Commentary: DNA testing isn't enough. We need the right to fingerprint matching
AP

Commentary: DNA testing isn't enough. We need the right to fingerprint matching

  • 0
{{featured_button_text}}
The Ninth Judicial Circuit was picked to be among a handful of courts across Florida to test remote jury trials, to be conducted by online video conferencing, after criminal and civil trials were suspended in Florida in early March because of the coronavirus pandemic.

The Ninth Judicial Circuit was picked to be among a handful of courts across Florida to test remote jury trials, to be conducted by online video conferencing, after criminal and civil trials were suspended in Florida in early March because of the coronavirus pandemic. (Spyros Arsenis/Dreamstime/TNS)

The effectiveness of DNA testing and searches of the national DNA database is well-known. Over the last three decades, 137 wrongly convicted people were exonerated through DNA database "hits," which identified the person who had actually committed the crime. Currently, all 50 states, as well as the federal government provide some kind of right to post-conviction DNA testing.

But there is no such right to fingerprint matching in most states. Only Arkansas, Idaho, Illinois and Minnesota give defendants the right to have crime scene prints compared with prints in law enforcement fingerprint databases. If every state established this right, other innocent people who have been wrongly convicted could be exonerated.

Archie Williams, who was recently seen by millions in his performance on "America's Got Talent," was exonerated last year based on a fingerprint search. He was convicted in 1983 for a rape that he did not commit and served 36 years of a life sentence in Angola prison in Louisiana.

The source of the crime scene prints in Williams' case, some in blood, was not identified. The Innocence Project tried unsuccessfully for 20 years in federal and state courts to have those prints submitted to the national fingerprint database for comparison. On March 14, 2019, a new judge on the case, Kinasiyumki Kimble, simply ordered the database search even though Louisiana did not have a statute that specifically required that procedure.

There was a database hit: a deceased serial offender who had pleaded guilty to a similar crime and admitted to committing other sexual assaults in Baton Rouge, which occurred while Williams was in prison. Williams was freed a week later.

Because the right to fingerprint database searching is so limited, we've found only nine individuals (four of whom were co-defendants), who have been exonerated because fingerprint database hits pointed to an alternate suspect. All nine exonerees were African American. These alternate suspects were responsible for at least 40 other crimes, including assaults and rapes, committed after the nine exonerees were convicted.

And in April, the Maryland Court of Appeals reversed the murder convictions of Jonathan Smith and David Faulkner based in large part on a "palm print" database hit that came from the exterior of a propped-up window. The palm print belonged to an early suspect who had a record for similar burglaries in the area.

Improved fingerprint technology and the FBI's Next Generation Identification system (the latest version of the repository of fingerprints submitted by federal, state and local law enforcement agencies) allow for better post-conviction database searching than earlier systems.

The failure of states to provide post-conviction access to fingerprint databases is inexcusable. Besides robbing innocent people of their freedom, refusal to do fingerprint searches means the guilty remain free.

Of course, neither fingerprint nor DNA analysis is infallible. And even a database match to someone other than the defendant is only evidence, not proof, of that person's guilt. Moreover, the growth of law enforcement biometric databases can create ethical, legal and social hazards. But if these databases, built with taxpayer dollars, exist, then they should be made available to people who may have been wronged by the criminal justice system.

___

ABOUT THE WRITERS

Simon A. Cole is director of the National Registry of Exonerations, a project of the University of California Irvine Newkirk Center for Science & Society, University of Michigan Law School & Michigan State University College of Law. Barry Scheck is co-founder of The Innocence Project and a professor at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University.

Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

  • Updated
  • 2 min to read

Five California counties, including Napa, got a huge windfall from miscalculating how local property taxes are divvied up with schools. Under a legislative deal, they will keep most of the extra money, columnist Dan Walters says.

The dual opinions that the Supreme Court issued Thursday concerning the release of President Donald Trump's financial records amount to a sound defeat for the White House's claims for aggrandized executive power. The court refused to break new ground to alter the constitutional power of the executive branch or the balance between it and Congress. Along the way, Chief Justice John G. Roberts ...

We are four months away from what is shaping up to be a very strange presidential election - the strangest in many of our lifetimes. Americans will vote in an atmosphere of deep and bitter division. We are at each other's throats in a way we have not been since the 1960s. In some ways it may be worse than the 1960s. We will also hold this election in the context of a pandemic and parallel to a ...

Why aren't critics of pandemic reopenings talking about California in the same breath as some other states? And what does that say about combating Covid-19? The pundits always single out Florida. Or Texas. Or Arizona. Or all three. Consider Paul Krugman's column on Monday. Krugman, one of the liberal stalwarts on the New York Times's op-ed page, believes that the reason the U.S. is "losing its ...

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, who had the case of former national security adviser Michael Flynn yanked out of his hands by a federal appeals court panel, is not through fighting. On Thursday, Sullivan's lawyers asked the full U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to rehear the case and reconsider the ruling of the three-judge panel. (On Friday the court ...

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News