Skip to main contentSkip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
alert top story

Napa Police seek tips on discovery of ghost guns; two teenagers detained

  • Updated

Napa Police is seeking information connected to the discovery of unlicensed “ghost guns” this week that led to the detention of two teenage boys.

In the first incident Monday, officers were notified about illegal firearms at a home in the 2000 block of Eva Street, where a search turned up an unregistered 9mm handgun, a high-capacity magazine, and ammunition, the department said in a news release. A 16-year-old boy was later found on a school campus and arrested, and a search of the teen revealed more ammunition in his backpack, according to police.

On Tuesday, police were called to another home in the 100 block of Belvedere Court, where they again found a 9mm ghost gun, a high-capacity magazine, and ammunition, police reported. A 17-year-old boy was later located and arrested at Napa Police headquarters.

Both teens were booked into the Napa County juvenile detention center. Police were unable to interview either boy because of their ages, according to the department.

Napa Police said it continued to investigate the weapon incidents and added that there is no current threat to the public.

Anyone with information about either case is asked to contact police School Resource Officer Eric Koford at ekoford@cityofnapa.org or send an anonymous tip to Napa Police by texting the word 707NPD and tip information to 847411 (tip411).

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in a gun rights case that could lead to more guns on the streets of New York and Los Angeles and threaten restrictions on guns in subways, airports, bars, churches, schools and other places where people gather.The case before the court Wednesday centers on New York's restrictive gun permit law and whether limits the state has placed on carrying a gun in public violate the Second Amendment.Gun rights advocates including the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association and two private citizens challenging the law hope that the court with a 6-3 conservative majority is poised to side with them. They want the court to say the New York law is too restrictive, which could call into question similar laws in other states. Such a ruling could dramatically increase the number of people eligible to carry firearms as they go about their daily lives.The court last issued major gun rights decisions in 2008 and 2010. Those decisions established a nationwide right to keep a gun at home for self-defense. The question for the court now has to do with carrying a gun in public for self-defense.In most of the country gun owners have little difficulty legally carrying their weapons when they go out. But about half a dozen states, including populous California and several Eastern states, restrict the carrying of guns to those who can demonstrate a particular need for doing so. The justices could decide whether those laws, known as "may issue" laws, can stand.The arguments come as gun violence has surged. Gun control groups say if a high court ruling requires states to drop restrictions, the result will be more violence. Gun rights groups, meanwhile, say the risk of a confrontation is precisely why they have a right to be armed for self-defense.The New York law the court is reviewing has been in place since 1913 and says that to carry a concealed handgun in public for self-defense, a person applying for a license has to demonstrate "proper cause," an actual need to carry the weapon. Applicants who get a license are either issued an unrestricted license, which gives them broad ability to carry a weapon in public, or a restricted license allowing them to carry a gun in certain circumstances. Those circumstances include for hunting or target shooting, when traveling for work or when in backcountry areas.New York says if the Supreme Court sides with the challengers to the law it would have "devastating consequences for public safety," invalidate longstanding laws like New York's and jeopardize firearm restrictions that states and the federal government have in place where people gather, from airports to schools.The Biden administration, which is urging the justices to uphold New York's law, says California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island all have similar laws that could be affected by a ruling from the court. Connecticut and Delaware also have "may issue" laws, though they are somewhat different.Additional reporting by The Associated Press.

Most-read police briefs on NapaValleyRegister.com

Here is a roundup of police and fire reports in Napa County.

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News