Money lag makes district creative to keep building AmCan High
Construction continues on American Canyon High School, which is scheduled to open in August 2010. A delay in money owed from the state is forcing the Napa Valley Unified School District to be creative in keeping the project going. J.L. Sousa/Register |
Buy photos
By NATALIE HOFFMAN
Register Staff Writer
November 20th, 2009
November 17th, 2009
November 16th, 2009
November 15th, 2009
November 12th, 2009
November 9th, 2009
November 8th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 24th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 16th, 2009
November 26th, 2009
November 25th, 2009
November 24th, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 17th, 2009
The state is $44 million behind in money for Napa school construction projects, but American Canyon High School is still expected to open on schedule in the fall, local school officials say.
California’s budget crisis is to blame for a slowdown in the arrival of state matching funds owed to Napa Valley Unified School District for projects approved under Measure G, a $183 million bond approved by voters in 2006, and the $95 million Measure M bond of 2002.
Don Evans, the district’s director of school planning and construction, said the state money virtually always gets to the district between 60 and 90 days from the approval of bond projects.
“It is the first time we’ve ever been in this position,” he said.
To make up for the cash crunch, the district is borrowing from some of its own reserves and is trying to collect anticipated property tax proceeds to keep major construction projects running until the state money arrives, Evans said. More income came from the district’s recent sale one of its properties in Browns Valley — a 10-acre site that brought in about $10 million, Evans said.
About $6 million of that went toward paying the design phase of American Canyon High School. Finally, Napa Valley College owes the district $1.5 million for the three college classrooms going into the new high school site.
Evans said the city of American Canyon owes the district an unspecified amount of money, but the district also owes the city some money, though Evans could not immediately say how much.
Major Measure G projects affected by the state’s cash flow slowdown include the completion of American Canyon High School, renovations of Memorial Stadium and New Technology High School.
To keep these moving along, the district may postpone some smaller projects under Measure G, including updating security systems at various district high and middle schools.
The district is simultaneously struck by a temporary shortage of state money owed for already completed Measure M work at Yountville Elementary School, Valley Oak High School and Harvest Middle School, Evans said.
Expected to arrive anywhere from early 2011 to sometime in 2012, the state money is slated for state-mandated modernizations for campuses at least
25 years old, including making provisions for the Americans With Disabilities Act, switching to more efficient lighting systems, adding insulation and other changes, Evans said.
With so many construction projects under way, the money can’t come fast enough.
“We hope they get it in early 2011 so they can bid other Measure G projects (we’d) have to delay,” Evans said. “But it’s still too early to call that and no one in Sacramento is saying.”
Although the district is feeling the pinch of a slowdown in money from the state, the construction industry is hurting for work.
Evans said most recent district construction jobs are coming in at least 20 percent below anticipated costs. For instance, he said, 18 months ago, Napa New Technology High School’s campus renovation was a $10 million project, but now it will cost just
$8.5 million to complete.
Moreover, the district is fortunate in another way. Unlike with many districts out of the area, most local school construction projects are primarily paid for with bonds and don’t depend as much on state funding. Consequently, the district has avoided having to put the brakes on major projects, whereas many districts are not so lucky, Evans said.
District Board Trustee Jackie Dickson said it’s in the district’s best interests to move ahead with all current major construction projects.
“I’m always concerned about our budget and I do have concerns about the state coming through with funds. But the projects have started and they need to be completed. ... I think it would be more harmful if we halted the projects than to go ahead,” she said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
blackpony wrote on Oct 10, 2009 12:51 AM:
Manxkat wrote on Oct 10, 2009 10:25 AM:
Maybe people will remember this when the schools ask us for more taxes like the parcel tax they are now seriously considering. "
LMW wrote on Oct 10, 2009 10:33 AM:
Many dollars were poured into this project, but the walkability for the students at the new high school gets one big F!
I know who is responsible for not seeing that need, and many folks here continue to not see that throughout the planning of schools. Not an expert, but as parent, yes, I believe we should have safe options for students on how they can get to school. Our environments are telling us, we do need to reverse our thinking on how we get our kids to and from the school.
Thank goodness for Safe Routes to School, but SRTS programming is not available to our high schools yet and as supporter for their cause, I press for many causes and will continue to remind all, at local and national levels where were making mistakes.
Its all in the design of our projects and how the children benefit from a good plan. We also should not encourage folks to continue thinking that the drop off and pick zones have to be used. We need police and fire for real emergencies and not to watch our school zones, we ourselves should stand up and tell districts it is a priority in planning our school zones that students are visible and safe, the dollars spent here, where's the innovative thinkers for those 2 feet! I believe it noticeable we have paved sidewalks for walkers, so if we connect our dots it should not be difficult to finish a good plan. "
burt wrote on Oct 10, 2009 11:59 AM:
Your theories are amusing but just that, theories inside your head. "
Raven wrote on Oct 10, 2009 12:21 PM:
noblindershere wrote on Oct 10, 2009 5:47 PM:
matt wrote on Oct 10, 2009 9:20 PM:
That is exactly what the district did. The HS is being built through a lease-lease back. That means the district hired a "leasor" to build the school at a guaranteed maximum price. No good ole boys, no drama. Just professionals doing what they do best: building schools. Blaming the contractor or the disrict for the State's lack of funding is, well, showing your lack of understanding the process. Just curious, what are your credentials? "
LMW wrote on Oct 10, 2009 11:58 PM:
napa1957 wrote on Oct 11, 2009 12:07 AM: