The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
JustAnotherManicMonday wrote on Sep 23, 2009 7:35 AM:
crooked6pence wrote on Sep 23, 2009 8:40 AM:
Froggie1559 wrote on Sep 23, 2009 8:50 AM:
realitybites wrote on Sep 23, 2009 10:05 AM:
crooked6pence wrote on Sep 23, 2009 11:23 AM:
You go Napa P.D.?
The article is about the California Highway Patrol, a State agency, not the City Police...
Keep up the cheer leading though; rah, rah, rah. "
Froggie1559 wrote on Sep 23, 2009 1:00 PM:
reality1 wrote on Sep 23, 2009 1:00 PM:
Cowboy wrote on Sep 23, 2009 2:33 PM:
realitybites wrote on Sep 23, 2009 3:00 PM:
golfpro wrote on Sep 23, 2009 4:31 PM:
random name here wrote on Sep 23, 2009 6:48 PM:
Checkpoints must have high visibility, and it is not illegal to avoid them as long as doing so violates no vehicle codes or exibits signs of intoxication.
Advance notice to the public is required, although there is no requirement to disclose the specific location. It must be conducted in an area prone to high incidence of alcohol-related accidents or arrests.
Officers must establish a mathmatical procedure for stopping vehicles. i.e. every vehicle, every 3rd, 5th, 8th vehicle etc. "
rz1 wrote on Sep 24, 2009 12:15 PM:
amazed wrote on Sep 24, 2009 2:42 PM:
ctworker wrote on Sep 24, 2009 4:50 PM:
crooked6pence wrote on Sep 24, 2009 4:54 PM:
pinkflame wrote on Sep 24, 2009 7:47 PM:
JustAnotherManicMonday wrote on Sep 25, 2009 8:39 AM:
realitybites wrote on Sep 25, 2009 9:20 AM:
cheezcakemaker wrote on Sep 25, 2009 10:42 AM:
As always, who, what, when, WHERE and why. "
reason-ator wrote on Sep 25, 2009 1:06 PM:
Obviously, there is some conjecture that a conscious effort is being made to not discourage tourism by inconveniencing the drivers who have over-tasted with a DUI checkpoint. In fact, workers from wineries have been here and cited the lack of out-of-town drivers on the gossip-list shows how wonderful the tourists that the wineries attract are. I'm not buying it. "
amazed wrote on Sep 25, 2009 1:06 PM:
Piquemyinterest wrote on Sep 25, 2009 4:03 PM:
ao1982 wrote on Sep 25, 2009 6:07 PM:
--Armando "
ao1982 wrote on Sep 26, 2009 3:50 PM:
sunny wrote on Sep 26, 2009 7:35 PM:
Napa local wrote on Sep 26, 2009 8:20 PM:
justmeandyou wrote on Sep 26, 2009 9:20 PM:
JJtoob wrote on Sep 26, 2009 10:57 PM:
JustAnotherManicMonday wrote on Sep 28, 2009 2:59 PM:
oldtownnapa wrote on Sep 28, 2009 11:42 PM: