NVR Logo
Whitman in Napa: "Put jobs first"
Governor hopeful speaks to state Chamber of Commerce
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Save and Share Share
Republican gubernatorial hopeful Meg Whitman said Friday that California is on the verge of a “negative tipping point” and that the state’s next governor must create jobs or risk sending California over the edge.

“We have to put jobs first,” Whitman said during a speech to the California Chamber of Commerce during its fall retreat at the Westin Verasa in Napa.
“If we don’t create a fundamental change in job creation, there’s no way out of this,” she said.

Whitman, former president and CEO of eBay, told the crowd of about 100 people that California must ease up on taxation, regulation and bureaucracy in order for businesses in the state to thrive.
“It’s very hard to get things done in California if you’re a small business,” Whitman said, charging that California’s regulations are perhaps the most draconian in the country.

“What I learned at eBay that is important to this governor’s race is the importance of small business,” Whitman said. “I also saw how government can get in the way of small business.”
To solve this, California must streamline regulations or risk sending employers elsewhere, Whitman said.

Environmental regulations, in particular, should not supersede economic interests, she said. Whitman has called for a moratorium on Assembly Bill 32, meant to bring California’s greenhouse gas emissions down to 1990 levels.

“I think we have to restore some balance between the environmentalists and creating jobs,” Whitman said. While laudable, AB 32, “puts California at a competitive disadvantage,” she argued.

In addition, California must lower taxes, Whitman said.

“Tax rates are actually hurting the development of small businesses,” she said. “Without more employers, we will not have more employees.”

Whitman said the state should implement a sales tax exemption for manufacturers on the equipment they buy. California should also offer a tax credit for research and development, she said; and give a marginal tax rate decrease to middle income Californians, including a number of small business owners.

Strategies such as these would help Napa Valley as much as the rest of the state, she said.

In an interview, Whitman said Napa Valley’s wine industry is “very representative of small businesses in the state of California.”

She said the industry would benefit from lower taxes and streamlined regulations. Perhaps most importantly, the wine industry needs the economy as a whole to turn around, she said.

“People are pulling back on their discretionary spending, and many people consider wine discretionary spending,” Whitman said. “Until we put people back to work … they’re not going to buy that extra bottle of wine for dinner.”

Whitman said she favors a guest worker program for the agriculture industry that would allow workers from Mexico and elsewhere to “come up and pick grapes and go home.” This would be a way to crack down on illegal immigration without hurting agriculture, she said.

While her No. 1 issue is jobs, Whitman said in her speech that the state must also rein in spending and do a better job of educating kids.

“We have a spending problem of epic proportions,” she said.

Whitman said California should eliminate 40,000 state jobs, consolidate departments and use technology to deliver services at a lower cost.

She also said schools should be more accountable at the local level, and that good teachers should get raises while bad teachers are thrown out.

Whitman touched quickly on the issue of same-sex marriage, stating that she supports civil unions but not gay marriage. But “while the social issues are important,” Whitman said, “most voters are focused on other issues.”

She also addressed the issue of state-mandated affordable housing during an interview with the Register. The requirements have long been a source of political distress in the agricultural Napa County.

“I don’t think it’s the state’s job to tell Napa how much affordable housing they need to have,” Whitman said. “Philosophically, I want to push down responsibility and accountability to the local level.”

Other Republican candidates in the 2010 gubernatorial race include former congressman Tom Campbell and Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner. Poizner is scheduled to visit Napa next week.

Democratic candidate and San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom bowed out of the race on Friday, leaving Attorney General Jerry Brown — who has not officially declared his candidacy — as the only major Democratic candidate in the race.
16 comment(s)

wb5218 wrote on Oct 31, 2009 12:31 AM:

" Thank you for the concern Ms. Whitman.

Unfortunately Napa County does not believe in any new job creation.

Just jobs for harvesting grapes for 1 to 2 months a year. "

calistoga_tony wrote on Oct 31, 2009 1:49 AM:

" At this point, not being able to trust any politician, my requirements for a vote are simple. Push for mandatory E-Verify for every employer in CA, that will create instant jobs and move illegals back to their country of origin or to another state.

Just waiting for word.. which candidate will make locking down the border, enforcing immigration laws, and punishing employers that hire illegals priority number one. That person will get my vote, my support and my money. "

kkjp wrote on Oct 31, 2009 7:24 AM:

" I don't consider voting for ANY candidate who has not bothered to participate in our most basic privilege and responsibility - the right to vote. Whitman was 46 YEARS OLD before ever registering to vote for the first time in 2002, and has voted only occasionally since.

Depending on who her audience is, she gives the excuse of either having been too busy raising a family and working (aren't we all, but we still find time to vote) or having wanted to stay "politically neutral" as head of EBay (though she did, in fact, vote a couple times during that period, but not for decades prior to that time) - two very different excuses.

Sorry, not good enough to consider her as a candidate worthy of my vote. "

Raven wrote on Oct 31, 2009 9:18 AM:

" maybe actually participating in the process by taking the time to vote, even filling out an absentee ballot, would have been a place to start... "

cheezcakemaker wrote on Oct 31, 2009 9:57 AM:

" "California is on the verge of a “negative tipping point”

I was under the impression that we had already tipped and are running in the negative.

Maybe I will vote too. If I can get around to it. After all, it really isn't all that important if I vote or not. I will however just keep on complaining with the rest of the non voters and keep paying my taxes without exercising the most basic of rights in a free society. "

reason-ator wrote on Oct 31, 2009 11:30 AM:

" I'm not thrilled about her record of voting either, but there have to be other issues that are important, too.

I mean, I have never missed a chance to vote, but that alone doesn't qualify me to be governor. My infallible intelligence does, though. "

steph wrote on Oct 31, 2009 11:31 AM:

" I'll take a job creator over a voter any day of the week. Look what voting has gotten us in this state--especially with the referendum process. Simply nonsense. It is the businesses who bring prosperity to this state, in SPITE of the politicians who grandstand for our votes. So she didn't vote--blah blah blah.

I like Meg Whitman's message, but I'm afraid politics isn't business. The unions and other special interests that are ruining the state via self-serving politicians can't be fired, unfortunately, for poor performance. The governor can't mandate efficiency--so sad. I'd like to think Meg could change the state around, but I'm not that naive. Arnold-the-candidate put tears in my eyes with his ideas, too, but he quickl learned he was up against a wall when he tried to implement change. Sadly, I think the state is lost. Education is the first to suffer, not the last. Government cannot create sustainable jobs, only get out of the way of businesses that can.

As far as civil rights for homosexuals, I'm disappointed that Meg is too chicken to stand up against unconstitutional discrimination. I guess she is shrewd enough to know that the voters don't want gay marriage. And yet, I really believe that the economy of California, and repairing education, are bigger priorities that affect us all--gay and straight.

If only I believed that anyone could run this state well instead of into the ground.

I will probably go ahead and vote for her and see what she pulls off. "

LMW wrote on Oct 31, 2009 11:49 AM:

" “I don’t think it’s the state’s job to tell Napa how much affordable housing they need to have,” Whitman said. “Philosophically, I want to push down responsibility and accountability to the local level.”

NO THANK YOU!! We wish to have thousands of Californians collect unemployment and just come in to my county and tell the rest of California what residents of Napa County need or don't need! thats a real leader? NO thank you, she can wear a business hat any day of the week but not a Governors hat!!!!!and I'm for candidate that will assist the everyday folks that work real hard and not view the general population as part of a business venture, the role of governor will hold accountability and responsibilty and I believe I know a candidate who can enforce that in everything.
Californias needs a spirit that will press for Cal and Im afraid we should continue waiting for another candidate to come forward. "

Ex-eBaySeller wrote on Oct 31, 2009 11:51 AM:

" What part of this message is confusing, “We have to put jobs first,” Whitman said "California should eliminate 40,000 state jobs"

This is the woman who's golden boy has creatively disrupted eBay to the point that thousands of small sellers, many of whom are disabled and unemployable in the workplace have lost their eBay business. Favored sellers on eBay are now high volume sellers of imported remaindered trash.

I would vote for her, You betcha! Not. "

hawkins707 wrote on Oct 31, 2009 12:02 PM:

" It's either her or wait for another Gavin Newsome to come out the shadows and run for office. I say get behind this women who apparently knows economics well enough to head up a successful company such as Ebay, and remain positive about the future of this great state. Look up her time at Ebay, the company blew up financially, and expanded tremendously. She seems to be an intelligent woman, who genuinely wants to fix California's economic mess. I'm glad that we have her running. "

steph wrote on Oct 31, 2009 1:07 PM:

" "She didn't vote, she didn't vote!"

PLATITUDES. Meaningless drivel. "

misfit wrote on Oct 31, 2009 2:53 PM:

" ebay got caught up in the dot com frenzy. Right place, right time. How many 21 year old millionaires are there out there because of a great idea gone wild? It wouldn't make them attractive gubernatorial candidates would it? "

napathinker wrote on Oct 31, 2009 2:57 PM:

" I have been a "Liberal" Democrat all of my 56 years.(I am a "straight" male) I have not voted in every election I've been able to either for my own reasons. I have been leaning to more "Moderate" thinking lately, reading legislation and other available information as it presents it from many sources including, Yes, radio talk shows. While these shows are ranting, raving, radical slants both left and right, they do give you information and various sources of information you can investigate for yourself. RADICAL Liberal polititians have obviously really messed up California. Arnold has "siphoned all the Kennedy" out of Maria Shriver( and has done some dangerous things for California now). We need someone like Ms Whitman. Jerry Brown was already Govenor once when he was "doing" Linda Ronstad way back when? He was no help. We definetly don't want a "Gavin Newsom" or his type as our Govenor. He is worse than Harvey Milk reincarntated. The moral degregation and the current legislation that is piggybacking on top of it is costing the State of California Millions of $$$ in legal fees that we cannot afford. Ms Whitman is correct in that we need to fix education, jobs, and other areas that are WAY MORE IMPORTANT to all Californian's before making "Social Issues" major priority decisions for a small minority (less than 5%) of our population. Fix California for ALL the citizens, then we'll look at special issues. I will stay a registered Democrat, but until something really drastic comes along to change my mind, I will be voting for Meg Whitman for our next Govenor. Lord knows us men have messed it up long enough, I think this great, forward thinking woman is the one to finally set us in the right direction. "

wb5218 wrote on Oct 31, 2009 11:12 PM:

" LMW???
What kind of Democrat are you??? "

LMW wrote on Nov 1, 2009 12:44 AM:

" who said i was Democrat! "

David j. Ingraham wrote on Nov 1, 2009 1:12 AM:

" I used to be a democrat, but changed to republican, because of the change was not respectful to the rights, of the people. The democrats adopted the green party environmental causes, with out concern for problems of the people.
I like Meg Whitman, and yes she has got it right. She knows how to bring back prosperity to our state with out raising taxes. Our state not only need her to be Governor, but we also need a republican legislature, that will help her change our state laws to be respectful of our freedom, and rights to earn a living with out being over taxed "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy