County goals

Wagenknecht proposes gun exchange, revamp of county elections office

Delays in ballot counts irk supervisor
2013-01-04T20:00:00Z 2013-01-09T19:33:32Z Wagenknecht proposes gun exchange, revamp of county elections officePETER JENSEN Napa Valley Register
January 04, 2013 8:00 pm  • 

In his third go-around as chairman of the Napa County Board of Supervisors, Supervisor Brad Wagenknecht is charting an agenda that figures to have impacts rippling far beyond his First District, which is rooted in the southwest corner of the county.

The agenda includes familiar local political and government fare such as the Napa Pipe project, land-use in Angwin, the redevelopment of the Health and Human Services Agency’s campus and working to attain federal funding for the Oxbow bypass project.

But Wagenknecht also proposed severing elections from the duties of the county assessor-recorder-clerk’s office, expanding a potential recycled water pipeline to supply the Carneros area, setting up a local gun exchange program and convening meetings of local elected officials, and those from Marin, Sonoma and Solano counties.

Wagenknecht, who served as board chairman in 2003 and 2008, takes the helm of the Board of Supervisors during its first meeting of 2013 next Tuesday. He sat down with the Napa Valley Register last week to discuss the year ahead.

Following the weeks-long delay in knowing the results of Napa County’s election last November, Wagenknecht said he’ll be proposing a reorganization to make elections management a separate duty from the county’s assessor-recorder-clerk, which is an office held by John Tuteur. Tuteur is also the registrar of voters.

Wagenknecht said those delays have occurred in several of the last election cycles.

“There’s been a great deal of dissatisfaction with some of the having to wait three weeks to hear,” Wagenknecht said. “I thought it would be one election, but it turns out this is the game plan.”

He said he’s also displeased with the sweeping conversion to vote-by-mail in Napa County — more than 80 percent are now vote-by-mail — and he believes that’s a contributing factor to the delays.

“I’m going to propose that we look at different configurations for that little function,” Wagenknecht said. “No other county has the issues that I can see. There might be other answers.”

Contacted on Friday, Tuteur said the idea to split up his duties had been proposed several times in recent years, but had not been implemented.

The post-election delays in coming up with a final vote count are a product of diligence in counting ballots, Tuteur said.

“If you are going to have a good registrar it’s going to take that long, no matter who the registrar is,” Tuteur said.

Wagenknecht said he’d also like to start a conversation about setting up an gun exchange locally that could give people gift cards or other incentives for turning in firearms. It would be modeled after other programs that have gained attention nationally after the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., last month.

“I want to start with that conversation,” Wagenknecht said. “I want to meet with our community and see what we can do to move Napa in that direction.”

One of the biggest issues the board will tackle this year will also be one of its first — the Napa Pipe project, which has a hearing before the board set for Jan. 14. The supervisors are slated to hear — and potentially vote on — the project’s proposed General Plan and zoning amendments, which, if approved, would be another step toward the project breaking ground.

Wagenknecht said that even with the upcoming hearing, his long-term vision for the project, if it’s going to be residential, is to pursue annexing it within the city of Napa. He said earlier last week that the county must wrap up satisfying its current housing plan, which includes a 20-acre residential development at the site, and that necessitates the hearing.

“I think the eventual answer of that is going to be annexation,” Wagenknecht said. “We’re going to get our fingers dirty with that in a few weeks.”

Also next Tuesday, the board has been asked to weigh in on the potential purchase of the Dey Labs site, which is next to the Napa Pipe site, as a future home for the county Health and Human Services Agency.

Wagenknecht said he’s heard neighborhood concerns about a proposal to redevelop the agency’s Old Sonoma Road campus. The plans call for consolidating the agency to one location, which would require a multistory building and a lengthy construction project.

Neighbors worry about sightline and the impacts of construction, said Wagenknecht, who intends to bring those to his fellow supervisors when it’s time to make a decision.

“I want to take very seriously the issues that the neighbors have expressed to me,” Wagenknecht said.

Beyond that, he said he’s looking to Supervisors Diane Dillon and Bill Dodd this year to work with Pacific Union College and Save Rural Angwin to find a compromise on land-use issues in Angwin, following the defeat of Measure U at the November election.

The board in 2009 partially tackled the issue when the “eco-village” development proposal was still alive. The supervisors placed restrictions on the potential for residential development within Angwin’s so-called urban bubble, but put aside until June 2010 a decision on the 63 acres where the ecovillage was proposed. The ecovillage was dropped, and the board never took action on that decision.

That inaction was one of the motivations that led Save Rural Angwin to pursue a ballot initiative to bar future housing developments from those parcels, but Measure U was defeated.

Looking back, Wagenknecht said the board could have done more, but doubted any action would have been considered a complete solution at that point.

“Could we have been better?” Wagenknecht asked. “Probably. I don’t know if it would have done us any good. I don’t know if there was an answer from the board at that point.”

Following Measure U, he said he looks for a dialogue between the county, the college and Save Rural Angwin as the solution.

“I think Measure U showed both sides there’s strong feelings,” Wagenknecht said. “I think both sides still think it’s very much alive politically. A better answer would be a negotiated settlement.”

Wagenknecht said the Los Carneros Water District may have an opportunity this year to get access to recycled water from the Napa Sanitation District because the approved St. Regis resort, at Stanly Ranch, has plans for an 8-inch pipeline to extend under the Napa River to the development site.

The 8-inch pipe would be large enough only to cover the resort’s needs, but Wagenknecht said he will advocate the pipeline be expanded to 20- or 24-inches. That would be enough to supply up to 1,000 acre-feet of recycled water to agricultural production in Carneros in the winter, and 150 acre-feet in the summer.

Aware that this proposal could draw criticism that it would promote growth and development, Wagenknecht said he’s not advocating the sewer line to the resort project be expanded if and when the resort project obtains construction financing.

“We’d be foolish to not get at least a 20-inch line; 24-inch would be better,” Wagenknecht said. “We’re not trying to be a big growth motivator. This is for ag purposes. It’s basically a one-way pipe.”

On the Oxbow bypass project, Wagenknecht said two recent rain storms have proven the effectiveness of the flood control projects on Napa Creek and the Napa River — and the need to get the $23 million in federal funding to finish the downtown bypass.

Without the project, he said the creek and the river undoubtedly would have flooded in downtown, wracking up more than $1 million in damages and government costs.

“That’s the last big piece,” Wagenknecht said. “We saw how those bypasses worked in the Napa Creek. It’s so nice to go down to Uva and not have to step over sand bags.”

Shaking loose money from the federal government may prove tricky this year given Congress’ focus on cutting spending, but Wagenknecht said it’s imperative local officials continue to try.

“We’ve done our share” Wagenknecht said of the local funding share of the flood project. “This is in their court to do. It should have been almost automatic but it’s not and we have to fight for it.”

Copyright 2015 Napa Valley Register. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(17) Comments

  1. 356met25
    Report Abuse
    356met25 - January 04, 2013 8:34 pm
    First they taketh our guns then they taketh our rights...or what rights we have remaining. The persons who giveth away the guns are not the ones who would use them to hurt people. Most likely they would be law abiding, sane people who think they are helping society by getting rid of their arms, and by that...making them feel empowered, as if they are making a difference by doing so.
  2. kevin
    Report Abuse
    kevin - January 04, 2013 10:22 pm
    I like the idea of a gun exchange. My 9 mm is a little small, and exchanging it for a 45 would be great!
  3. 04myz06
    Report Abuse
    04myz06 - January 04, 2013 10:43 pm
    I have met Mr. Wagenknecht through a mutual friend and have followed his political career and actions and I must say that I am disappointed in Mr. Wagenknecht's desire to "start a conversation about setting up an gun exchange locally that could give people gift cards or other incentives for turning in firearms." I can't help but believe that Mr.Wagenknecht's desire is an emotional response to a tragic incident caused by a disturbed boy who took out his problems on his mother and the children and staff at Sandy Brook Elementary School. I am truly disappointed.
  4. 04myz06
    Report Abuse
    04myz06 - January 04, 2013 11:19 pm
    My computer typed Sandy Brook when I was trying to type Sandy Hook. Setting the record straight since there seems to be no way to edit our posts after submission.
  5. napa1957
    Report Abuse
    napa1957 - January 04, 2013 11:30 pm
    I haven't always been a Brad fan politically, but do respect him personally. No one mentions any of the issues except gun exchange, which is really only part of what this is about. I am overall impressed with Mr. Wagenknecht's thoughts in this interview. Please DO separate Mr. Tuteur's duties and give folks the opportunity to vote in person! Napa Pipe, if it becomes a residential area, should be part of the City. I agree with the need for the recycled water to Carneros. I believe that the Voters have spoke about the ability of PUC to control their own property in Angwin, so time to butt out on that one! As far as the gun exchange goes, all I see here is an opportunity for those who WANT to (no one is saying anyone HAS to) turn in a gun, there will be an organized venue to access, with an reward for having taken the time and effort. I wonder if my two non-working firearms that belonged to my father might get me a gift card?
  6. foss valley
    Report Abuse
    foss valley - January 04, 2013 11:45 pm
    "From my cold dead fingers"
  7. Wineandfood
    Report Abuse
    Wineandfood - January 05, 2013 7:21 am
    Except for the gun exchange not one thing he mentioned was new or his idea. He is not a visionary and not a leader.
  8. rocketman
    Report Abuse
    rocketman - January 05, 2013 7:58 am
    ........that is the fallacy of most of the gun exchanges......people can turn in junk and even stolen weapons with no questions asked. The gun exchange does nothing to remove firearms from criminals. Yes your non-working firearms would qualify. As Kevin has stated, you can use your gift card that you were going to use cask for a particular purchase and then use the money saved to buy a more functional gun. But if we are going to have this as a feel good program, I'm all for it. It doesn't do anything for crime but if politicians think it helps, let them believe so....
  9. rocketman
    Report Abuse
    rocketman - January 05, 2013 8:05 am
    One of the other fallacies of the gun buy back programs is that you can actually turn in a gun that was used in a homicide, (a important piece of evidence) and the gun can never be used as evidence in a trial because the gun will be destroyed by the policy of the buy back program.
  10. publiusa
    Report Abuse
    publiusa - January 05, 2013 8:59 am
    Yea Brad. Finally the elections department will free of the old man from the typewriter and abacus age.
  11. hermajesty
    Report Abuse
    hermajesty - January 05, 2013 9:52 am
    "That little function." WOW, Mr. Wagenknecht!!! Have you seen what goes into an election? So you are throwing a little temper tantrum because you had to wait 3 weeks for results? Accurate, results!!!!. Is faster always better??? I believe the Secretary of State comented in a letter to the editor on here that a while back that by state law, Napa County really have longer than that to produce results, so you are really going to out Mr. Tuteur, the man who rolled out a fairly successful election because you had to wait 3 weeks? shame on you. Mr. Tuteur is a resouse Napa County should appreciate, not kick out.
  12. publiusa
    Report Abuse
    publiusa - January 05, 2013 1:06 pm
    The secretary of state's letter was nothing more than a protection letter between "good old boys(girls)", most likely at the request of Tuteur. She had no clue that Tuteur has mandated the closure of polling places against the will of the people. The real reason for the outrageously long time for election results, in my opinion, is the total chaos in the elections office.
  13. napanight
    Report Abuse
    napanight - January 05, 2013 1:16 pm
    Yeah, remove elections from the assessor-recorder-county clerk duties! Although this was looked into several years ago, Tuteur probably promised the Board things would change if he could continue his vision. Tuteur can say whatever he wants, but his predecessor Mrs. Bonds never had these type problems with elections. Tuteur created his own problem of delayed results by establishing so many mail ballot precincts over going to the precinct.
  14. fmmt47
    Report Abuse
    fmmt47 - January 05, 2013 7:22 pm
    Good idea Brad, I need to upgrade my weapon too!
  15. NAPAsince1976
    Report Abuse
    NAPAsince1976 - January 05, 2013 7:57 pm
    Regarding elections department proposals by Supervisor Wagenknecht and Mr. Tuteur's response: Brad, the separation of duties is long over due. Mr. Tuteur created the problem by closing polling places and forcing voters to mail in ballots without adequately providing for increased staffing to timely verify and count the ballots. Because of the delay my vote means nothing to me as most candidates and most measures have already been passed or defeated by the time my ballot is counted. The simple solution is to open up more polling stations, the electronic ballots cast are available election night....
    Brad, I will communicate with you personally and detail how this can be a cost neutral separation. I will also be willing to serve without salary as administrative head of the new department to effect a smooth transition.
  16. splittingheadache
    Report Abuse
    splittingheadache - January 06, 2013 11:28 am
    Gun by back or exchange programs do nothing to take firearms out of the hands of criminals. The guns are turned in by law abiding citizens who now leave themselves vulnerable.
    See the story below. I bet she is glad she had a firearm. Guns do save lives. This occurred on January 6, 2013. The story was taken from
    A woman in Loganville, GA saw someone trying to break into her home during the day on Friday. The woman grabbed her two kids and her .38 revolver and hid in a crawl space. Despite hiding, the would be intruder found the family and the woman was forced to open fire on the suspect. She fired all six shots from her gun and hit the suspect 5 times. The woman tried to hold the intruder at gunpoint, but he fled the scene in his car. However, the intruder was badly injured and crashed his car nearby where he was apprehended by police. The suspect has a criminal record and was most recently released from jail in August.
  17. Cathy Odom
    Report Abuse
    Cathy Odom - January 06, 2013 4:49 pm
    Maybe keep the guns in storage at a secure location for about a year or two, and follow up with crimes before and after? Or keep the guns forever?
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick