The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Froggie1559 wrote on Sep 4, 2009 5:23 PM:
jmo wrote on Sep 4, 2009 6:42 PM:
Nope don't recognize any names.
There are a disproportionate number of Hispanic names...what gives???? "
SouthNapa wrote on Sep 4, 2009 7:41 PM:
Manxkat wrote on Sep 4, 2009 9:06 PM:
martini wrote on Sep 5, 2009 8:38 AM:
paranoidinthetrees wrote on Sep 5, 2009 9:05 AM:
mypoint wrote on Sep 5, 2009 11:32 AM:
anothervoice wrote on Sep 5, 2009 1:09 PM:
backtoNapa wrote on Sep 7, 2009 8:43 AM:
Froggie1559 wrote on Sep 7, 2009 12:19 PM:
jmo wrote on Sep 7, 2009 4:21 PM:
funnyme wrote on Sep 7, 2009 5:19 PM:
What do you mean?
jmo,
Careful, I was given a warning to get banned from the site a few months back...even though your remarks seem very logical, now I am 'forced' to look the other way :)
I love statistics! "
Bianco55 wrote on Sep 8, 2009 3:27 AM:
I wonder if those people who got arrested wished now that they spent 5% of their fine on a Taxi or shoot, even have spent 1/2 of their fine and taken a nice limo instead of getting their car towed.
Come on people, think before you drink. "
KK wrote on Sep 8, 2009 11:14 AM:
Froggie1559 wrote on Sep 9, 2009 10:02 AM:
realitybites wrote on Sep 9, 2009 11:33 AM:
Froggie1559 wrote on Sep 9, 2009 12:00 PM:
realitybites wrote on Sep 9, 2009 1:20 PM:
Benjamin Franklin
Punish those who actually inflict injury - Speeders, texters, cell callers, stop light runners are just as responsible for accidents as someone who gets caught in the cash cow DUI laws. "
napabicycler wrote on Sep 9, 2009 3:28 PM:
reason-ator wrote on Sep 10, 2009 12:25 PM:
realitybites, you can't talk sense into some of the gossips who hang on the internet waiting for the list to come out so that they can find more people to gossip about behind their back. In fact, if you dare make Edith and Mabel get concerned that they may lose their gossip material, they will come here and talk about you instead. They loves their gossip, and they like it because it makes them feel superior to real people.
KK, I'm sorry for your situation. Even though you did nothing wrong at all, the NVR has decided you must suffer. And it is doing nobody ( other than Edith and Mabel ) any good. The NVR comes out looking cheap and petty, but Edith and Mabel support them and that makes them feel good. Actually, it's funny how many people you can get to laugh at the NVR. I didn't realize it until they started this feature.
I remember when the NVR was a decent paper, and I wonder if they can ever get back to there. Trodding over innocent people and hurting other innocent people is becoming commonplace now. Their lack of compassion is a big turn-off. "
Froggie1559 wrote on Sep 10, 2009 5:17 PM:
Napa_Citizen wrote on Sep 12, 2009 8:02 AM:
Im glad the NV Register prints this list. I think a little public humiliation is a good preventative for you to NOT drink & drive in Napa County. (Unless you want to risk getting caught and have your name published in the paper!)
Don't like it? MOVE "
me2you wrote on Sep 12, 2009 2:01 PM:
anothervoice wrote on Sep 13, 2009 3:07 PM:
realitybites wrote on Sep 15, 2009 2:55 PM:
Personal vengence is no excuse for public humiliation. Those without sin cast the first stone. What blogger here hasn't sped, talked on a cell phone, texted while driving, made an illegal lane change or rolled through a stop sign. So that we can all be safer - why don't you voluntarily print your names in the paper every month so we can stop frequenting your business and look upon you with disfavor.
While your at it, let's also print the name of all the "witches" so we can start a witch hunt . . . and the mob says baaaaaaaaaaa. "
KK wrote on Sep 16, 2009 9:21 AM:
I mentioned earlier in the comments section that someone in Napa has the same name as myself, and she is on this list.
What's the point of this list Register? I can only imagine how many other people think it's me on this list. "
napagirl76 wrote on Sep 16, 2009 10:18 AM:
if you dont want your name on the list DONT DRINK AND DRIVE! it only takes doing one time to kill someone.
second- if you dont like that the list is in the paper DONT READ IT!
and if you have the same name as someone and people start asking about it make into a joke and have some fun with it i did! I told them i had been out hitting up all of napas hot spots (haha) then stole a car and lead the police on county wide chase it made everyone laugh and they got the point that it wasnt me :) "
realitybites wrote on Sep 16, 2009 11:57 AM:
reason-ator wrote on Sep 16, 2009 2:50 PM:
But they can make it pretty obvious sometimes. They do it all the time, but they don't like anybody ELSE to point it out.
This list is the biggest reason I can't take the NVR as serious journalism. And I know I'm not alone. "
checkyourself wrote on Sep 16, 2009 9:28 PM:
winewoman wrote on Sep 17, 2009 10:23 AM:
These aren't statistics. They are numbers. Actual statistics might be useful, instead of listing names for the sole purpose of gossip and scolding.
How about real statistics, like:
% this year to last year
% this month to last month
% by demographic
% by age
% local versus non local
% change
% first time offense, second offense. etc
seasonality trends
Merely listing names does not promote change. We need to identify the contributing factors and address those. Provide real statistics NVR and perhaps the public might offer up solutions, rather than tongue wagging, snickering and gossip. "
onethought wrote on Sep 17, 2009 10:55 AM:
tsgets wrote on Sep 18, 2009 8:10 AM:
TRUCKinDONUTS wrote on Sep 18, 2009 12:24 PM:
i understand and support the efforts by the police to keep these potentially dangerous people off the road. but is it necessary to post them up on a paper pedestal? they already have court and fines why make it a public matter? "
victoria911 wrote on Sep 24, 2009 7:34 AM:
jmo wrote on Sep 28, 2009 10:17 AM:
h3ath3rj wrote on Sep 28, 2009 3:21 PM:
Although drinking and driving is a problem in our community I would love to hear about some of the reduction in crim such as thefrt , secual assoult casses saulved ect..... "
keep it real wrote on Oct 4, 2009 1:03 PM:
reason-ator wrote on Oct 5, 2009 12:20 PM:
DUI may or may not be a victim-less crime. But innocent people whose names appear on this list do not deserve to have Mabel and Edith giggling about them.
What's truly sad is seeing how so many people are so mean-spirited that they enjoy seeing that other people are suffering difficulty. They don't even care if the people are innocent- they still enjoy the illusion that they are better than someone. But really, people who enjoy this list are sad commentaries on life in today's societal mix.
Yes, I'm aware that the people who come here to enjoy other people's misery are in support of this list, just as I'm sure that that there are probably a large percentage of men in prison who feel that forced sodomy should be legal in prison. It's all about the audience as to what they support.
This is real sad. "
realitybites wrote on Oct 5, 2009 1:26 PM:
realitybites wrote on Oct 5, 2009 2:29 PM: