Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Public utilities commission is working against California’s climate goals
Commentary

Public utilities commission is working against California’s climate goals

  • Updated
{{featured_button_text}}
Rooftop solar

Rooftop and other small solar projects are an important part of the state’s future energy grid, not just benefiting their owners, but providing stability, resilience, and key services to everyone. Given rooftop solar’s importance to us all, it is extremely disappointing that the California Public Utilities Commission unanimously voted last month to significantly reduce the value small-solar owners are credited for their energy contributions to the grid. 

The decision will discourage — or even destroy the market for — rooftop solar on existing roofs. It also raises the question of whether it will keep the state’s electric grid from reaching its goal of distributing 100% clean (nonfossil fuel) energy by 2045, as required by law. 

The commission maintains an incentive structure that pays Pacific Gas and Electric, Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas & Electric to do the wrong thing. The commission needs to rethink what is best for California and encourage more rooftop installations, which provide essential benefits, such as keeping the energy flowing locally during outages. They are the fastest route to 100% clean energy in the state. 

These millions of rooftop systems can act in concert to supply energy during peak demand, eliminating the need to power up or build new, inefficient, “peaker” electric generation plants. Less dramatically, rooftop systems allow solar owners to reduce their own grid use during high electric demand. 

Apartment complexes count on their systems to keep costs low for tenants; nonprofits rely on reduced energy costs to help fund their missions, and new homeowners rely on reduced costs from their mandated systems to offset the increased cost of their homes. Schools and local governments likewise depend on small solar systems to reduce energy costs and keep essential services running during power outages.

Big utilities’ main compensation comes from generous guaranteed returns on investment in large transmission and distribution projects. Utilities claim that rooftop solar owners aren’t paying their share of running the electric grid and are costing them money. This is inaccurate when grid services aren’t adequately valued. These utilities have every reason to fight rooftop and other small solar projects. And fight they do.

Commissioners are appointed by the governor, and the public has very little leverage on their decision-making. The commission does take public comments during its proceedings; in last month’s meeting, commenters were given one minute to speak, and the majority of the 40 people who spoke were against the change to the calculator. But these unelected commissioners apparently aren’t swayed by public input. The interests of the investor-owned utilities are well represented, while the public has less access. Additionally, they are shielded politically by being appointees. 

California ratepayers and residents deserve better representation, particularly now, when the state is at the crossroads between a reliable, safe, resilient, and affordable grid and a more-of-the-same approach that has led to expensive power, firestorms, and exponentially increasing climate disasters such as drought, high winds, and excessive heat.

Get involved with securing a clean, resilient and affordable energy future. Follow this link to add to the many voices calling for the grid of the future.

It's a summer tradition: Napa youth learn to swim at city-sponsored swimming lessons. Here's a look at how it's going.

Laura Neish is the executive director of 350 Bay Area. She wrote this for CalMatters, a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s Capitol works and why it matters.

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

  • Updated

New developments that help prepare students for tomorrow’s careers require a fresh approach, as well as more teachers who can transmit the knowledge, two education advocates say.

  • Updated

Black people are the most frequent targets of laws that prioritize streets for cars rather than pedestrians, says Anne Stuhldreher, head of The Financial Justice Project in the treasurer’s office of the city and county of San Francisco.

  • Updated

California has a history of treating public water as a commodity and entrusting it to corporate interests that fail to manage it responsibly, says Alexandra Nagy, the California director for Food & Water Watch

  • Updated

The bill allows city councils and boards of supervisors to override voter-adopted initiative measures in exchange for higher-density housing, setting a troubling standard that could eventually render the initiative power meaningless, says Antonio Diaz, organizational director at People Organizing to Demand Environmental & Economic Rights.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News