Traffic

Who’s clogging Highway 29?

Improvement group seeks traffic answers
2012-12-20T20:10:00Z 2012-12-22T00:12:16Z Who’s clogging Highway 29?MICHAEL WATERSON Napa Valley Register
December 20, 2012 8:10 pm  • 

When the first citizens advisory committee of the Caltrans-funded Highway 29 improvement study met in Napa on Wednesday evening, the agenda quickly slowed to a crawl with bumper-to-bumper questions.

While discussions at two previous public workshops in American Canyon and Napa were mostly guided by blue-sky assumptions and wish lists, committee members wanted hard data — lots of it.

The need for specifics on traffic volume, the impact of the widening Highway 12 through Jameson Canyon and why someone representing the city of Vallejo and Solano County wasn’t at the table were just some of the concerns expressed.

“Who is in the car?” Chuck McMinn, executive director of Napa Valley Vine Trail, asked. “Numbers are meaningless unless you know that.”

Bill Stevenson of The Doctors Company wanted statistics such as where the most accidents on Highway 29 occurred and the timing of traffic signals.

“How much through traffic do we want to accommodate or do we want to divert?” Hans Korve, a resident of the county and a transportation planner, asked.

When answers weren’t immediately forthcoming, some members were frustrated.

“I feel like we’re going at this backwards,” said Deborah Dommen of Treasury Wine Estates. “I need more information to make up my mind.”

Some thought the committee’s role should be more than advisory. “I guess I came to this thing thinking we have a lot more power,” said McMinn.

Matt Taecker, of urban planning firm Dyett & Bhatia, said the final decision on a plan will be made by the study’s steering committee made up of the mayors of the affected cities, the Caltrans regional director and other transportation and government officials from Napa and Solano. The steering committee met in November and appointed the citizens committee members.

The $300,000 study deals with an eight-mile stretch of the highway from the south county line north to Trancas Street in Napa. Despite assurances that Solano County was creating a plan that would dovetail with Napa’s, some members were skeptical.

“We can’t do this unless Solano County is sitting here,” said Korve. The 20-member committee has a seat reserved for a Vallejo resident that has not been filled.

As at the Napa workshop, some committee members equated highway improvement with simply moving traffic. But David Oro and others from American Canyon said safety of school children and other pedestrians was at least as important.

“We live with that traffic,” Oro said, who wants residents to be able to cross the highway safely.

Nance Matson, chair of American Canyon Open Space Committee, said Highway 29 is the main thoroughfare of a “vibrant community” and should be an asset for residents and local businesses.

“We have a right to define our character as something other than a warehouse or a freeway,” said American Canyon resident Keith Pepper.

McMinn agreed citizens were right to expect more.

“It’s criminal there are no sidewalks along the highway, no biking or hiking facilities,” McMinn said.

As he stated at the fall workshops, urban planner Terence Bottomley said the study’s goal was to plan a “complete street,” with provisions for bicycles, pedestrians and public transportation.

Kate Miller, executive director of Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency (NCTPA), said the results of an ongoing study to identify the highway’s travelers would be made available as soon as possible. Project manager Rajeev Bhatia, and Eliot Hurwitz of NCTPA, promised to respond to emailed requests for statistical information.

Highway 29 corridor improvement, Miller said, was a long-term project that would have to be completed in segments, not all at once.

Differing viewpoints and priorities aside, one thing everyone seemed to agree on was presenting a unified voice to Caltrans, the road’s owner. Oro suggested that the timing of the study is good, that the state transportation department was ready to work with the county to solve the congestion and enhance the experience of Napa Valley visitors.

“A solution is a lot closer (than ever) on the political front,” Oro said.

At the conclusion of the two-hour meeting, Oro was made chair and Korve vice chair of the committee by consensus.

Despite the seeming diversions, Taecker said he was generally satisfied with how the meeting went.

“We got a really clear understanding where people stand,” he said. “It sharpened our focus what to do before we meet next.”

The date for the next committee has not been set, but was suggested for the end of January. The timeline of the study calls for a finished plan by May, 2013.

Copyright 2015 Napa Valley Register. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(9) Comments

  1. napanurse
    Report Abuse
    napanurse - December 20, 2012 10:53 pm
    Get us a high speed train that connects to the Vallejo ferry and BART. Problem solved.
  2. glenroy
    Report Abuse
    glenroy - December 21, 2012 9:34 am
    It’s certainly easy to get frustrated, no entity is better at that than Caltrans…but in the end what difference will it make?...particularly at his point?....
    The Wine Valley is a top 5 west coast destination, the more SF attracts the more NV attracts….and it’s a growing market, not the fad many thought when we were the Prune Capital of the World.
    I think rail service could help a little, ferry from Imola, more prop region air service…but in the end it’s maybe 5% of a growing problem....
  3. publiusa
    Report Abuse
    publiusa - December 21, 2012 9:45 am
    Every stop light, development and street improvement impeding traffic flow on HWY 29 in American Canyon was required by the city with the approval of CALTRANS. I wonder then which "criminals" Mr. McMinn is referring to? Or was this just a comment he made when he was feeling so powerless.
  4. journeyman
    Report Abuse
    journeyman - December 21, 2012 5:24 pm
    I recall that we could of had bart to napa but that napa didn't want it up here. But we have a train, and we have a river, so why not utilize both?? Yes people love to drive their cars but its time to get out of the car and start taking public transportation....just like they do in europe. We should be emulating the european model! Its time for change. Promote public transportation. Get out of the car.
  5. Red Dirt Town
    Report Abuse
    Red Dirt Town - December 23, 2012 5:37 pm
    Who is on the Citizens Committee? Same old suspects?
  6. Annoying_Gnat
    Report Abuse
    Annoying_Gnat - December 23, 2012 11:57 pm
    Who is clogging Napa Valley roads. Look to the stone bridge report. Next look at the lack of affordable housing growth up valley where most of the traffic goes to. Jobs are mostly there. Housing is in Lower valley. You wine people are choking your self with your dumb stance on housing in the up valley.Stop drinking the product and make a sober reassessment of the problem. The BOS and Napa Council are not helping the problem. They are signing off on everything that contributes to the problem. It takes guts to face up to the fact that your grand plan made a tremendous amount of money and is slowly choking you in the process. For your information you are choking the people who live here.
  7. Annoying_Gnat
    Report Abuse
    Annoying_Gnat - December 24, 2012 12:02 am
    What are you going to do at the Napa end? Where are these people supposed to go in the winter rains. Will you lead the way? I truly doubt that.
  8. Annoying_Gnat
    Report Abuse
    Annoying_Gnat - December 24, 2012 12:13 am
    When are you going to build a European transportation system here in California?
    Never! This is not Europe. Do you even know what gas costs in Europe? With gas costs so cheap here in comparisome no one will ride your non existent transportation system. I certainly won't. My car goes where I want to go. Your transportation system just doesn't hack it.
  9. H Bridges
    Report Abuse
    H Bridges - December 27, 2012 10:17 am
    “It’s criminal there are no sidewalks along the highway, no biking or hiking facilities,” McMinn said.

    It's this type of logic that gets us nowhere. Think about what she's asking for...sidewalks, biking/hiking lanes...what that is going to do is lower, the already congested highway, speed limit and create more traffic. Putting that whole shopping center in the smack middle of the connection from Napa to the real world created this traffic because traffic lights we're created every 1/4 mile.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick