NVR Logo
Summer school misses its mark
Friday, July 03, 2009
Save and Share Share
November 17th, 2009
October 21st, 2009
September 14th, 2009
Summer School

Monday I start summer school. For most of my years of teaching I worked the summers. Many people think teachers get paid over the summers, but that's not quite true. I only get paid for the 183 days a year I work. That pay is spread out over the 12 months of the year so that teachers don't experience a disruption of cash flow during the summers when they are effectively laid off. 
Many teachers appreciate the time to enjoy a vacation, or take training or just do nothing. For myself, having children necessitates extra money, so any chance I had to make some, I took it.

The last few years, however, I managed to avoid summer school. For one thing, I finally made it to the pay level where the extra money was more a luxury than a necessity. I enjoyed the time off with my kids more and I found  I was in a much better mood when school started in August.  Other teachers who make less than me could work during the summer.
Another reason for skipping summer school, though, was I found it a miserable experience. In California, all students who currently take summer school do so from necessity. They failed a course and have to make it up.  Most are not great students to begin with and their scholarship does not improve during the summer. They are resentful and surly, They view summer school as a punishment rather than an opportunity. They don't want to do the work and frankly, summer school is harder than regular school, you have to do more in less time.

It is not fun teaching.
California's method of funding summer school also makes it difficult. 

The school district gets paid for students who fill the seats. If they are not there, we don't get money. This can be a problem for the administrators running the program. They have to pay teachers, so each class has to have a minimum number of students to pay for itself. That means that as the summer progresses, administrators are reluctant to send misbehaving students home.

My favorite summer school programs were the ones in Georgia. There summer school was paid for by the students. Talk about a completely different attitude. One phone call was all it took to straighten a student out. 

This year my school district is having summer school for our middle school students. It is part of the retention policy that is being implemented. All of my students have failed math and will be retained if they don't pass the final exam the district gives at the end of the summer school session. For the next four weeks, two hours a class, we will review the 10 or so core standards of 7th grade math. It is not perfect, but it is a start at holding students accountable for their education. That's why I have come out of my summer school “retirement” (that and I was the only math teacher willing to do it).  It beats just passing them on to the 8th grade.

Personally, I think the idea that summer school is for remedial work is a flawed one.  The money would be better spent in classes where students want to be there. I wish there were classes where students are taking extra credits to graduate early or just because they wanted them. It is much more fun teaching students who enjoy learning and are motivated. It is also a better message: “We will provide opportunities to excel and get ahead” rather than “you failed so now you have to do it again.”

You can't sell that, however, to the people who make these kinds of decisions. The money just isn't there. I guess it's a question of priorities.

It is a real shame, in my opinion. Some of my favorite classes in college were the ones I took over the summer. The atmosphere was more relaxed and since the class was condensed, it allowed me to focus better on the subject. I never minded spending my vacation time in the classroom when I felt it was worthwhile. I imagine there are lots of students who feel the same way.

At any rate, come Monday I will be back in the saddle riding herd on 33 students who for the most part would rather be in bed. I will do my best to make it as painless as possible ... I can be real mean if I have to be, but I prefer easy-going. Some will take advantage of the second chance and while it may not be fun, at least it will be profitable. 

At least those students won't have to see me again in the fall.
25 comment(s)

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jun 23, 2009 5:45 PM:

" Studies have found that paying students for grades raises scores. An additional sum should be set aside for the college expenses of every student who scores in the top 10%.

You should not be the only person in the classroom receiving a check. And you should get a bonus based on the grade payments made to the students at the end of the summer.

~Ruff "

kevin wrote on Jun 23, 2009 5:59 PM:

" And to top it all off the Democrats in the Legislature have cut the legs out from under the Dept of Education by voting to ELIMINATE the requirement to pass the High School Graduation Exam. (You would still have to take the exam, it just wouldn't matter if you pass or fail.) "

Bill wrote on Jun 23, 2009 9:12 PM:

" Teacher,

Nice to see your pieces, considering your passion for the educational system I hope you will provide more than opinion. Summer school brings up another point and that is, why we do not have year around schooling instead of the summer vacation waste? That might be a good topic for one of your blogs. It would be more efficient use of facilities and personnel. The need to divide the school year as it currently is passed away long ago.

It would be a giant step forward in the modernization of American education. It is a very big step that we appear to be dodging or at least educators appear to be dodging. Thre are several ways it could be handled successfully.

Good luck in this endeavor but don’t try and bluff too often or use your position as a teacher as the ultimate source of authority on educational matters. You never really know who you are talking to out here in the blowgosphere, too many invent knowledge they do not posses, others rely on their words to carry their views.

I would prefer the weight of your words and attributable sources in your blogs than appeals to personal knowledge, experience and expertise. Life experience is a valid point of description but not as sustainable fact. Each of us has experience we view as valid and important but just because I am a shop keeper does not give me expertise as a business tycoon.

Your blog has slipped out here with little fan fare. sometimes there is an extra click or page to wade trhough to find all the blogs. "

a teacher wrote on Jun 24, 2009 6:47 AM:

" Ruff: I've seen reports about paying students for good grades. It's not without controversy. For one thing, some object to the implied racism of the idea (you can always motivate "those people" with money).

To me it's just the same old, same old - addressing the symptom with a quick fix. Why isn't learning and being the best you can be a reward in itself? What is wrong with us as a country that we have to bribe our children to do better in school?

On the other hand, I can't argue with successful results.

Bill-I would love to see year round school, or at least a longer school year. I think we would see better outcomes if we did. Personally, I wouldn't be laid off every summer, so it would be lucrative for me. And there is the problem.

In order to lengthen the school year we have to spend more money - about 10% for each month just for teacher salaries. From what I can see, no one is willing to pay for that.

As for more facts and less opinion, I'll keep that in mind.

Kevin - So the Graduation Exam doesn't count? News to me and all the students taking it. "

winemd wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:36 PM:

" As a parent, we hve our own "summer school" but we can focus on things the children want to learn. My son did a brief report on solar eclipses, and is learning about robotics now. My daughter did a power point about manatees. We are also working on spelling and penmanship, but trying to have fun with it. I got a coloring book for my 2 year old so he can do it with them and feel like a big boy, although often he goes to play trains instead, which is fine. We are having fun learning, and it's a great excuse to go to the library often.

One model of year round schooling does not increase the number of days of instructional time, but rearranges them so that the breaks are more even. Right now students attend about 180 days of school in a year, out of 260 weekdays. I don't know that you could push it much past 200 school days, which would leave 60 days for holidays and breaks. The students do need some time to be children, too. "

Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jun 24, 2009 3:15 PM:

" Teacher-
"Why isn't learning and being the best you can be a reward in itself?"

We ARE kids. MOst of us would rather be playing soccer. The attitude of the teacher makes a huge difference. My sicial studies teacher lets us talk (not during tests, though) we just have to get the stuff done. He jokes with us, so it's not boring.

My only "motivation" is knowing that I won't be able to afford the car I want, which happens to be a 2.3 million dollar Aston Martin, if I don't get a 4.0. I want that car, so I get good grades. Besides, I've always been good aaat multi tasking... "

a teacher wrote on Jun 24, 2009 6:54 PM:

" winemd-I think summer vacations are far too long and research shows it actually sets kids back (they forget a lot over that time). My favorite schedule was the one I had in Kenya, roughly 3 months of school and one month off for a total of 190 days. A long enough vacation to enjoy and recharge, but not too long. That certainly would be doable here.

Angelina-I reject the idea that being a kid means that you don't like to learn new things. I, for one, have always sought out new things to learn, since I was very little. I think that's true of most children.

You may object to being forced to learn something, or being directed in the learning process, but that is also part of "being a kid". You will spend far more years as an adult than you will as a kid and you need to be prepared for that. Learning self control and discipline are part of growing up.

I have to say that I have a bit of a problem with "letting kids be kids" concept. What exactly does that mean? Why isn't learning things part of that? They don't have that concept in the countries that are kicking our butts on those international Math tests we complain about. In those countries children are always in the process of becoming adults. I am not anti fun, but I have to wonder how much of our poor education results are part of our over indulgence of kid culture. "

kevin wrote on Jun 24, 2009 9:04 PM:

" Abandoning High School Exit Exams Would Be a Mistake
By Peter Schrag


In the continuing deficit-driven meltdown of California’s schools, universities and other public services, the proposed suspension and possible abandonment of the state’s high school exit exam amounts to barely a bubble. Its most useful consequence is to call attention to the magnitude of the larger disaster. But it reflects a dangerous confusion among people who should know better.

The rationale of those who want to suspend it is that at a time when the state’s budget deficit is leading to multi-billion-dollar school funding cuts it’s unfair to penalize students for failing to learn the things, however important, that the underfunded schools can’t afford to teach them.

“Why would you hold kids accountable to a standard,” said Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, “that we’re not providing the resources for them to meet?”

But anyone who’s been around a few years knows that a lot of people, especially in the teachers unions, have wanted to get rid of high stakes examinations even in good times.

http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2009/06/abandoning_high.html "

a teacher wrote on Jun 24, 2009 9:34 PM:

" Well, Kevin, that IS news. To be accurate, though, 6 Democrats in a committee recommended ditching the test, not the entire legislature.

It won't happen. Parents like the test too much. Personally I think it's been watered down so much that it is more of an nuisance and with that in mind, those democrats have a point. It's a waste of money to give it. Make it a real test. Bring back regents exams. Let students show what they know. "

Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jun 25, 2009 8:33 AM:

" Teacher-
That's not what I meant, I'm sorry you took it the wrong way. What I meant is that almost all of us will not be motivated by learning new things. We need the stuff to be taught in a way that we aren't just writing down note after note after note without anyone joking around. This is why I love my teachers at Redwood..they let us talk, they deviate from what the state wants us to do because that method of teaching doesn't work! Only maybe 10 out of 160 kids on my "team" (group with all the same teachers for core classes) had to go to summer school. The teachers always joked around with us about stuff we cared about. It made the classes fun, even if the stuff being taught wasn't. I remember more dates and confusing names from Social Studies then I ever thought possible because the class was fun!

My math teacher let us talk, when she wasn't talking to the class, as well. She intentionally put us by people we liked, so w could talk to them. And hardly anyone failed math tests!

Someone should seriously consider hiring a kid to help plan the things we're supposed to learn. I'm willing to bet test scores will go up... "

Lee wrote on Jun 25, 2009 8:44 AM:

" Just a suggestion. We lived in Kentucky before we moved out here. We were fortunate in that the town library was just a block and a half from our home. During the summer, every Saturday, the library staff would have a childrens day. Our children would go to the library every Saturday and spend most of the morning. They had story telling, movies, help with reading as well as help with chosing books to bring home to read. All of my children would bring home there limit of books for the week. They really missed that when we moved out here. Maybe it would be helpful if schools could make there libraries available for the children during the summer. It would be a big encouragement for children who wanted to learn, and I believe there are still many children who want to learn and don't need to be bribed with payment. "

a teacher wrote on Jun 25, 2009 10:24 AM:

" Angelina - I did not misunderstand what you said. I hear the same thing every day from my students. I'm calling you on it. I don't believe that someone as bright as you are is motivated by the thought of having a fancy car when they grow up.

A few misconceptions to clear up. The state does NOT dictate how I teach, they dictate WHAT I teach. There are 160 standards for Math 7 that are to be taught. How I do that is up to me.

The local district may set a district wide standard of when things are to be taught. This can be controversial with teachers who think that they should determine the order in which they teach a particular thing. I have mixed feelings about it, but I think standards are a good thing. I made sure I was on the committee that made up those standards and as it turned out, I was the ONLY person on it, so our district pacing guide is my pacing guide. Any one who complains gets the answer - next time, show up.

Teaching styles vary from teacher to teacher. Some people need order and control, some operate well in chaos (that's me). You'd probably like my class, I also let my students talk as part of the learning process. However, there are teachers who also do well in a more structured class and their students love them and thrive. There are also teachers who have no control and the few students learn there. "

pharper wrote on Jun 25, 2009 10:25 AM:

" Having teachers that have fun is great, Angelina, but you may come to find you didn't learn as much as you thought you did. Kids (and I'm no exception) often find themselves distracted by a "fun" teacher, but a couple years later, when they need the material again, they find that they don't know as much as they thought they did. This may or not be the case at Redwood; I didn't go there and don't know.

I think that fewer kids would need to go to summer school if they had more guidance and support throughout the school year. Rather than assigning one guidance counselor to hundreds of students, I think the money would be worth it to hire more guidance counselors, and even tutors in certain subjects, whose job would be to be available after school and during breaks to help kids who are struggling to pass a class.

That way, kids don't need to "waste" their summer going to school, and can get the credits done the first time they try to do so.

Go to greatschools.net, by the way. They show that in API ranking, Redwood Middle School is a 6 of 10 Statewide and a 5 of 10 compared to similar schools. Harvest was a 4 in both areas, Silverado was a 6 statewide and a 7 compared to other schools, and River was a 10 out of 10 statewide and a 7 out of compared schools.

Napa High was a 7 out of 10 statewide and 9 out of ten compared to similar schools. Vintage was a 7 of ten statewide, and 8 of ten compared to other schools. New Tech is a 9 of 10 statewide and a 10 of 10 compared to similar schools. "

pharper wrote on Jun 25, 2009 10:27 AM:

" It would seem to me, judging by the numbers, that New Tech and River are doing something right. Despite Angelina's earlier assertions that River School kids didn't know their stuff, test scores show otherwise.

I don't know any kids from New Tech who ever went to summer school. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jun 25, 2009 1:50 PM:

" Some kids are motivated by the joy of learning, I was.

But I wasn't always motivated to learn the stuff they were teaching that year in school, so my folks paid me to get good grades. Since I wanted to go to movies and events, I got good grades.

It also worked for my own kids.

Some do their jobs because they love what they do, but few would continue if they did not get paid.

Not all would stay for money, not all would leave without money.

But that is how this world is designed.

~Ruff "

anativenapkin wrote on Jun 25, 2009 7:09 PM:

" Lee- I just wanted to tell you that West Park School opens its library doors every Tuesday during the summer. Mrs. Moore brings goodies for the children and allows them to check out books. There is the Napa library that has its summer reading program, but West Park (like many other schools I am sure) have their own summer reading program and throw a party for the children at school that reach their goal of so many pages read during the summer. This is an example of teachers and staff that go out of their way to promote a positive and fun learning environment. Amazing stuff this! "

anativenapkin wrote on Jun 25, 2009 7:15 PM:

" Ruff~ I always saw friends that got paid for grades and couldn't figure the logic. It was just known that we (my sister and brothers) were expected to get good grades and we did. There were consequences for less than stellar grades, like the restriction from after school sports that we loved so much, but that rarely even came into play for any of us. Now I have 4 children of my own, and they are following suit. All four go to a private school and all four are on the honor roll. They love learning, and when they don't, they still work hard to bring home good marks. This is all without a payout. I may just be lucky :) "

Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jun 25, 2009 9:43 PM:

" teacher-
"I don't believe that someone as bright as you are is motivated by the thought of having a fancy car when they grow up."

So what your saying is that because I want a fast, beautiful car (or cars... I love around 200 of them) I'm not smart? I love cars, I love the speed, I love the POWER. I want that, and I know how to get it. It's not free either.

pharper-
You obviously haven't had my teachers.. it's one of those "you had to be there" things...

I didn't go to Harvest, you did. I'm not going to tell you if it's a good school or not, because I never went there so I don't know. You didn't go to River or Redwood. I did, so you shouldn't be telling me whether or not they're good schools. Experience SHOULD triumph over some text on a piece of paper... "

pharper wrote on Jun 25, 2009 11:58 PM:

" Angelina, one girl's experience does not a rating make. The numbers are not in your favor. They are in River School's. Frankly, I'm not surprised that Harvest had a low API; when I was there, I had a great time, but I don't feel like I learned much. Many of my teachers seemed more interesting in being well-liked than in teaching subject matter. Sure, that made them fun, but it didn't help me to learn.

You are using a logical fallacy. Your singular, isolated experience is not proper, appropriate, or logical basis for rating a school or determining how good it is. Evidence points to the opposite of your claim, and although I think you're intelligent and wouldn't lie about this, I'm more willing to trust test scores than a soon-to-be eighth-grader's personal experience.

I don't think that teacher insulted your intelligence at all (you may note that he called you bright). He was merely noting that it seems kind of weird that someone with your intelligence and obvious knack for learning would be motivated by something as material as a car. I like cars too, but I learn because life is more interesting that way, not because I expect a reward. One way of thinking isn't better than the other; I just think that teacher was surprised by yours. "

Jane Eyrehead wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:48 AM:

" To pharper--You may not know anyone from New Tech who went to summer school, but I taught quite a few of them who failed ninth grade English three years ago. Yes, it was a summer school class. Most of them had also failed ninth grade algebra, too. They appeared to have learned their lesson, for they did well in my class. As for the high rankings of NTHS and River School, it is not a surprise. These are schools with a self-selected student body. The comprehensive high schools (Napa and Vintage) have their own characters and a lot to offer. Many New Tech students take electives at Napa High, for example. Napa and Vintage also have honors and AP classes--the last time I checked, New Tech didn't. I think it is a little narrow to judge schools by one yardstick, test scores. I also think that it is a strength of the NVUSD that we have such a variety of schools, although all signs point to homogenization, I fear. "

pharper wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:00 PM:

" If it was three years ago and the subject was algebra, I know exactly why they had to be retaken, so I retract my earlier statement that I don't know any Tech students who needed summer school. When I was in ninth grade, we had a math teacher whose method of teaching was to tell students to "Google it." Most students in her classes failed them. A lot of students were severely set back by that math class.

I understand completely that having a self-selected student body does make River and New Tech more likely to succeed. However, my main point was to say that Angelina had earlier been claiming that students in her class at River didn't know her stuff, whereas students at Redwood did, and test scores would say that such a thing is not true in the least.

I'd even venture to say that New Tech is better than its scores suggest, and you're absolutely right not to judge solely on test scores. But they exist for a reason, and in using them I can give comprehensive proof of the areas in which a school struggles or succeeds.

Thank you for pointing that out, though. I'd completely forgotten. :) "

pharper wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:09 PM:

" I forgot to add that no, New Tech does not offer AP or Honors classes, but ALL students are required to complete at least 12 college credits in order to graduate, which does add points to a GPA and which colleges look upon favorably. I know many students who even got up to a year and a half or more of their general education for college done while at New Tech, and were I an admissions officer, that would be more attractive to me than a few AP classes.

As well, New Tech students are required to do 20 hours of community service, a 50 hour internship, a professional portfolio, and now (as of two years ago, I believe) complete 10 hours of school service. "

winemd wrote on Jun 26, 2009 2:02 PM:

" Some of this conversation reminds me of a Calvin and Hobbes cartoon, where Calvin's father points out that he loves to learn, and "has read just about every dinosaur book ever written". He then asks, "So why aren't you doing better in school?" to which Calvin replies, "We don't read about dinosaurs".

And I want to say that I am glad that we have a lot of different schools in Napa, because students are different, and there is no one school that would work the best for everyone. My two children probably would have done better in different schools. The younger one does fine in the school that I chose for the older one, but I requested a different one for him and he didn't get in. I think River would be a good fit for my daughter, but not my son, based on the programs I have seen (I have not visited Redwood, because we live in southeast Napa). I am glad that test score results are available for us as parents to review, as one of a number of tools, but I tend to look at progress over time not the numbers for any given year. And nothing beats visiting the campuses, and meeting teachers/students. And at this stage, taking into account the child's friends and preferences as well. "

Jane Eyrehead wrote on Jun 26, 2009 4:03 PM:

" Thanks for the polite response, pharper!

I don't teach summer school for the reasons that C. Burns cites. In the old days, bad behavior would get a student tossed--now the ADA $$$ (average daily attendance money) can't be lost. (I am a flexible person, but I don't hold with gangster/hooker attire in school, and that was being tolerated by summer school administration.) I do like the idea of STUDENTS being held accountable for their learning. Teachers can only do so much--ideally, it is a partnership wth the teacher, the parents, and the student. It is unfortunate that summer school is all remedial, because a few enrichment classes would leaven the sulky atmosphere--and probably enlighten some of those very kids who fail. However, few districts can afford that these days. "

a teacher wrote on Jun 26, 2009 7:05 PM:

" Jane Eyrehead-I am happy to report that so far my administrators have been good for their word and our summer school has run very well. I actually enjoyed the first week.

I don't understand the fixation on remediation during the summer. In my experience classes start off over crowded but end up way below a profitable size before the session is half way done. It seems to me that classes students WANT to attend would stay full. I take it from conversations with my bosses that remediation is all the state is willing to pay for. Pitty... "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy