Highlands residents vote again on rate hikes
By KERANA TODOROV
Register Staff Writer
October 5th, 2009
September 18th, 2009
September 17th, 2009
September 13th, 2009
September 12th, 2009
November 24th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 13th, 2009
November 12th, 2009
Berryessa Highlands’ water and sewer rates will increase on Oct. 1 — unless a majority of residents opposes the proposed hikes once again.
In June, property owners in the Napa Berryessa Resort Improvement District defeated a rate hike, saying the fees — which would have permanently increased rates by more than 103 percent, according to the residents — were too high.
A citizens’ committee came up with the latest proposal to help fund operations and maintenance of the district’s aging water and sewer systems.
It calls for a hike of:
• 82 percent between Oct. 1 and June 30, 2010;
• 61 percent between July 1, 2010 and June 30, 2011.
Then the rates will start to decrease to their current levels beginning July 1, 2011.
People now pay on average $1,182 a year for water and sewer services, according to Napa County officials who manage the district.
“Nobody is happy with the rate increases, but they all understand this has to be done,” Bart Barthelemy, a committee member, said Thursday.
Under Proposition 218, a state law that allows citizens to weigh in on water and sewer hikes, residents have until Sept. 29 to protest the latest proposal.
The Napa County Board of Supervisors serves as the resort district board, and board chairman Mark Luce said the district will make do with the rates the residents support. The district’s priority is to operate safely, he said.
“We’ll stretch it as we can,” Luce said.
Projected expenses for upgrades are $900,000.
After the June vote, according to Barthelemy, residents spent more than 300 hours reviewing the water and sewer rates in order to come up with the two-year plan.
The latest proposal should bring in enough money to run the district, Barthelemy said — if district officials agree to make operational changes, including hiring an outside firm to manage the systems more effectively.
To come up with the newest proposal, the citizens’ committee took into consideration that the district’s biggest single user, Steele Park Resort, is shutting down later this year. Steele Park’s contributions totaled about 40 percent of the small district’s annual income.
The park, which remains open on a limited basis for boat launching and RV users, is scheduled to close in October while the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the federal agency that manages Lake Berryessa, selects a new concessionaire. It is still unknown who will operate Steele Park Resort.
Pete Lucero, a spokesman for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, said on Thursday the Bureau will accept bids through Sept. 30.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
yessam99 wrote on Sep 4, 2009 8:03 AM:
wb5218 wrote on Sep 4, 2009 8:56 AM:
What would help these people? Our neighbors?
We should all be finding a way to help these people in our County.
Napans for Napans right?
If my quick math on $100 is correct...
an additional 82% would be $182 then the 61% would take that to $293?
but I have read that bills could be $600 to $800!
I wonder what the real cost would be?
Anyone?
I would not blame the people, or those who have approved the project in the 60's.
The rate hikes would be ridiculous.
Where are the agriculture tax dollars to save us?
Or is this a them scenario?
Wasn't there an offer from a local group to help that was blasted?
No Ted Kennnedy's in Napa Representation...nobody seems to be able to reach across the table for the little guy. "
calisa wrote on Sep 4, 2009 8:39 PM:
Landshark wrote on Sep 4, 2009 9:16 PM:
“In 2000, the Bureau of Reclamation began planning for the Lake Berryessa area to determine the type and level of facilities and services needed for future long-term recreation operations. Some of the issues that were addressed included:”
• Day use needs
• Marina development
• Long-and short-term RV and trailer sites
• Changes to concessionaire operations
• Overnight lodging facilities and camping needs
Tens of thousands of hard working people had invested in the recreation industry based at Lake Berryessa and today September 4, 2009, the beginning of Labor Day weekend and in the tenth year of Reclamation’s plan, is a distasteful landscape.
At a period when families could spend time at the various resorts enjoying water-sports, end of summer celebrations, small venues with a live band and overall relaxation we have two resorts providing limited resources and overpriced houseboats. NVR reported that Steele Park is providing boat launch however the raving fans are long gone.
The NVR has failed to provide in depth reporting and accountability. Reclamation is on their second round of their Prospectus (RFP), with limited interest, no financial support and local communities that relay on the income generated from resorts to maintain water & sewage facilities.
With respect to recreation it is my opinion that the Bureau of Reclamation is providing failure & devastation, west of the Mississippi with no accountabilty. "
notwhatyouthink wrote on Sep 9, 2009 11:36 AM: