistakes or general economic malaise to businesses near the lake. We CAN contribute to a solution though, by learning to appreciate the place more for its inherent values and offering some time and attention to members of the community there. It beats whining! "
winelink wrote on Apr 19, 2009 10:11 PM:
Sayso wrote on Apr 20, 2009 7:50 PM:
Get on with the new recreation. Seems like wine-ing at Berryessa will never stop with some people. "
766husky wrote on Apr 20, 2009 8:21 PM: