St. Helena mayor wants public vote on Wine Train
Dispute over how it can help town
By JESSE DUARTE
For the Register
October 31st, 2009
October 26th, 2009
October 21st, 2009
October 5th, 2009
October 4th, 2009
Détente has been declared between St. Helena and the Napa Valley Wine Train, but Mayor Del Britton isn’t so sure that St. Helena citizens are ready to lay down their arms.
On Tuesday, the City Council rejected Britton’s proposal that St. Helenans vote on whether the Napa Valley Wine Train should drop off passengers in the city.
Britton, the only staunch opponent of the Wine Train on the council, said St. Helena voters should be asked a simple question on their November 2010 ballot: “Do you want the city to allow the Wine Train to discharge passengers in St. Helena?”
But other councilmembers agreed that any talk of a ballot initiative is premature until the Wine Train’s trial period has ended.
In June, the council agreed to allow the Wine Train to disembark up to 50 passengers during the next couple of Cheers! St. Helena events. At the end of October, the council will consider how things have gone and decide whether to allow more frequent stops.
The Wine Train made its first stop during the July 3 Cheers! event.
Britton has criticized the trial run, saying there’s no clear criteria with which to evaluate the Wine Train’s impact on the city.
“I’m getting a lot of feedback from people who are not happy about the fact that we’re doing this,” Britton said.
“Everybody I talk to loves it, Del,” Councilwoman Bonnie Schoch responded. “Everybody you talk to hates it.”
Councilwoman Catarina Sanchez seconded Britton’s motion to put the issue on the ballot, but the rest of the council voted against it.
“There’s no need to try to fracture the community over this right now,” Crull said.
However, Councilman Eric Sklar said he might be willing to consider the idea once the current trial period is over. Since the city can’t formally place an initiative on the ballot until 2010 anyway, the council should reconsider the matter next year, he said.
Councilmembers Schoch and Sharon Crull said the Wine Train issue doesn’t necessarily boil down to a yes/no question. Crull argued that many former opponents of the Wine Train now support the limited stops.
Sklar said the original dispute between St. Helena and the Wine Train “wasn’t about whether the Wine Train let people off or not. The issue was whether we controlled and had a say in how many. We have that control now.”
He also pointed out that no members of the public have come to council meetings to speak against the Wine Train’s trail period.
Britton suggested that the outcome of the 2008 election, in which he beat Schoch for the mayor’s seat, was an indication that voters oppose the disembarking of Wine Train passengers.
Schoch didn’t think their differing views on the Wine Train were the key factor in the election results, saying that their stances on growth were a crucial issue.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
MarkMiwords wrote on Jul 19, 2009 8:58 AM:
bdbinanique wrote on Jul 19, 2009 9:08 AM:
Normbc9 wrote on Jul 19, 2009 9:12 AM:
whyn? wrote on Jul 19, 2009 11:43 AM:
LOLA wrote on Jul 19, 2009 2:13 PM:
reneefannin wrote on Jul 19, 2009 2:55 PM:
I understand that Britton doesn't want it, but want is it that he doesn't want?
Maybe I have missed something. I live in Yountville and wish that we could ride the train up to St Helena and down to Napa to enjoy a meal with wine and not have to drive my car.
It would cut down on traffic and still allow people to enjoy the city. How will it create more traffic and cause diversion of traffic into the neighborhoods?
I suppose the people could vote on it. They voted on my marriage and this seems like an issue that would affect them far more than that does;-)
Can anyone clearly articulate the issue? I really would like to better understand. "
MarkMiwords wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:22 PM:
reader wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:27 PM:
reader wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:30 PM:
bennyd wrote on Jul 19, 2009 5:58 PM:
charliesheen wrote on Jul 19, 2009 9:02 PM:
UpValleyReader wrote on Jul 19, 2009 9:21 PM:
It would be different if St. Helena tried to contain the tourism to non-traffic areas and prosecuted jaywalking. Too bad the police are afraid of the rich business owners. "
Dblue34 wrote on Jul 20, 2009 12:23 AM:
reneefannin wrote on Jul 20, 2009 8:57 AM:
Can someone do that? "