NVR Logo
St. Helena mayor wants public vote on Wine Train
Dispute over how it can help town
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Save and Share Share
Détente has been declared between St. Helena and the Napa Valley Wine Train, but Mayor Del Britton isn’t so sure that St. Helena citizens are ready to lay down their arms.

On Tuesday, the City Council  rejected Britton’s proposal that St. Helenans vote on whether the Napa Valley Wine Train should drop off passengers in the city.
Britton, the only staunch opponent of the Wine Train on the council, said St. Helena voters should be asked a simple question on their November 2010 ballot: “Do you want the city to allow the Wine Train to discharge passengers in St. Helena?”

But other councilmembers agreed that any talk of a ballot initiative is premature until the Wine Train’s trial period has ended.
In June, the council agreed to allow the Wine Train to disembark up to 50 passengers during the next couple of Cheers! St. Helena events. At the end of October, the council will consider how things have gone and decide whether to allow more frequent stops.

The Wine Train made its first stop during the July 3 Cheers! event.
Britton has criticized the trial run, saying there’s no clear criteria with which to evaluate the Wine Train’s impact on the city.

“I’m getting a lot of feedback from people who are not happy about the fact that we’re doing this,”  Britton said.

“Everybody I talk to loves it, Del,” Councilwoman Bonnie Schoch responded. “Everybody you talk to hates it.”

Councilwoman Catarina Sanchez seconded Britton’s motion to put the issue on the ballot, but the rest of the council voted against it.

“There’s no need to try to fracture the community over this right now,” Crull said.

However, Councilman Eric Sklar said he might be willing to consider the idea once the current trial period is over. Since the city can’t formally place an initiative on the ballot until 2010 anyway, the council should reconsider the matter next year, he said.

Councilmembers Schoch and Sharon Crull said the Wine Train issue doesn’t necessarily boil down to a yes/no question. Crull argued that many former opponents of the Wine Train now support the limited stops.

Sklar said the original dispute between St. Helena and the Wine Train “wasn’t about whether the Wine Train let people off or not. The issue was whether we controlled and had a say in how many. We have that control now.”

He also pointed out that no members of the public have come to council meetings to speak against the Wine Train’s trail period.

Britton suggested that the outcome of the 2008 election, in which he beat Schoch for the mayor’s seat, was an indication that voters oppose the disembarking of Wine Train passengers.

Schoch didn’t think their differing views on the Wine Train were the key factor in the election results, saying that their stances on growth were a crucial issue.
14 comment(s)

MarkMiwords wrote on Jul 19, 2009 8:58 AM:

" The mayor can frequently be extremely arrogant and rude towards his constituents, so as a policy, I usually never support him. But on this issue he is right. Dumping thousands of passengers a month on our tiny two blocks of Main Street will be a financial boom for the Main Street merchants, but I remind you that most of those merchants do not live in St. Helena. Those thousands of people will be a nightmare for the people who do live here and for anyone trying to drive through Main Street's Hwy. 29. Traffic will simply end up being diverted into the neighborhoods in an attempt to avoid all the congestion. On this issue, as on many others, the city council is totally out of touch with what the townsfolk really want. It appears that they have been swayed by pressure of those who wish to capitalize on the town's uniqueness. But once again, the pressure is being applied by those who do not live here. PUT IT ON THE BALLOT. Only St. Helena residents will be able to vote and the townsfolk's true wishes will be revealed. "

bdbinanique wrote on Jul 19, 2009 9:08 AM:

" Hey if the Mayor doesn't want to let the Wine train stop,then oh well maybe the train could stop in Yountville and let the Wine Train guests spend their money there instead.Part of being a business in a community is to help the community,and that is what the train is trying to do with all of the cities in our valley.I work for the train and what a blessing it is,we have good wage great benefits and a boss who really cares about not just his employees but about our community.And by the way Cheers! was great can't wait to do it again. I had a great time in St. Helena and a great worry free train ride. "

Normbc9 wrote on Jul 19, 2009 9:12 AM:

" When the time is right I'd sure love to allow this question to appear on a formal ballot. I think the mayor will find out that he is out of touch with both the residential and business communities in his city. The idea Ron Sculatti had was a good one. Lets give it a fair try and then make some decisions. "

whyn? wrote on Jul 19, 2009 11:43 AM:

" Isn't it better to have wine impaired drivers use the train than traverse the two corridors of the valley? Why wouldn't St. Helena want the business? There is something wrong with this picture. "

LOLA wrote on Jul 19, 2009 2:13 PM:

" Am I to understand with downtown Napa having trouble getting people to shop and/or dine there, the Wine Train is going to take train loads of shoppers - and probably eaters- to St. Helena so they can help St. Helena's economy? This might be good for the Wine Train and St. Helena Merchants but in the long run, terrible for the City of Napa. If I had a hotel or lodging in the City of Napa I certainly wouldn't be steering people to the Wine Train! "

reneefannin wrote on Jul 19, 2009 2:55 PM:

" I really don't get the issue.

I understand that Britton doesn't want it, but want is it that he doesn't want?

Maybe I have missed something. I live in Yountville and wish that we could ride the train up to St Helena and down to Napa to enjoy a meal with wine and not have to drive my car.

It would cut down on traffic and still allow people to enjoy the city. How will it create more traffic and cause diversion of traffic into the neighborhoods?

I suppose the people could vote on it. They voted on my marriage and this seems like an issue that would affect them far more than that does;-)

Can anyone clearly articulate the issue? I really would like to better understand. "

MarkMiwords wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:22 PM:

" Normbc9: Ron S. is a great guy, and he has a lot of terrific ideas. But once again I remind you, that he no longer lives in St. Helena. He isn't going to have to deal with the mess that this all could turn into. "

reader wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:27 PM:

" Take the tracks all the way to Calistoga. Drop folks off in Yountville and Calistoga. Calistoga will welcome the train with open arms. "

reader wrote on Jul 19, 2009 4:30 PM:

" To the opponents in St. Helena: You live in one of the most famous tourist towns in the country so you didn't move there for its peace. If you want peace, move to remote, rural Angwin. "

bennyd wrote on Jul 19, 2009 5:58 PM:

" If The mayor of St. Helena wants to curb tax revenue that comes from the businesses in St Helena, then maybe he can convince the homeowners to pay for all the services St. Helena needs. It’s mind boggling that in this day and age, elected officials do not understand basic economic realities. I guess he would rather send local business tax revenue elsewhere. "

charliesheen wrote on Jul 19, 2009 9:02 PM:

" This city is far from short on operating funds. If there are budget issues they stem from spending, not revenues. St. Helena must resist the temptation to prop up sagging sales tax revenues by rolling over to the t-shirt and art gallery crowd. "

UpValleyReader wrote on Jul 19, 2009 9:21 PM:

" Del Britton is right to ask for a vote, but it is a shame it will only be St. Helena folks who decide. My commute (and the cost for gas) doubled because of the slowing and congestion through the main thoroughfare I have to take home. I could drive like a maniac through people's neighborhoods but that is incredibly rude, and I would still have to dodge drunken tourists.

It would be different if St. Helena tried to contain the tourism to non-traffic areas and prosecuted jaywalking. Too bad the police are afraid of the rich business owners. "

Dblue34 wrote on Jul 20, 2009 12:23 AM:

" Are you people for real. A train CAUSING traffic...Thousands of people on a train that holds 100...Why don't you get out of your SUV and check out what color the sky is in our world. CARS cause traffic, not pedestrians. Pedestrians spend money and generat tax revenue, whether or not the merchants live in YOUR town is irrelevant. The tax is collected. They don't take it home with them. Save your local attitude, your tax revenue without tourism would leave St. Helena with one blinking red light, and dirt roads. Try selling millions of cases (and dollars) of wine to locals and see where you get. Get out of the stone age. Tourism is the biggest revenue generator in the valley, shoo them off and watch the value of the overpriced home you own drop like a rock cavemen! "

reneefannin wrote on Jul 20, 2009 8:57 AM:

" I would still like to hear someone articulate the issue with having the wine train stop there. There are clearly people who oppose it, but no one has explained exactly why.

Can someone do that? "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy