County may offer breaks for green work
By MIKE TRELEVEN
Register Staff Writer
November 23rd, 2009
November 22nd, 2009
Sometimes, going green or switching to renewable energy sources comes with a hefty price tag.
To help get around that barrier, Napa County officials are considering the idea of offering loans to businesses and homeowners who install green and energy-saving technologies such as double-paned windows, low-flow toilets, tankless hot water heaters, more efficient heating and air conditioning units or solar panels.
The loans would be made possible through Assembly Bill 811, signed by Gov. Schwarzenegger in 2008, The law permits cities and counties to put the cost for qualifying upgrades to their properties on their property tax bills — spreading the cost over 20 years. If the person moves, the outstanding loan balance is taken over by the next owner.
About a half dozen people, ranging from a businessman to a Realtor, encouraged the Napa County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday morning to move forward with the program.
“Sustainable Napa County is behind you 100 percent to make this happen,” Jeri Hansen-Gill, CEO of Sustainable Napa County, told the supervisors.
Finding the money
Steve Lederer, director of Environmental Management for Napa County, said in an interview the big stumbling block for Napa County is where to find seed funds for the program.
All five county supervisors on Tuesday said they are supportive of the program or something like it. The only communities in the North Bay currently offering a form of the program are Sonoma County and Berkeley.
Sonoma County started the program in March with $25 million in funds.
“I’d like to see Napa County try to start with $5 million to $10 million. Whether it is enough is difficult to say, but is a reasonable start. Berkeley started with $1.3 million and the program sold out in an afternoon,” Lederer said.
Supervisor Keith Caldwell said Napa County should “not pull all the weight. Have we talked to the cities to see if they want to be involved?” he asked.
Lederer said there have been no formal conversations with any of the cities to see if they want to participate in the program.
Hansen-Gill said she has informally talked to a couple of Napa City Council members and “they have shown some interest. It just takes time. We just need to put our heads together and come up with something. I believe there is a real positive interest.”
Supervisor Bill Dodd said he thinks the program “is very important.” He mulled investigating some alternatives, wondering aloud if local banks could help get a program off the ground.
“There are other models out there. This is all very premature,” Napa County Treasurer-Tax Collector Tamie Frasier said. More research is needed, she said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
savenapa wrote on Nov 1, 2009 1:30 AM:
I hope the sellers have to disclose the loans that they have "rolled" into the taxes. What a deal. Only in California can I now do a remodel or a presale spruce up and force the future homeowner to pay for it. I suppose those sixty thousand dollar argon charged dual glazed low-E mahogany and maple windows I just rolled into my property taxes are no longer a selling point Martha. "
jack27022003 wrote on Nov 1, 2009 8:05 AM:
LMW wrote on Nov 1, 2009 9:30 AM:
thoughtank wrote on Nov 1, 2009 7:36 PM:
As it now stands, there is very little incentive for building green, which can be costly to the builder upfront. Given that greener buildings with smaller footprints will benefit both builders and the larger culture by reducing resource consumption, we need to redesign the entire building incentive/disincentive fee structure.
City and county officials, are you listening? "
antipc wrote on Nov 2, 2009 6:45 PM: