Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Ms. Dervin responds to former mayor's critique

Ms. Dervin responds to former mayor's critique

  • Updated

Mr. Galbraith's response to my Jan. 21 letter to the editor (“Wrong on Adams Street property,” Jan. 28) is riddled with untruths and/or his opinion disguised as knowledge from one who “understands.”

The following is copied verbatim from the city of St. Helena Report of the Financing Civic Infrastructure Task Force, May 6, 2020, page 4:

We recommend that the City pay for Option 1 or some variant by:

• Selling the existing City Hall site to a hotel developer for approximately $4 million,

• Issuing roughly $20 million in 30-year bonds to cover the remainder of the cost. The annual payments on those bonds at 5% interest would be roughly $1.3 million and would be funded by the taxes from the new hotel built on the City Hall site.

• Renting or leasing space for the next few years for City Hall and the Police Station, or house them in existing City buildings.

• Reducing the $20 million figure above by selling one or more other small City-owned properties to further cover costs.

• Ideally the City could form some kind of Private-Public-Partnership either with one or more hotel developers who would fund or partially fund the City Hall and Police Station design and construction as part of their purchase of the current City Hall property.

On page 6 the same report states:

Finally, we make the following supplementary recommendations: 1. The City should QUICKLY approve at least one additional hotel project inside City Limits, beyond the one recommended for the existing City Hall site in Option 1. A second new hotel is almost a necessity to have the City well-financed in the future. We express no location preference, and we don’t see a current necessity for more than two hotels, but we do see two hotels as the best way to fund the infrastructure improvements under consideration.

I’m pretty sure Mr. Galbraith knows that Mr. Ted Hall’s hotel project has been approved. And, by the way, it is going to be spectacular. Well placed within city limits, and undoubtedly a big hit with our tourists.

Another source of valuable and factual information is the Feasibility Analysis and Comparison of Sites for New Affordable Housing Development Final Report completed by Vernazza Wolfe Associates and submitted to the city of St. Helena in September of 2015. In the Introduction on page iii, we read:

Site Ranking Based on considerations of site availability and size, the Adams Street site stands out as the best possible site for rental housing among the six assessed in this study. However, the City has gone through two processes in the past to consider uses for this site, including obtaining proposals for affordable housing and then later conducting a visioning process for the site for potential mixed-use development. This site is still highly recommended, and perhaps it would be possible to design a project that could meet with public approval. Only a portion of the site (1.3 acres) is being recommended at this time, which may help it to gain public support.

Mr. Galbraith represents people who, in my personal opinion, are sociologically tone deaf and don’t have the ability to think outside the box of hotel development, thus limiting them to seeing Adams Street only as a potential cash cow. St. Helena can do much better than that.

Nancy Dervin

St. Helena


Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News