Ambitious waste plan would target emissions

Official encourages innovation in presentation to city
2013-03-06T20:41:00Z 2013-03-06T20:42:01Z Ambitious waste plan would target emissionsCHANTAL M. LOVELL Napa Valley Register
March 06, 2013 8:41 pm  • 

Some cutting-edge changes are being considered for the city’s Materials Diversion Facility.

On Tuesday, the Napa City Council received a presentation on the Napa Renewable Resources Project to help the city reach its goal of diverting 75 percent of waste from the landfill by 2020 and meeting new regulations and standards.

In 2011, about 63 percent of the city’s waste was either recycled or composted.

Materials Diversion Administrator Kevin Miller presented five potential projects that could reduce the facility’s greenhouse gas emissions by 93 percent. “We’re trying to be proactive in all of this and not reactive,” he said.

In the next three to five years, Miller said the city will be required to have an updated stormwater treatment system at the facility, located south of the Napa County Airport, and will need to revamp open-air composting.

The cost of updating the stormwater system could range between $1.5 and $3 million, Miller said.

In the same time frame, the facility will need to change the way it composts, moving organic materials from outdoor piles to covered and contained bunkers, Miller said. That upgrade, costing between $6 million and $8 million, would not only better contain odors, but also prevent potential pollutants from seeping out.

“Using a covered bunker system for composing will help reduce the impacts of stormwater run-off by keeping rainwater isolated from the composting process itself,” Miller said. “This means less potential of pollutants entering stormwater.”

Napa Recycling and Waste is in the midst of a commercial food scraps composting program and hopes to eventually accept food waste from the public, which would increase the need to contain odors and pollutants from the composting facility, Miller said.

Miller said there are two or three other, optional upgrades the city could make to the city-owned facility to further reduce waste and increase sustainability.

One is an advanced composting process called anaerobic digestion, which composts materials at a high temperature in the absence of oxygen. The process is fully enclosed and produces methane, which is collected and converted to energy that can be used to power the facility and run waste collection vehicles.

“It’s the ultimate sustainability model if we can figure out a way to get there,” Miller said of the technology that could require an initial up-front investment of $7 million to $9 million.

Miller also suggested finding the means to establish a biomass plant, which he said has the potential to produce enough energy to not only meet current and future energy demands at the diversion and recycling facilities, but create a surplus large enough to power 200 homes annually.

A biomass plant, which could cost between $6 million and $7 million to establish, would take large wood debris and scrap construction lumber, which the city currently transports to a facility an hour away to be burned, and convert the waste to gas, Miller said. A second byproduct of the process is biochar, which can be sold by the pound as a fertilizer supplement.

In the coming years, Miller expects a steep increase in the amount of energy used at the facility because the state may require all vehicles be electric, and the new composting methods would require more energy consumption. If biomass technology were established in the south Napa facility, the energy produced would cover current and future needs.

As a “Plan B,” Miller proposed the installation of solar panels on the roofs at the materials diversion facility. This would cost between $1 million and $1.5 million.

When the facility receives a new roofing this summer, it will be made “solar ready” in the event the council chooses to go that route, he said.

Miller said there are various capital reserves in the solid waste fund that could potentially be used to get some improvements off the ground. Some rate and fee increases could also be pursued and borrowing is an option.

He said staff are pursuing grants for the upgrades.

The council is expected to review Miller’s proposals in the coming months.

“We all know we’re going to be facing some of these upgrades,” Councilman Peter Mott said. “Also, I think it’s the right thing to do. We want to have a state-of-the-art facility.”

City staff are moving forward with studies to meet the California Environmental Quality Act, which has bearing on some proposals.

Copyright 2015 Napa Valley Register. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(6) Comments

  1. Straight Talk
    Report Abuse
    Straight Talk - March 06, 2013 10:42 pm
    City residents are hugely fortunate to have Kevin Miller as a civil servant. Thank you council for stying on this track.
  2. Sickothis
    Report Abuse
    Sickothis - March 07, 2013 8:49 am
    I agree Mark.
  3. BennyD
    Report Abuse
    BennyD - March 07, 2013 10:25 am
    Excellent news. I worked on a project for Waste Connections inc. and their model was also recycling, composting, and capturing methane gas for fuel. This fuel could power our bus fleet and other transit sources. A win all around.
  4. glenroy
    Report Abuse
    glenroy - March 07, 2013 12:11 pm
    A complete, if not total, waste of tax payer money which will have an insignificant impact at best....this is how those with make work jobs keep em. T

    Plant trees if you want to make a sustainable difference....

    This myth was busted days after the first Gore claim that earth would end by 2012 if we didn't send him out to save it...LOL...
  5. shantz
    Report Abuse
    shantz - March 07, 2013 1:56 pm
    I wondering community choice aggregation could play a role in this in terms of utilizing more renewable energy sources….
  6. shantz
    Report Abuse
    shantz - March 07, 2013 2:00 pm
    The vast majority of the science community believes global warming is happening because of human activities and that is poses a real threat to human existence.

    As entertaining as your pseudo-science is, it would be much more responsible to leave that to people who actually know what they are talking about.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick