The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Paddy wrote on Oct 27, 2009 1:47 PM:
Thank you Diane Dillon! "
fedupwithpoliticos wrote on Oct 27, 2009 2:51 PM:
nightwatchman wrote on Oct 27, 2009 4:29 PM:
jmo wrote on Oct 27, 2009 5:42 PM:
A further investigation is needed in this turn about by the Sups! What gives or who gave?? "
gaslight wrote on Oct 27, 2009 6:05 PM:
This article raises many questions and answers none. Can the Register follow up on this action and fill us in, or must we wait until the hearing on Dec. 1st to figure out what's going on? Maybe someone else who attended the meeting can enlighten us. "
Jasper wrote on Oct 27, 2009 8:31 PM:
The fact that Dodd is unhappy with the "second chance" is some inkling that it is not being exercised to really change the vote of the supervisors.
Just guessing here. "
Paddy wrote on Oct 27, 2009 10:39 PM:
jmo wrote on Oct 27, 2009 10:58 PM:
The truth will get leaked. It is a matter of time. So who will step up and answer gaslight's questions? "
sharonden wrote on Oct 27, 2009 11:18 PM:
abouttime wrote on Oct 28, 2009 12:02 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Oct 28, 2009 2:21 AM:
Paddy wrote on Oct 28, 2009 7:49 AM:
I only hope Mr. Wagenknecht does the right thing and continue to represent those of us who voted him as supervisor to stop projects just like this one. "
seasoned citizen wrote on Oct 28, 2009 9:00 AM:
reader wrote on Oct 28, 2009 9:17 AM:
4466 wrote on Oct 28, 2009 11:33 AM:
4466 wrote on Oct 28, 2009 11:40 AM:
Fiesty1 wrote on Oct 28, 2009 12:24 PM:
http://napa.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=2 "
countyresident wrote on Oct 28, 2009 10:20 PM:
jmo wrote on Oct 28, 2009 11:33 PM:
The theme here is "Us vs. Them" step forward and fight!!!
Only really big money can force this forward! Still want to know why someone from a former big family name wine/winery name isn’t coming forward as a major investor and talking about what the benefits of this project are to the citizens of Napa County. Is Mr.? working thru the back waters of the Napa to ensure change (or is it INSURE change)? Guess I am going start going into the alphabet.
Think I’ll start in the middle third, why not? I thought everyone started at the beginning and that's why I think it takes so long to get the answer!
Wish I had the “unnamed sources in the know?”… maybe you do?.
Maybe diggers will start at the beginning and ending of the list? It shouldn’t take you too long (maybe a week or two). I’ll race you to the finish.
Are any of us/you are brave enough to handle the fall out? Not sure here…perhaps you aren’t either. Brad wasn’t!
What say you? "