Six reasons why California is ungovernable
And promising steps for what is being done about it
By Jerry Roberts and Phil Trounstine
California today is ungovernable.
As state and local officials struggle to weather the state’s fiscal crisis, they wield power with the damaged machinery of a patchwork government system that lacks accountability, encourages stalemate and drifts but cannot be steered.
Here is a look at six key factors that have made California impossible to govern.
• Proposition 13: The fiscal effect of Proposition 13, the property tax limit measure passed in 1978, is only part of the damage the initiative did to California. After Proposition 13 passed, then-Gov. Jerry Brown and the Democrat-dominated Legislature realigned — “tangled” would be more accurate — the relationship between state and local governments by effectively shifting control of remaining property-tax revenue to Sacramento. They took power and responsibility for health, welfare, schools and other local services away from city councils, boards of supervisors and school boards, thereby establishing today’s chaotic maze of overlapping jurisdictions.
• Budget initiatives: Proposition 13 also ushered in an era of ballot-box budgeting, as fiscal initiatives became a favored special-interest tool. A series of post-13 initiatives — including measures creating the lottery, financing public schools by mathematical formula and earmarking revenues for special programs, from mental health to medical care — established an exquisitely complex state budget calculus that has hamstrung the rational operations of government.
• Gerrymandering: The once-a-decade process of redrawing political maps based on the census has created an increasingly partisan Capitol atmosphere. Reapportionment has become essentially an incumbent protection effort.
• Term Limits: Despite the claims of backers, the 1990 term-limits initiative did not get rid of career politicians — it simply changed the arc of their careers. Instead of spending decades in the same Assembly or Senate district seat, legislators position themselves for the next office — or job as a lobbyist — as soon as they arrive in Sacramento. The up-or-out system rewards short-term, self-interested political thinking more than long-term policymaking in the public interest.
• Boom-and-Bust taxation: Since Proposition 13, state government has become increasingly dependent on volatile sources of revenue — the sales, corporation and progressive personal income taxes — that correspond closely to the business cycle. When economic times are good, as during the dot-com and housing bubbles, money pours in and there’s little political incentive — in fact, term limits create a perverse disincentive — for long-term financial planning.
• The two-thirds vote: California is one of only three states requiring a two-thirds legislative vote to pass a budget, one of 16 requiring a two-thirds vote to raise taxes — and the only state to require both. The budget requirement has been in the state constitution since the New Deal; the tax restriction began with Proposition 13. In the polarized atmosphere of Sacramento, the two-thirds rules effectively hand a veto to the minority party. Under these conditions, stalemate and deadlock on key fiscal issues have become the political norm.
So what can be done about the dysfunction?
In the next few weeks, a blue-ribbon commission is set to recommend sweeping changes in the tax system to stabilize revenue collections. Voters in fall 2008 approved Proposition 11, which takes away the Legislature’s power to draw its own districts in favor of an independent commission. In 2010, as they elect a new governor, Californians also will vote on a system of “open primary” elections aimed at aiding moderates, and they also will probably decide on one or more initiatives to dump the two-thirds budget vote requirement.
California Forward, a bipartisan good government group financed by major foundations, is crafting proposals to conform government systems and processes to modern management methods. And the business-oriented Bay Area Council is pushing initiatives for a state constitutional convention, the first since 1879, to wipe the slate clean and build a new rational structure for state government.
(Roberts and Trounstine cover California politics at calbuzz.com. This essay first appeared in the Los Angeles Times.)
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
fmmt47 wrote on Jun 27, 2009 6:22 AM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Jun 27, 2009 6:51 AM:
Republican Nirvana has come to California, and "We, the People..." are going to have to throw them out and clean up the mess.
The latest idea to fix California's budget by lowering taxes on the rich and raising taxes on rest of us are another 'idea' that is transparently bad.
Lotsa good sounding, poll-tested words -- BAD ideas.
~Ruff "
charliesheen wrote on Jun 27, 2009 7:52 AM:
By far the biggest whopper in this piece is laying blame on the 2/3 majority requirement. Claiming that eliminating this would somehow straighten out the budget process smells to high heaven.
California does not have a revenue problem. It has a spending problem. Plain and simple. "
glenroy wrote on Jun 27, 2009 8:26 AM:
The facts aren’t that difficult to obtain, the state budge has grown roughly 10 times faster than the state population and twice as fast as the economy… since prop 13 was passed by the voters…all revenues steams left as they were when prop 13 passed, had prop 13 not passed state revenue would not have been sufficient to keep up with this uncontrolled spending… because it would have bankrupted the wage earning home owners killing the real estate market.
This state is ungovernable because one simple and fundamental reason, we have elected incompetent legislators who have no business experience, no management or leadership skills….with a long history of pandering to special interests. Heck we see it with our Country Supervisors who derive income from public entities and then turnaround and vote on issues related to that entity.
The state doesn’t need another Blue Ribbon Committee….it needs non- partisan social studies taught in every grade and an amended constitution limiting state spending to a flat percent of the state GDP. "
kevin wrote on Jun 27, 2009 8:51 AM:
If the voters start tinkering with Prop 13 they better realize that the ONLY result will be ever higher taxes.
California ranked #6 in the country for the highest taxes BEFORE the Democrats (and few RINOs) in the Legislature imposed their recent HUGE tax increase!
We don't need more taxes! Which is exactly what will happen if Prop 13 is changed or the 2/3 requirement is eliminated. "
PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Jun 27, 2009 11:01 AM:
The constant whining that the two thirds requirement is the problem is just standard talking points and smoke screen for Democrat tax raisers. The Republicans get blame too, they have sold themselves out for votes. Used to be when a politician was bought, he stayed bought, but not any more.
And ruff, are only the rich going to pay the higher DMV fees, state park fees, sales taxes and other tax money grabs that the Democrats want? It looks like everyone, especially the low and middle income groups are having their taxes raised by the Democrats. How can you continue writing about how the Democrats are not raising taxes on the middle class, when it is so obvious that is just not true? I suppose you have to stick to that tired old party line, but at the national level Obama has already trashed that campaign promise. Maybe it's time both parties were forced out of power.
It is time to split California into at least two or three states. One California for the socialist program lovers, who can live there and raise their taxes all they want. Another California for those who know how to live within their means and can therefore pay lower taxes.
However, the low tax California will have to build and patrol a border wall to keep the socialists out, once they figure out that their system doesn't work. They keep trying, and the socialist experiment keeps failing. When will they ever learn? "
PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Jun 27, 2009 11:10 AM:
Raven wrote on Jun 27, 2009 11:24 AM:
freeport56 wrote on Jun 27, 2009 1:17 PM:
The verbage is definately Democrat, attacking the 2/3 majoreit vote and Prop 13. Broken Record Ruff is lost in progressive land blame the Republicans for the overspending of the Democrats. Reality for some is their own tiny world.
So I can assume that this disguised attempt by the Democrats is to do way with the safeguards that have always protected the minority voices in the legislature. Who else would cook up such outrageous statements without pointing out the real iussues. Over regulation of the market place, too m,uch spending without any returns, no programs to encourage a better business climate, environmental laws to destroy business and industry, and an ever growing thirst to control our lives.
The Deomcrats must sure think we are stupid, not to see through their game. I for one do not my state and country turned into a third world nation by the Fascisit State of CA or our NEW Central Government!
Ruff you really actually address the issues and stop the name calling. It is after all part of the rules. "
Ruff Limblog wrote on Jun 27, 2009 3:54 PM:
I discussed Republican ideology and it's failure to bring good government to California.
That is within the rules, even if some Republicans consider a little truth-telling to be name-calling.
As an aside, I would consider it to be an answered prayer to see Sarah Palin at the top of a Republican ticket in California.
~Ruff "
kdbk wrote on Jun 27, 2009 4:39 PM:
Tens of billions of dollars spent on services for illegal immigrants is the primary culprit in the California budget debacle, as it is in other western states too. Liberals like YOU have supported the cause of mass illegal immigration at every turn. Your absurd attack on Republicans is empty rhetoric.
Increasing burdens on private business has been a legislative habit in California for decades, supported by LIBERALS like you all the way. The exodus of business from CA has had devestaing effects. Liberals bid them farewell and care nothing for the impact on communities and lives.
General waste and abuse of public monies to fund one of the world's top ten welfare agencies has further driven California to the brink. Liberals like you have pushed for as much spending on social programs as possible, WITHOUT regard for the consequences you were warned about.
Sorry, Ruff, pack an extra sandwich in your lunch pail next time you come to play here. "
Enlightened Coelacanth wrote on Jun 27, 2009 5:22 PM:
You've had a Democratically run state for decades (despite some tepid rhino governors) who have treated California and it's resources like the proverbial golden goose that can never die.
The leftist ideologues have bankrupted the state with their bankrupt political philosophy but they will never admit it because they seem literally blind to the truth.
The body politic, state and national, is dying from the disease of leftism that has been injected in the system.
Perhaps we should create a red and blue California. I'd surely rather live in a state run by adults than pie in the sky dupes who have run this state in the ground. "
skeptic wrote on Jun 27, 2009 5:34 PM:
when homes were $600,000 it meant the people who "bought " it actually had to pay $500 rent to the state every month in addition to their payments to the original owner or bank.kind of like never really owning a home since the rent goes on forever.
of course those numbers go down in a depression as do payroll taxes. everybody has to cut spending when there is less money .
sacramento is beginning to get that message.
increasing taxes on homeowners will only cause more foreclosures.
that's all we need at a time when they are increasing like crazy already. "
Raven wrote on Jun 27, 2009 7:42 PM:
PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Jun 27, 2009 10:19 PM:
I'll start. My plan is "Cut state spending". Maybe not original, but catchy, doncha think? Sounds better than "Enormous Tax Increases on Everyone for Nothing".
First we stop the "we have to fire teachers, firemen etc." argument. There are hundreds of state agencies that do little but overlap with other state agencies. Get rid of them.
Cut the overhead in the departments, the huge number of 'management' employees that do little and get six figure salaries. Have an independent audit of management performance vs. money spent. That should be interesting.
Cut legislator salary and staff allowances. They should only meet every other year, we already have enough laws from them.
Find some way to undo the dedicated spending for special interest groups that has been passed in the last 20 years in California. Have a rule that any ballot initiative funding scheme can be authorized for only two years and cannot be renewed without an independent audit showing taxpayers how the money was spent. If voters like it, they'll vote for it again.
Redistrict the legislature using natural community boundaries. Get rid of gerrymandered districts, some of them just thin little strips holding together areas to create safe political fiefdoms. That is not fair representation, and we haven't had fair representation in CA for decades.
These are just a few and there's lots more. Anyone else with ideas of where to "Cut state spending" without using the words "Tax Increases"? "
John Richards wrote on Jun 27, 2009 10:53 PM:
That topic has been discussed here several times already. A good start would be to eliminate all benefits for illegal aliens. I don't see your recommendations here, Raven.
'Pot -- kettle -- black' comes to mind. "
Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Jun 27, 2009 11:28 PM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Jun 27, 2009 11:59 PM:
We've been seeing stagnant wages for working class America since Ronald Reagan, and falling wages since George W. Bush.
Folks with peon wages, or worse, no jobs at all, can not buy goods and so the downward spiral continues...
"Cutting government spending" is what made the First Republican Great Depression such a fearsome monster. A Republican president named Herbert Hoover tried cutting spending and balancing budgets until the American people threw the Republicans out of office.
Republican Nirvana in California.
It's not going to end until Republicans are reduced below the 1/3 level in the state senate.
~Ruff "
PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Jun 28, 2009 11:20 AM:
Seems like hanging on to political ideology and throwing blame at others is more important than solving the problem. "
kevin wrote on Jun 28, 2009 5:43 PM:
2001 4.7
2002 5.8
2003 6.0
2004 5.5
2005 5.1
2006 4.6
2007 4.6
2008 5.8
2009 unemployment rate is currently running 9.4%.
Welcome to Obamanomics... "
John Richards wrote on Jun 28, 2009 7:57 PM:
Right now it doesn't matter who supports it. What matters is what can be done right now to cut state spending. "
Alter ego wrote on Jun 29, 2009 11:33 AM:
And in reality probably much, much more. "
Raven wrote on Jun 29, 2009 1:40 PM:
John Richards wrote on Jun 30, 2009 10:37 PM:
I'm afraid your list will come nowhere near closing the $40 billion budget shortfall. "
5th generation napan wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:36 AM:
Two problems exist, #1 tell me which legislature or senator has a financial background. The percentage is miniscule. #2 Govenor S, hit the nail on the head. California should hold off one year and base the budget on its "known income in the coffers", and not on speculative guesses of what we think will come in this year.
Its total idiocy and crystal ball wishing making a budge guessing at how much they think we have to spend.
But that would take too much power of lying away from the senate. They could no longer say 'gee we didn't anticipate that'. "
Raven wrote on Jul 1, 2009 9:10 AM:
I see the GOP has yet to even submit a proposal that meets their criteria, seems all they know how to do is say no....they seem to be unable to even present an alternative budget and because of their disapproval and gov's veto yesterday the deficit is now 2 billion more....at 26 billion and we're are issuing IOUs which no bank has said they will accept yet.
That will really help the small businessmen that do business with the state, a supposed concern of the GOP. "
Mr4 wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:18 AM:
I actually agree with you on the initiatives. The system is creating too many unfunded mandates and generally serves only special interests.
Beyond that, California's biggest problem is its explosion of Administrative Law. There are far too many regulatory agencies adding too much cost and complexity to living and working in California. I recommend a constitutional amendment sunsetting (terminating) every administrative agency after a set period of years. In order to continue, each agency should be required to re-justify its existence and it should be required to re-write its administrative code to clear out the dead wood. "
post-it wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:27 AM:
Or better yet, eliminate pensions altogether and let state and federal workers save into a 401K like the rest of the working stiffs do. "
Raven wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:51 AM:
Mr4 wrote on Jul 2, 2009 1:31 PM:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTv1Dmu5CYc "
post-it wrote on Jul 2, 2009 2:52 PM:
notalwaysright wrote on Jul 4, 2009 2:07 PM:
notalwaysright wrote on Jul 4, 2009 2:09 PM:
Wealthy people would never let us have a voice...
They're going to here mine though anyway. Every chance I get! "
NVR Brian Kennedy wrote on Jul 4, 2009 5:29 PM:
Just a reminder - If you see a comment that violates our guidelines please email online@napanews.com. We read all the comments, but things still slip through. "