NVR Logo
Upvalley group ponders expansion of health tourism
Sunday, August 02, 2009
Save and Share Share
St. Helena’s economy has survived, if not thrived, during the recent economic downturn. But what should be done to keep it healthy for the next 20 years?

That’s one of the key questions addressed in a report by the Economic Outlook Study Group, a committee of a dozen business representatives, citizens and city officials formed in May at the request of St. Helena Mayor Del Britton.
“Our job was to think about the economic situation in St. Helena and think about what we might do to make St. Helena’s economy sustainable in the future,” group member Dave Brotemarkle told the city’s General Plan Update Steering Committee on July 22.

The study group identified St. Helena’s dominant industries as wine, tourism, and various retail and other businesses. But it concludes that there’s also potential for a fourth major industry sector, broadly defined as “health and wellness, fitness, research, education and health care.”
The report argues that making St. Helena a health destination would be compatible with the wine industry and would attract a similar demographic. Plus St. Helena already has the infrastructure for such an industry, with businesses such as the Culinary Institute of America, St. Helena Hospital, the Napa Valley College Upvalley campus and Health Spa Napa Valley.

“Quality of life lessons emphasizing health, wellness and fitness in our beautiful valley will harmoniously attract more low-impact, high-dollar visitors, and be good for our residents,” said Brotemarkle, who proposed the motto “St. Helena is good for your health.”
The entire study group attended the last week’s general plan meeting because the committee was scheduled to tackle the “Economic Stability” element of the new general plan. But Brotemarkle, the study group’s spokesman, didn’t get a chance to summarize the report until after the committee had finished discussing the general plan’s economic policies.

Senior Planner Greg Desmond, the city staffer in charge of the general plan update, said there’s still plenty of time for people to provide input. “There’s time to comment now and up until Nov. 15,” he said.

Members of the Economic Outlook Study Group were interviewed as stakeholders as the draft economic element was being put together, Desmond added. “So a lot of what they proposed is in the draft element already,” he said.

The report has already won the full endorsement of the St. Helena Chamber of Commerce’s board of directors. A full presentation of the report and its recommendations is scheduled for the Aug. 25 City Council meeting.

The report includes a few broad recommendations: keep the wine business in focus, invest in infrastructure improvement, improve St. Helena as a destination, revisit downtown retail/commercial policies, explore the possibility of promoting new industry and continue to focus on economic sustainability.

The report points out that the costs of necessary infrastructure improvements exceed city revenues. One of the solutions, the report states, is to boost revenues by easing restrictions on businesses. Formula business restrictions, hotel room caps, restaurant seat caps and parking restrictions hamper businesses that drive the city’s economy and generate revenue for costly infrastructure projects, the study group concluded.

“We think the city needs to transition from being a gatekeeper to being a proactive partner in our town’s future economic sustainability,” said Brotemarkle.

The report looks at St. Helena’s revenue sources, relative to comparable cities like Calistoga and Yountville. It observes that St. Helena gets just 17 percent of its revenue from transient occupancy taxes (TOT), compared with 59 percent in Yountville and 48 percent in Calistoga.

Compared with those cities, St. Helena receives a relatively large portion of its revenue — roughly 30 percent — from sales taxes. The top generators of sales tax revenue are food products, including restaurants (41 percent), retail building materials (21 percent), general retail (18 percent), and transportation (13 percent).
3 comment(s)

bennyd wrote on Aug 2, 2009 10:43 AM:

" Long term economic sustainability has to involve a well designed transit system. The young and progressive “Eco-tourist” not only demand quality and health related products and services, but also enjoy traveling to destinations that are easy to get to from major cities, and also are environmentally friendly.

The Wine Train has been pro-active in participating in a service that can some day be a world class transportation alternative that will benefit all of the Napa Valley.

This transit system, in conjunction with the proposed bike path through out the Napa Valley, will be a very popular world destination for those younger tourists that would rather enjoy a destination, than be stuck in traffic. "

reason-ator wrote on Aug 2, 2009 12:27 PM:

" bennyd, you should work for the Wine Train.

No way I could have come up with that spin. Very good.

All the Wine Train will need is some train tracks that allow speeds of more than 15mph, a few more trains, and a bunch more customers with a different mindset than today's typical tourist. I hope it works, but it's a big job. It's gonna cost a lot of money with a very low return. And if the government was going to help fund a task of such proportions, the protests will be loud and numerous. Not to mention the fact that some governments in Napa Canyon aren't too keen on the Wine Train. "

steph wrote on Aug 2, 2009 1:05 PM:

" Yes, I think the upvalley group should ponder letting tourists off the Wine Train. Seems obvious to me. I'm not sad for a town that has huge amounts of wealth and shoots itself in the foot like it does in an amusing case of ill-thought snobbery. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy