NVR Logo
'We are full': The campus crush
Canyon Oaks Principal Maren Rocca Hunt, left, greets parents whose children have been reassigned to Donaldson Way Elementary School. | Buy photos
Canyon Oaks overflowing, other American Canyon schools filled to capacity
Monday, August 24, 2009
Save and Share Share
Students carrying backpacks filled with school supplies returned in droves to school on Wednesday, the first day of the 2009-10 school year.

So much so that about 70 students who live in the Canyon Oaks Elementary School area east of Highway 29 will attend Donaldson Way Elementary School, said Canyon Oaks Principal Maren Rocca Hunt Wednesday. As she directed traffic in the parking lot, Rocca Hunt said the K-5 school is starting the school year with 630 students.
“We are full,” she said.

None of the 70 students transferred to Donaldson Way Elementary School were able to return to Canyon Oaks Elementary as of Friday, according to the schools.
One reason for the high number of new students is that families are doubling up in many American Canyon homes, a sign of hard economic times, Rocca Hunt said. At the same time, she added, home construction continues on the east side of town.

Eight-year-old Vince Dionsio was among the students reassigned from Canyon Oaks to Donaldson Way Elementary School Wednesday.
His mother, Nina Dionisio, said the family moved to American Canyon in June, and that they were looking forward to sending Vince to the neighborhood campus. It was only on Wednesday that they found out he’ll be going to Donaldson Way Elementary, more than a mile away and on the other side of busy Highway 29.

“It’s OK,” said Nina, as she, her husband and Vince returned to their car to drive to Donaldson Way Elementary School Wednesday. “We’ll see.”

As the Dionisios left, other students and their parents headed toward the front gate and the beginning of life at Canyon Oaks Elementary School.

“I’m nervous because this is my first year here,” said 10-year-old Jose Prieto, a fifth-grader who recently moved from Sacramento. A younger brother will attend Donaldson Way because there was no room at Canyon Oaks Elementary School, his stepmother said.

“We’re hoping for a transfer sometime soon,” said Angelico Prieto, Jose’s stepmother, whose daughter, Angelina, 7, and a nephew, Jesse Prebble, 10, also attend Canyon Oaks Elementary School.

Nearby, Gurjot Bhatti, 7, a second-grader at Canyon Oaks, waited silently for the front gate to open with his mom, Upninder.

“(I’m) fine,” Gurjot said quietly as his mother carried a ream of copy paper for the school.

With budget cuts already affecting schools and more cuts to come later this year, Rocca Hunt expects to have to review her school budget every quarter.

She predicted Canyon Oaks may not be able to buy such items as new computer programs. “People will see it in the classroom,” Rocca Hunt said.

While in past years the students turned away from Canyon Oaks Elementary School were sent to either Donaldson Way or Napa Junction Elementary School, this year Donaldson Way will absorb the overflow by itself.

As of Friday, Donaldson Way Elementary School had about 570 K-5 students.

On Monday, Dee McFarland, principal at Napa Junction Elementary School, said she expected 450 students, including about 30 elementary school-age students with disabilities.

American Canyon Middle School is also expected to be full this year. As of Friday, the school had 872 students — about 50 more than last year.

“We’re bursting at the seams,” Principal Dan Scudero said in his office Monday.
16 comment(s)

noblindershere wrote on Aug 24, 2009 6:48 AM:

" When developers build new developments, is there not a per capita ratio set up that requires them to build a new school after building so many houses? How many children are accounted for when building a new home, 2?It appears that the mulitple families living in houses is also quite an issue.
600 for an elementary school is doable,but over that is a bit much. "

Paddy wrote on Aug 24, 2009 7:16 AM:

" Did anyone think of having the developers, who have slammed amcan with hundreds of new homes, build enough schools to handle this many kids? Don't even think of expecting taxpayers to foot the bill. Let those who have made millions of dollars on these developments pay for any new school as well as the bill for the new dam they want to build for additional water.

It's time to understand we don't have the resources, prisons, schools, infrastructure to continue to build as if it was 1909. "

Paddy wrote on Aug 24, 2009 7:18 AM:

" NVR states: "One reason for the high number of new students is that families are doubling up in many American Canyon homes..."

Aren't these single family dwellings? Isn't there a law or zoning ordinance against this? "

Margo wrote on Aug 24, 2009 7:27 AM:

" Now add in all the Vallejo peeps who think they can lie their way into our schools. I know DW has already kicked out a few students who do not belong. "

car2007 wrote on Aug 24, 2009 7:31 AM:

" noblindershere, I think the big issue here is multiple families living in a single house. There should be a rule where only the children of the home owners would be able to attend canyon oaks elementary, the other children in the home should be transfer to the other elementary on the other side of the hwy. "

freshair wrote on Aug 24, 2009 9:55 AM:

" The contrasting quality of schools districts between Vallejo and American Canyon make the AmCan schools too attractive and many skirt the rules and try and claim residency through multiply occupancy in the homes.

Unfortunately, the district is going to have to set up strict standards to validate the residency for these students. Imaging what a problem it will be when the High School opens. "

Lexme2 wrote on Aug 24, 2009 11:44 AM:

" In previous years AmCan police have actually gone to students houses to confirm they live there. I assume this will continue when the high school opens. "

cheezcakemaker wrote on Aug 24, 2009 12:08 PM:

" This is alarming. I would imagine that there are numerous students from Vallejo lying into the Napa county district to avoid Vallejo schools. Maybe we should just give Am Can to Vallejo and redraw the county line... "

noblindershere wrote on Aug 24, 2009 12:41 PM:

" when you sign your child up for school you have to show bills in your name. So, they are not just living in the homes they are paying bills too. How would you then police who is the actual tennant or home owner? This needs to get resolved before the high school opens next Fall. I guess we will be able to track the numbers we have now and how it changes a bit better. Kids have always claimed uncle or aunts address in AC if they live in Vallejo for years. "

why wrote on Aug 24, 2009 2:10 PM:

" The no child left behind law also has a large effect on this as well. Whether you are here legally or not you still have a right to an education. I see it all the time in Napa with kids saying they are living in a certain area just so they can go to the highschool they would like. Napa Faces the same issuw. "

mominapa wrote on Aug 24, 2009 2:29 PM:

" Car2007, you are assuming that all Am Can homes are owned by the people living in them, then they invite other families to live there too. What about several families living in the home of a renter? How then do you decide where the children attend school. We all know our population is growing by leaps and bounds and that Vallejo schools are not as "up to par" as Napa schools. Any parent would rather send their child to a better school. Why not improve Vallejo schools. Why not improve all of California's schools so that this situation does not exist? California schools suffer greatly when compared to the schools in other states. Even Missouri and Arkansas have better scholastic standing than California. Find the problem and fix it. "

TomcatMojoMom wrote on Aug 24, 2009 4:40 PM:

" When I was filling out paperwork this year for Donaldson Way emergency info, etc, there was a sheet asking what type of dwelling the child lives in and it listed several options for you to check. These options included motel, car, shelter, not sure, and a few others. It made me think they weren't being too picky. "

Cadence wrote on Aug 24, 2009 6:18 PM:

" Well, no one said high density housing was perfect, did they? "

meanaznmom wrote on Aug 24, 2009 8:42 PM:

" The problem is that we force kids that do not want to go to school and parents that don't care about their child's education attend school. Put only the kids and parents that emphasize education and want to learn in school. Stop the schools from policing and start having the schools teach. "

savenapa wrote on Aug 24, 2009 10:34 PM:

" The problem is that a "single family residence" and the zoning allocation for it, is based on American suppositions and guidelines. Since we now hold other "cultures" above our own, we find that 20 people in a household is not the exception but the norm. Perhaps we now need to update our occupancy expectations to align with the culture that we have pandered to and plan accordingly. "

meanaznmom wrote on Aug 24, 2009 11:51 PM:

" Families are not choosing to share a "single family residence" because they have an abundance of money and are trying to get rich. People are not choosing to live in shelters, motels or their cars. Hard economic times have forced many people in these situations. It is not a nationality "culture" but an American economic culture. Families with financial hardships often press upon education because they want to ensure their children are not in the same position. I would rather my children go to school with poor kids that have strong educational support than a rich kid in a single family home, neglected by their parents and not supported educationally. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy