The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Just Concerned wrote on Oct 12, 2009 6:16 PM:
alixzander wrote on Oct 12, 2009 9:12 PM:
blackpony wrote on Oct 13, 2009 12:14 AM:
tiredofcomplainingnapkins wrote on Oct 13, 2009 12:19 AM:
I hope your joking! Its the towns fault that a kid would do this? Theres tens of thousands of kids growing up in Napa County and if one of them vandalizes something then its the towns fault for breeding those conditions for that to happend? Out of those tens of thousands of kids, one vandalizes something and its the towns fault? Sounds more like the parents fault to me. I'm not sure what your argument is? Espically since this is an isolated incident involving a couple of possible youths out of tens of thousands of kids in this county "
reason-ator wrote on Oct 13, 2009 1:32 AM:
Personally, wouldn't it be fun to have target practice with the car the vandals were riding around in ? I mean. first we'd have to take the vandals out of the car, right ? "
firststreetmayor wrote on Oct 13, 2009 7:04 AM:
mentality, do the crime and have the D.A. of Napa not wanting to do a thing about it. "
alixzander wrote on Oct 13, 2009 7:07 AM:
sprklsunshine wrote on Oct 13, 2009 8:57 AM:
amazed wrote on Oct 13, 2009 9:00 AM:
napaknowitall wrote on Oct 13, 2009 9:04 AM:
Alixzander- are you implying that only Am Can has troubled youth? Because I grew up in American Canyon and I was never in trouble and am I good member in my community. If you think the riots at VHS were only Am Can children you are living with shades over your eyes. "
notanapanative wrote on Oct 13, 2009 9:13 AM:
the only folks responsible for keeping youth entertained and amused are their parents and the kids themselves.
As someone who has lived in 3 different countries, and a couple of different states here in the US, the local youth have nothing to complain about.
If someone commits a a crime the only people responsible for that act is the perpetrator (and their parents if they are underaged).
This bizarre notion you have that the youth are somehow owed more than they are getting is absurd. I can only wait until you grow up and enter the real world.
Until then we will continue to pay our multiple school bond levies and 6th highest taxes in the country so that we can all enjoy the privilege of living in this great state. While a few bored youth complain about the "poor conditions" they are forced to live under by the county. "
doscentavos wrote on Oct 13, 2009 9:37 AM:
tiredofcomplainingnapkins wrote on Oct 13, 2009 10:12 AM:
What about all the kids in this town who are taking college prep classes and getting 4.0's in school. What about the kdis that are voulantering to clean up the river, work at the vets home, help at the homeless shelter and food bank. Or what about the kids that are outdoors using Napas huge amount of parks to play basketball or soccer, or hikes and bike rides at alston or skyline, or bbqs at kennedy and fuller. Theres so much do in this town and most the kids seem to be taking advantage of these opportunities. Don't let a couple of bad apples make you think the entire apple tree is bad. "
Grits wrote on Oct 13, 2009 12:50 PM:
The town/county didn't create this, and in SOME cases, as doscentavos correctly states, the parents HAVE done their job, and the kid just does something STUPID and NEEDLESS, for whatever reason he/she determines in their own unformed/misinformed little brain!!
My son did - he's a fine man now, but there was a moment in time, and it was TORTURE, as it is for any conscientious parent - WHY???!!!
One time he said to me (paraphrased) - "Mom. did it ever occur to you that I knew I'd been taught better and thought about the consequences and did it anyway?" A scary thing to hear, but truthful nonetheless - there are many kids going through the juvenile system that have no issues that got them there except their own stupidity. Believe me, I know.... "
telebender wrote on Oct 13, 2009 2:04 PM:
alixzander wrote on Oct 13, 2009 3:26 PM:
certainly not every youth living in this town resorts to property damage as a cry for help. i am simply suggesting that the kids that do engage in more productive activities are doing so despite the neglectful attitude of this county and its towns. I'd also like to point out that no one on here is denying that this county doesn't have much for the youth. there aren't venues, art spaces, skating rinks, and whatnot. certainly the situation is improving. there are open mics, concerts, really really free markets, and more activism then there has been in the past few years (if not decades). however, all of this has been happening as a reaction to a condition that has existed in this county. its a condition that has overlooked the youth. this is crucial to remember. if you people can't understand this then i don't know what to tell you. keep telling the youth to behave without addressing the causes and see if that keeps failing.
another point I'd like to make: i attended a youth violence forum last year. the forum was organized in response to a mugging and death that occurred by youth. the discussion was framed as a gang issue (although the police themselves said there wasn't gang linkage). the adults at this meeting noticed and stated that there weren't many youth there. the adults claimed they wanted to hear from the youth and understand their side. so why then, when someone like me tries to represent the youth voice is it ignored? if you aren't going to listen to what the youth is telling you then stop complaining about your youth crime. "
tiredofcomplainingnapkins wrote on Oct 13, 2009 3:48 PM:
What more can the city do? They already provide us with more parks then just about any other city I have ever been to. There are youth sports leagues for just about every sport in all age groups that the county puts together. If your upset there isn't any skating rinks, art spaces or other venues then you have to blame the people not the city. Those are private businesses that private people have to open, A city can't be responsible to open a skating rink or other venues. Thats up to businessmen. Don't blame the city for criminal acts by bad people. Be happy you live in a country where food and water is easily accessible. For over a billion kids a day have to spend there days looking for food and water, and you want to complain that kids have nothing to do so they destroy other peoples property, We have it so easy in this country and I don't see your argument at all "
napabicycler wrote on Oct 13, 2009 3:58 PM:
notanapanative wrote on Oct 13, 2009 4:38 PM:
Until you realize and take ownership of the fact that only you are responsible for your own actions (or lack there of), and only you can challenge yourself to do something positive with your life, you will be miserable and unhappy.
I would ask you to answer how previous generations managed to grow up and make due with so much less.
Do you even realize that there was a time when 1 tv or stereo per household was the norm?
There was no such thing as Xbox or Playstation and you were expected to walk or ride your bike to whatever you were going to do.
As a child I rode my bike 20 miles one way so I could could go fishing on the weekend.
The point is a simple one, stop complaining and get off your butt and do something for yourself! "
alixzander wrote on Oct 13, 2009 6:06 PM:
in regards to the city not being responsible for creating "entertainment" outlets? that is a gray statement. however, the city defiantly has the ability to create policies that foster entertainment outlets that are youth relevant. its great that sports teams exist. this is a good outlet for many youth. but there are lots of other youth that don't relate with sports. and for them, there are few places to turn. "
funnyme wrote on Oct 13, 2009 6:33 PM:
Does anyone remember a movie back in the 70's called schizophrenia? "
notpc wrote on Oct 13, 2009 7:06 PM:
alixzander wrote on Oct 13, 2009 7:58 PM:
I’m down to come over and watch silly movies. My e-mail address is alexshantz@gmail.com. I think open conversations about these issues within the community are what we need.
And notpc, if you read my post carefully you would have noticed that I said "it’s a condition that, among other things, has been created by bad policies". Amoung other things mean that it isn't exclusively the city. So obviously everything wasn't being blamed on the city. And since I clearly implied that vandalizing cars was destructive your statement about youth advocates causing green lights for property damage also seems disingenuous. I am not sure what youth advocate you are referring to. Certainly no one that is apart of this conversation.
My main crux is that there is a condition in this city that is rooted within several things including poor policies, disproportionate economic system, and a dominate upper class culture, and this condition is having a dire effect on the locals and especially the youth. I have offered several examples to support these claims. Zero decibel noise ordinances, difficulty for local businesses (such as smoking cat café), and statements by rich people at Downtown Napa Specific Plan meetings saying “we want an affordable downtown, but by affordable we don’t mean lower income”. "
shareathought wrote on Oct 13, 2009 8:16 PM:
[At one time, I was in a more expensive clothing store downtown, and observed a group of our youth (from the most exclusive area of our community), "shopping".
They had been to a movie (I overheard comments) and had apparently made purchases but were "hitting" jewelry counters and pocketing other small items, as, they quickly walked through stores.
These were not the bored, neglected nor poor.
I'd guess they may have "dared" each other; by their demeanor, they obviously thought it was just a lark/not serious.
It happened so fast there wasn't time for "calling security" within the store.
I am sure they are now "upstanding" adults (those that get caught generally, seem to go to Target or Walmart).
Some of us do stupid things in life, some get caught, some don't.]
Its sad that whomever has been vandalizing doesn't know/care what the real cost is to those who must pay for the repairs. "
Just Concerned wrote on Oct 13, 2009 9:06 PM:
kdbk wrote on Oct 13, 2009 11:30 PM:
Restaurants, sports, movies, shopping, friends' houses, the woods/mountains, off-roading, part-time jobs, hobbies, dating, studying, out of town trips, church, neighbors, chores, library, clubs, games, dancing, t.v., radio, texting...there are all kinds of things for kids to do that don't involve criminal damage and significant financial cost to innocent victims.
Socialist ideology enslaves the minds of people and leads them to ridiculous conclusions like: kids who break the rules aren't actually to blame for their wrongdoing. "
Grits wrote on Oct 14, 2009 10:05 AM:
Some of us do stupid things in life, some get caught, some don't.
shareathought -
Were you ever caught in your stupidity? Or did you get away with it (as so many do) & turn out to be an "upstanding" adult? "
Grits wrote on Oct 14, 2009 10:25 AM:
AmCanBlogger wrote on Oct 15, 2009 8:16 AM:
I didn’t understand your use of the phrase “disproportionate economic system.” Huh? Ours is a Capitalist system in which the individual sets their own sites and succeeds (or fails) by their own decisions; it’s life. Are you or your parents and/or guardians currently collecting any unearned welfare or other unearned benefits from the State of California or the Federal Government? It sure sounds like it, and that you may have picked up their bitterness at their failure to provide better for themselves, and by transfer, for you. I hope you are not in training to become a member of the victim class.
Your phrase, “…a dominate upper class culture” smacks of the type of speech one would expect to hear in Berkeley. Would you explain what you meant on that line? Would you define that culture, and what is wrong with it>
Although I thank you for taking this time to discuss things here, and by the way, very articulately, I cannot but come away with the impression that the adults (?) you have followed, listened to and now have as possible role models all consist of people who depend on the government for their existence. It sounds as though you hang around "Acorn" associates. "
shareathought wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:49 PM:
"someone" did some vandalizing in our south county & most of us are ready to blame our youth. Is it because we remember/understand, therefore it is more socially acceptable?
[Grits, my thought is/was that many of us go through "stupid". I think it is just before we realize we don't have to do something just because someone says "dare you" and probably right after we think "opps, I shouldn't have done that."
Most pass through a period of time that we are out from under our parents immediate control, feel a bit too brave, and then, realize someone pays the consequences. Most of us don't "get caught" but most often the less financially solvent pay a greater price.
I believe it has everything and nothing to do with genetics, home environment or parenting skills; it is as often the make-up of the individual and chance.]
alixzander gave a lot to this discussion (thank you); I appreciate the comments & agree that there is not a lot for youth in this community_ particularly, those neither scholastically inclined nor sports-minded-persons, yet, it is not a valid excuse for destruction of another's possessions.
There are restrictions on the young being employed (many of us worked and yet had energy left-over to still get in trouble).
Meanwhile, we might consider that the vandalism may be being carried out by bitter adults. "
alixzander wrote on Oct 19, 2009 9:01 AM:
if you can't understand how a zero decidable noise ordinance can hamper the development of art and music, then i don't know what to tell you. what has often happened in this town, is since there haven't been many music venues musically inclined kids will host shows at their homes. and these always get shut down by cops due to the zero decidable ordinance and neighbors that don't understand the importance of youth having these outlets. i'd also like to point out that house shows is an example of kids doing something, instead of just complaining, about their bad situation and they are often criminalized for it.
in regards to your incorrect evaluation of capitalism: firstly, it was extremely offensive and unnecessary to presume anything about my personal background (which was wrong by the way). capitalism is inherently unequal. under capitalism, wealth tends to rest in the hands of a few. and this wealth rests there while people starve, lose homes, and get sick. another example, if i am accused of a crime and don't have money i won't be able to afford a great lawyer. if a rich person commits a crime they can afford a great lawyer. and that ties into my comment about the dominate culture.
generally speaking, the dominate culture (in Napa) would be the wealthy business owners, rich, and city officials. and whats wrong with this: vacant buildings sitting down town because wealthy property owners can afford it, since they have the money and power the decisions in this town seem to reflect their wants before our needs, and of course poeple from the Downtown Napa Specific Plan meetings saying “we want an affordable downtown, but by affordable we don’t mean lower income”. " "
AmCanBlogger wrote on Oct 21, 2009 7:35 AM:
AmCanBlogger wrote on Oct 21, 2009 7:38 AM:
AmCanBlogger wrote on Oct 21, 2009 7:39 AM: