West Napa fire station remains stalled

2012-06-13T21:12:00Z 2012-06-14T22:03:17Z West Napa fire station remains stalledCHANTAL M. LOVELL Napa Valley Register
June 13, 2012 9:12 pm  • 

In the absence of a fire station to call its own, a wildfire disaster drill held in Browns Valley Wednesday morning was particularly valuable.

The city and county practiced evacuating residents at the western edge of Browns Valley, which is a long haul from the nearest fire station in downtown.

Because the city has inadequate funds, the site planned for a new westside fire station at 3001 Browns Valley Road sits empty and likely will remain so for the foreseeable future. The city bought the lot in 2008 using developer fire mitigation.

City Manager Mike Parness said it is unclear when the city could construct and staff a fifth fire station to serve Browns Valley where emergency response times are less than optimal.

“It’s on the list of things that need to be addressed,” Parness said. “It doesn’t make sense for us to prioritize it. We don’t have any money.”

For the first time in a decade, the city expects to be in a positive budget position in 2012-13, anticipating revenues will be $100,000 above expenses. But that turnaround does not mean the city is ready to pay for the station.

“Building it isn’t an issue,” said Parness, who estimated a station could be built and equipped for about $4 million to $5 million using capital improvement project dollars. In 2008, the City Council adopted a Fire and Paramedic Development fee to fund the construction of the station and equip it for fire and paramedic services.

The difficulty is finding the money to pay for the ongoing costs of another station, Parness said.

“Opening a fire station requires nine firefighters,” he said. “That would be an ongoing expense of maybe $1.5 million.”

The city’s newest fire station, No. 4 on Gasser Drive in south Napa, opened in January 2004 at a cost of $2.9 million, said Shirley Perkins, public safety administrative services officer.

In lieu of a Browns Valley station, the city and its emergency responders are trying to cut down on west Napa response times that can be close to 10 minutes long even when there is no traffic, according to Interim Fire Chief Mike Randolph.

Parness said response times to west Napa are one reason the city is studying the possibilities of constructing a series of roundabouts on First Street between California Boulevard and Freeway Drive. Although emergency vehicles emit a signal that turns lights in their path green, they can be stuck if traffic is severely backed up, he said.

American Medical Response has a unit stationed on Browns Valley Road when it is not responding to calls, Randolph said. From that spot, an ambulance can reach west Napa residents experiencing medical emergencies faster than a fire engine responding from Station 1 in downtown.

About 70 percent of the calls the city receives are medical, Randolph said.

“When they are present at that location, they can help us address medicals but we still have issues with fire response,” Randolph said.

Wednesday morning, about 65 emergency responders from roughly a dozen local agencies participated in a wildfire drill in Browns Valley. The drill simulated a fire off Partrick Road that spread to the city, causing a need for residents to evacuate.

“We’ve got all the resources, the agency representatives coming together to unify the command, determine how each agency will help one another to meet the objectives,” said Battalion Chief Steve Brassfield. “It’s important at any location, but we know our response time out here is a little bit longer than the norm.”

If an emergency occurs and downtown fire crews are tied-up, firefighters from the other stations respond, Parness said.

Parness said the city is aware of the need to add another fire station but said response times have not reached a “crisis situation.” For now, the station remains a future project that is discussed by the City Council when budgets are drafted and goals set.

Copyright 2015 Napa Valley Register. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) Comments

  1. Crosscountrykid
    Report Abuse
    Crosscountrykid - June 14, 2012 6:30 am
    Ya' know, I had it explained to me why an ambulance AND a fire engine had to go out on every call, but have to say I found the rationale, well...wanting. Seems awful expensive. With 70 percent of the calls being medical, economics would say have EMT's (better yet, paramedics) on the ambulances, and firefighters on the fire engines. Our excellent dispatchers can assess which, or both is needed. I understand other cities do it this way.
  2. glenroy
    Report Abuse
    glenroy - June 14, 2012 8:12 am
    Tax payers reasonable public employees better wise up…and cut the waste no add to it.
    The inefficiencies in the FD are in some ways like the old military school….send way more than needed.. the work schedules are beyond outdated going back to the horse and carriage logic….this costs millions annually but it is hardly just FD. There is a much bigger story to this story…
    The state finally admitted what they’ve been hiding the fact that state public employee retirement benefits are over $700 billion underfunded because the state employee unions have no clue how to invest their retirement funds… by far the worst in the nation.

  3. NAPAsince1976
    Report Abuse
    NAPAsince1976 - June 14, 2012 8:24 am
    I whole heartedly agree with the comment by Crosscountrykid. Interim Fire Chief Mike Randolph has it backwards due to the usual fire department hubris. His quote should be changed to say that NFD can help AMR address medicals. Also, remember that the local fire departments and County EMS thinks the idea of "staging" emergency response vehicles (ambulances) is a great idea. This scheme involves analyzing emergency locations and parking vehicles and crews thru out the city to reduce response times. I think the Napa FD should adopt this plan. All vehicles and crews could be stationed out of the city corporation yard; moved to preplanned locations each shift; thus reducing response times in all areas of the city. All fire stations could be eliminated and converted to community centers. Most likely the number of personnel could be reduced. I opine that with AMR handling medical calls and FD shifting to a "staging" model the budget could be reduced by 50%.
  4. FireDog
    Report Abuse
    FireDog - June 14, 2012 8:39 am
    You want to save some money and let more firemen work, 8hr shifts no overtime unless working a fire. Bring your own food from home.
    The days of the taxpayer funding food runs to Rayley's needs to stop!
    The days of firemen schedule with built in overtime needs to stop!
  5. tsgets
    Report Abuse
    tsgets - June 14, 2012 12:42 pm
    Firemen buy their own food...but anyhow, look city of Napa...you have the lot. Easy answer. Pull one truck from another station and park it there, fully staffed. Swich out the stations that provide the truck every week. Then you'll get an edge on your response time and save cash at the same time. AMR alreeady stashes ambulances around the county. No reason why the fire department can't do the same. You don't need 9 firefighters in BV 24-7.
  6. REPUBLICANKID
    Report Abuse
    REPUBLICANKID - June 14, 2012 9:56 pm
    Its not like you dont have 8 engines so all you need is the building.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick