Staff endorses roundabouts on California Boulevard

Hearing planned on reversing First and Second streets
2013-01-16T18:35:00Z 2013-01-29T22:02:13Z Staff endorses roundabouts on California BoulevardCHANTAL M. LOVELL Napa Valley Register
January 16, 2013 6:35 pm  • 

As the city prepares to open downtown streets to two-way traffic, it may pursue plans to construct two roundabouts and possibly reverse the directions of First and Second streets between Jefferson Street and California Boulevard.

Public Works Department staff said Tuesday it will ask the City Council this spring to add the roundabouts to the city’s Capital Improvement Project program, which covers pending projects over the next five years.

On Jan. 29, the city will hold a meeting at 6 p.m. in City Hall to get residents’ opinions on whether it should also pursue flipping the direction of First and Second between Jefferson and California as part of the roundabout project.

The roundabouts are the product of a $112,000 study the city commissioned in 2010 to look at traffic circulation west of downtown.

According to the study, conducted by Roseville-based Omni-Means LTD, emergency response times from the downtown fire station to Browns Valley Road and traffic flow could be improved with the installation of roundabouts and reversing street directions, making First eastbound and Second westbound between Jefferson and California.

The study looked at three scenarios: Making no changes, reversing the directions of the street couplet and opening First and Second two-way traffic, as is set to happen east of Jefferson in downtown.

Traffic counts, gathered from cell phones being driven through the survey area during morning and evening rush hour, showed that opening up each road to two-way traffic would worsen traffic flows, with First bearing the brunt of the traffic.

Reversing the direction of the streets would bring only minimal increases in vehicle trips to either street, and slightly reduce the number of cars on adjacent Third and Clay streets, according to Senior Civil Engineer Jason Holley.

With that information, Omni-Means explored how the addition of traffic circles would affect traffic.

Omni-Means said roundabouts on California Boulevard at First and Second streets would reduce the emergency response times to Browns Valley and improve the roads’ level of service.

These benefits would occur if the roads were left as they are now or if their directions were changed, according to a city staff report.

Thirty years down the road, roundabouts would provide even greater traffic relief, the city said.

“There is a need, as we look at future traffic projections for build-out, to do something at those intersections,” said Deputy Public Works Director Eric Whan.

With a traffic circle, motorists yield to those already in the circle and there is a continuous flow of traffic moving in and out, counter-clockwise, at a speed of \ 18 to 20 miles per hour.

Roundabouts typically don’t see the gridlock common at traditional intersections, city staff said. At a traditional four-way intersection, “only one leg of the intersection can go at a time,” Holly said. “When one guy is going, three are waiting, roughly. Everybody has to wait their turn and over time, you have a build-up of cars.”

Omni-Means President Ross Ainsworth cited studies to the council that show the safety of roundabouts, where fatalities are nearly nonexistent and collisions tend to be of the slow-speed, rear-end and side-swipe type.

Ainsworth went on to say that studies show most people have a negative view of roundabouts before they are installed, but hold a positive opinion once they have tried them.

Mayor Jill Techel joked about the notion that roundabouts would confuse visitors bound for downtown. “If we do roundabouts, it’s not like we haven’t confused them before,” she said, alluding to the current pattern of one-way streets.

Staff said the roundabouts would have sufficient signage and landscaping to prevent confusion. If someone happens to miss their exit, they may go around the circle an extra time and exit at the proper location.

Two downtown developers spoke in favor of making changes to the area. Peter Bartlett of Zapolski Real Estate, which bought the Shops at Napa Center last May after the city approved the Downtown Specific Plan, said the city needs to make it easier to access downtown from Highway 29.

“One of the crucial pieces of the Downtown Specific Plan and to us was the change in the circulation pattern downtown,” Bartlett said. “The piece west of downtown is also very important to all businesses downtown. ... Making it easy for inbound travelers to get to the downtown core commercial area of Napa is going to be critical to support the ongoing development that we’re experiencing in Napa right now.”

In the long term, the city could look at installing roundabouts farther west on First Street, at the northbound and southbound Highway 29 on/offramps and at the intersection with Freeway Drive. The hope is that such changes would eliminate the need to widen the First Street overpass, which is likely financially unfeasible, according to the city.

The cost of constructing the roundabouts at California Boulevard is $4.5 million, Holley said. Switching the direction of the couplet would cost an additional $1.5 million.

The city had previously estimated that replacing the First Street overpass would cost $60 million to $80 million.

Funding could come from federal, state and local sources and the city has already applied to the Napa County Transportation & Planning Agency for approximately $1 million in federal grants.

The project is one of many that department staff are drafting and will propose to the council as it develops its budget, likely in May, for the 2013-14 and 2014-15 fiscal years.

Copyright 2015 Napa Valley Register. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(12) Comments

  1. jackofalltrades
    Report Abuse
    jackofalltrades - January 17, 2013 8:06 am
    Finally!! It makes so much sense to make First Street the main entrance to downtown from the freeway...that off ramp had never made sense.
  2. rocketman
    Report Abuse
    rocketman - January 17, 2013 10:08 am
    ....agree......20 years of studies and well over a million dollars in studies costs and we "may" have a decision..........
  3. H1S
    Report Abuse
    H1S - January 17, 2013 11:30 am
    A roundabout on California and 1st - genius! Good thing it's close to the Queen and a auto repair.
  4. napa1957
    Report Abuse
    napa1957 - January 17, 2013 12:56 pm
    I will drive 3 miles out of my way to avoid this intersection altogether! I can't imagine how someone feels who is not familiar with our town! I've visited several places where roundabouts are common and they really do make sense!
  5. ScottRAB
    Report Abuse
    ScottRAB - January 17, 2013 4:39 pm
    The FHWA has a video about modern roundabouts that is mostly accurate (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhHzly_6lWM ).
    Modern roundabouts are the safest form of intersection in the world. Search www.iihs.org for FAQs and safety facts. The safety comes from the ‘slow and go’ operation instead of the ‘stop or go fast’ way a stop light works. The smaller size of the modern roundabout is what makes them safer and keeps speeds in the 20 mph range. This makes it much easier to avoid a crash or stop for pedestrians. It also means that if a crash happens the likelihood of injury is very low. Safety is the #1 reason there are over 2,400 modern roundabouts in the US today and many more on the way.
    Slow and go also means less delay than a stop light or stop sign, especially the other 20 hours a day people aren’t driving to or from work. Average daily delay at a signal is around 12 seconds per car. At a modern roundabout average delay is less than five seconds. Signals take an hour of demand and restrict it to a half hour, at best only half the traffic gets to go at any one time. At a modern roundabout four drivers entering from four directions can all enter at the same time. Don’t try that with a signalized intersection.
  6. glenroy
    Report Abuse
    glenroy - January 17, 2013 4:53 pm
    There will be more accidents...way too many cars for a roundabout they'll be backed up from Jefferson to back to the roundabout.

    I do not know a single current downtown shopper who thinks two way traffic is going to help downtown, at least with locals.
  7. elmer
    Report Abuse
    elmer - January 17, 2013 8:25 pm
    Add an on/off ramp on Old Sonoma Rd to 29. This would peel off a great deal of traffic along California Blvd between 3rd and 1rst.
  8. glenroy
    Report Abuse
    glenroy - January 18, 2013 9:28 am
    Excellent idea...but they would have to remove one of the largest low income projects in the town...I think.
  9. gettingreal
    Report Abuse
    gettingreal - January 18, 2013 10:56 am
    I like how they dismissed the roundabout failure on East Ave. by saying that it wasn't a roundabout.
  10. ScottRAB
    Report Abuse
    ScottRAB - January 18, 2013 3:06 pm
    Real,
    What failure of what modern roundabout. Do you know the distiguishing features of a modern roundabout? there are three.
  11. gettingreal
    Report Abuse
    gettingreal - January 19, 2013 2:52 pm
    Scott,
    They had no trouble calling it a roundabout when it was in the planning phase, so suddenly now that it's a complete failure no one wants to call it a roundabout? I'm not buying it. Your plan is an unnecessary waste of money which will only make traffic worse.
  12. gettingreal
    Report Abuse
    gettingreal - January 19, 2013 2:57 pm
    In case you haven't noticed, we still have potholes to fill
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick